A Systematic Review of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Bariatric Research Trials: The Need for More Work.
Bariatric surgery
Patient and public involvement
Research trial
Trial methodology
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
08
05
2022
accepted:
25
08
2022
revised:
20
08
2022
pubmed:
4
9
2022
medline:
1
11
2022
entrez:
3
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient and public involvement (PPI) has gained increased attention in research circles. The consistency of PPI reporting has been addressed by the development of validated checklists such as GRIPP and GRIPP2. The primary aim of this study was to identify the incidence of PPI reporting in bariatric research. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL/Cochrane databases were searched for publications between 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2021 for "bariatric surgery" OR "weight loss surgery" OR "obesity surgery" AND "randomized controlled trials." Ninety studies fulfilled exclusion criteria; two studies reported direct PPI involvement, one indirectly used PPI and one reported not using PPI methods. No other study made direct or indirect mention of PPI. Concluding, that GRIPP2 and PPI reporting in bariatric surgery trials is lacking.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36057021
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06259-7
pii: 10.1007/s11695-022-06259-7
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3740-3751Informations de copyright
© 2022. Crown.
Références
Jones J, Cowe M, Marks S, et al. Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers. Res Involv Eng. 2021;7(1):1–3.
Owyang D, Bakhsh A, Brewer D, et al. Patient and public involvement within orthopaedic research: a systematic review. JBJS. 2021;4:10–2106.
Muir R, Carlini JJ, Harbeck EL, et al. Patient involvement in surgical wound care research: a scoping review. Int Wound J. 2020;17(5):1462–82.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13395
pubmed: 32537915
pmcid: 7948725
Gamble C, Dudley L, Allam A, et al. Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e005234.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005234
pubmed: 25056972
pmcid: 4120322
Brett J, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2014;17(5):637–50.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x
pubmed: 22809132
Partridge N, Scadding J. The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. Lancet. 2004;364(9449):1923–4.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17494-1
pubmed: 15566996
Crocker JC, Pratt-Boyden K, Hislop J, et al. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in UK surgical trials: a survey and focus groups with stakeholders to identify practices, views, and experiences. Trials. 2019;20(1):1–5.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3183-0
Pii KH, Schou LH, Piil K, et al. Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2019;22(1):3–20.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12841
pubmed: 30378234
Staniszewska S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:j3453.
Crocker JC, et al. Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study. Health Expect. 2017;20(3):519–28.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12479
pubmed: 27338242
Gray-Burrows KA, et al. Role of patient and public involvement in implementation research: a consensus study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(10):858–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006954 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006954
pubmed: 29666310
pmcid: 6166593
Price A, Schroter S, Snow R, et al. Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020452.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020452
pubmed: 29572398
pmcid: 5875637
Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358.
Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick JO, et al. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(1):240–53.
doi: 10.1111/jep.12805
pubmed: 29076631
Jones EL, Williams-Yesson BA, Hackett RC, et al. Quality of reporting on patient and public involvement within surgical research: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2015;261(2):243–50.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000768
pubmed: 24950279
Mayer M. Seeking what matters. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. 2012;5(2):71–74.
Bélisle-Pipon J-C, Rouleau G, Birko S. Early-career researchers’ views on ethical dimensions of patient engagement in research. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):21.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0260-y
pubmed: 29514618
pmcid: 5842523