A framework for falsifiable explanations of machine learning models with an application in computational pathology.
Explainable artificial intelligence
Falsifiability
Tumor segmentation
U-Net
Journal
Medical image analysis
ISSN: 1361-8423
Titre abrégé: Med Image Anal
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9713490
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
22
09
2021
revised:
11
08
2022
accepted:
18
08
2022
pubmed:
5
9
2022
medline:
25
10
2022
entrez:
4
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In recent years, deep learning has been the key driver of breakthrough developments in computational pathology and other image based approaches that support medical diagnosis and treatment. The underlying neural networks as inherent black boxes lack transparency and are often accompanied by approaches to explain their output. However, formally defining explainability has been a notorious unsolved riddle. Here, we introduce a hypothesis-based framework for falsifiable explanations of machine learning models. A falsifiable explanation is a hypothesis that connects an intermediate space induced by the model with the sample from which the data originate. We instantiate this framework in a computational pathology setting using hyperspectral infrared microscopy. The intermediate space is an activation map, which is trained with an inductive bias to localize tumor. An explanation is constituted by hypothesizing that activation corresponds to tumor and associated structures, which we validate by histological staining as an independent secondary experiment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36058053
pii: S1361-8415(22)00228-6
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102594
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102594Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.