The 100 most cited papers on amblyopia: a bibliographic perspective.
Amblyopia
Bibliography
Citations
Development of vision
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
27
09
2021
accepted:
20
08
2022
medline:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
4
9
2022
entrez:
3
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To analyze the top 100 most cited papers related to amblyopia. A bibliographic search in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge across 55 years was performed. Eighty-nine of the 100 papers were published in first-quartile journals. Half (50) of the senior authors were from the USA. Most papers dealt with clinical science (72) and included original research (84). Forty-two of the articles related to all three types of amblyopia (refractive, strabismic and deprivation). Thirty-four related to both strabismic and refractive amblyopia. Around two-thirds of the papers dealt with treatment (34) and pathophysiology (30). Almost a quarter (23%) of the papers were multicenter studies. Nearly half (48) of the papers were published between 2000 and 2010. The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) published the highest number of studies (11), which dealt more with treatment (p = 0.01) and had higher average number of citations per years (p = 0.05). A larger number of articles on the treatment of amblyopia are newer (p = 0.01). There was no correlation between the time of their publication and the number of citations (p = 0.68, r = 0.042). Half of the papers were published between 2000 and 2010 and were spearheaded by PEDIG. Most papers dealt with treatment and pathophysiology. This study provides an important historical perspective, emphasizing the need for additional research to better understand this preventable and curable childhood vision impairment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36057007
doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02487-z
pii: 10.1007/s10792-022-02487-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1075-1089Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Hashemi H et al (2021) Prevalence of amblyopia and its determinants in a rural population: a population-based cross-sectional study. Strabismus 29(1):10–18
doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1871375
pubmed: 33455499
Muma S, Obonyo S (2020) The prevalence and causes of visual impairment among children in Kenya—the Kenya eye study. BMC Ophthalmol 20(1):399
doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01665-w
pubmed: 33028254
pmcid: 7542701
Loudon SE, Simonsz HJ (2005) The history of the treatment of amblyopia. Strabismus 13(2):93–106
doi: 10.1080/09273970590949818
pubmed: 16020365
Papageorgiou E, Asproudis I, Maconachie G, Tsironi EE, Gottlob I (2019) The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257(6):1061–1078
doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04254-w
pubmed: 30706134
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN, Yeagle EM, Lafer-Sousa R, Conway BR (2015) Binocular stereoscopy in visual areas V-2, V-3, and V-3A of the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex 25(4):959–971
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht288
pubmed: 24122139
Hubel D, Wiesel T (2012) David hubel and torsten wiesel. Neuron 75(2):182–184
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.002
pubmed: 22841302
Wiesel TN, Hubel DH (1963) Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J Neurophysiol 26:1003–1017
doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.1003
pubmed: 14084161
Holmes JM, Clarke MP (2006) Amblyopia. Lancet 367(9519):1343–1351
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4
pubmed: 16631913
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator G (2002) A randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 120(3):268–278
doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.268
Repka MX et al (2005) Two-year follow-up of a 6-month randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 123(2):149–157
doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.2.149
pubmed: 15710809
Garfield E (1987) 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 257(1):52–59
doi: 10.1001/jama.1987.03390010056028
pubmed: 3537352
Koh B, Banu R, Nusinovici S, Sabanayagam C (2020) 100 most-cited articles on diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 105:1329–1336
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316609
pubmed: 32855165
Link AM (1998) US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA 280(3):246–247
doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.246
pubmed: 9676670
Mimouni M et al (2018) Publication outcome of abstracts submitted to the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting. J Med Libr Assoc 106(1):57–64
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.314
pubmed: 29339934
pmcid: 5764594
Ohba N, Nakao K (2010) The 101 most frequently cited articles in ophthalmology journals from 1850 to 1949. Arch Ophthalmol 128(12):1610–1617
doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.308
pubmed: 21149789
Ohba N, Nakao K, Isashiki Y, Ohba A (2007) The 100 most frequently cited articles in ophthalmology journals. Arch Ophthalmol 125(7):952–960
doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.7.952
pubmed: 17620577
Grzybowski A, Shtayer C, Schwartz SG, Moisseiev E (2021) The 100 most cited papers on retinal detachment: a bibliographic perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 6:e000823
Krauthammer M, Moisseiev E (2020) The 100 most cited articles on vitrectomy: a bibliographic perspective. Ophthalmol Retina 4(4):361–368
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.10.016
pubmed: 31956076
Nov E, Moisseiev E (2020) The top 100 most-cited papers on intravitreal injections: a bibliographic perspective. Clin Ophthalmol 14:2757–2772
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S267617
pubmed: 33061258
pmcid: 7519813
Hess RF, Howell ER (1977) The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification. Vision Res 17(9):1049–1055
doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90009-8
pubmed: 595414
McKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA (2003) The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis 3(5):380–405
doi: 10.1167/3.5.5
pubmed: 12875634
Sale A et al (2007) Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition. Nat Neurosci 10(6):679–681
doi: 10.1038/nn1899
pubmed: 17468749
Polat U, Ma-Naim T, Belkin M, Sagi D (2004) Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(17):6692–6697
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401200101
pubmed: 15096608
pmcid: 404107
Levi DM, Klein SA (1985) Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia. Vis Res 25(7):979–991
doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90208-1
pubmed: 4049747
Fu J et al (2014) Prevalence, causes and associations of amblyopia in year 1 students in Central China: the anyang childhood eye study (ACES). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252(1):137–143
doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2451-z
pubmed: 24202959
Kiorpes L, Kiper DC, O’Keefe LP, Cavanaugh JR, Movshon JA (1998) Neuronal correlates of amblyopia in the visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental strabismus and anisometropia. J Neurosci 18(16):6411–6424
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-16-06411.1998
pubmed: 9698332
pmcid: 6793177
Li RW, Ngo C, Nguyen J, Levi DM (2011) Video-game play induces plasticity in the visual system of adults with amblyopia. PLoS Biol 9(8):e1001135
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001135
pubmed: 21912514
pmcid: 3166159
To L et al (2011) A game platform for treatment of amblyopia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19(3):280–289
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2115255
pubmed: 21335317
Campbell FM (1990) National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc 78(4):376–382
pubmed: 2224301
pmcid: 225441
Grzybowski A (2015) Impact factor—benefits and limitations. Acta Ophthalmol 93(3):201–202
doi: 10.1111/aos.12579
pubmed: 25873277
Grzybowski A, Patryn R (2017) Impact factor: universalism and reliability of assessment. Clin Dermatol 35(3):331–334
doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2016.07.012
pubmed: 28511832