Safety and efficacy of abacavir for treating infants, children, and adolescents living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Adolescent
Adult
Anti-HIV Agents
/ adverse effects
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cyclopropanes
Dideoxyadenosine
/ analogs & derivatives
HIV Infections
/ drug therapy
Humans
Infant
Nucleosides
/ therapeutic use
Observational Studies as Topic
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Journal
The Lancet. Child & adolescent health
ISSN: 2352-4650
Titre abrégé: Lancet Child Adolesc Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101712925
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
03
04
2022
revised:
29
06
2022
accepted:
30
06
2022
pubmed:
5
9
2022
medline:
21
9
2022
entrez:
4
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Abacavir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor recommended in paediatric HIV care. We assessed the safety and efficacy profile of abacavir used in first, second, or subsequent lines of treatment for infants, children, and adolescents living with HIV to inform 2021 WHO paediatric ART recommendations. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included observational and experimental studies conducted in infants aged 0-1 year, children aged 1-10 years, and adolescents aged 10-19 years living with HIV; with data on safety or efficacy, or both, of abacavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART); published in English or French between Jan 1, 2009, and Oct 1, 2020, plus an updated search to incorporate studies published between Oct 1, 2020, and May 15, 2022. Studies could be non-randomised or non-comparative and include patients who are treatment-naive or those who previously received abacavir (only if abacavir was combined with other ART). Case studies, studies in adults aged 18 years or older, and those assessing the effect of maternal ART exposure were excluded. We extracted data related to study identifier, study design, study period, setting, population characteristics, ART treatment, and safety (any hypersensitivity reaction, death, grade 3 or 4 adverse events, treatment discontinuation, any other morbidities, and serious adverse events), and efficacy outcomes (HIV viral load and CD4 counts reported at 6 and 12 months after ART initiation). Using random-effect models, we estimated weighted pooled incidence and relative risk (RR) of outcomes. The protocol is published in PROSPERO (CRD42022309230). Of 1777 records identified, 1475 (83%) were screened after removing duplicates and a further 1421 (96%) were excluded. Of 54 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 33 (61%) were excluded. Four records were identified from grey literature plus one duplicate from database searching, resulting in 24 studies included (two randomised controlled trials, one single-arm trial, 12 prospective cohorts, seven retrospective cohorts, and two cross-sectional studies). 19 studies described safety data and 15 described efficacy data. 18 (75%) studies were conducted in ART-naive participants. The risk of bias was considered moderate to high for most studies, and all outcomes had significant between-study heterogeneity. Data from 24 265 participants were included, of whom 7236 (30%) received abacavir. Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction was reported in nine (38%) studies, with an incidence ranging from 0·00% to 8·26% (I Toxic effects due to abacavir use remain rare and manageable. Despite scarce data on efficacy, this meta-analysis supports the use of abacavir as a preferred first-line regimen for infants and children living with HIV. WHO.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Abacavir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor recommended in paediatric HIV care. We assessed the safety and efficacy profile of abacavir used in first, second, or subsequent lines of treatment for infants, children, and adolescents living with HIV to inform 2021 WHO paediatric ART recommendations.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included observational and experimental studies conducted in infants aged 0-1 year, children aged 1-10 years, and adolescents aged 10-19 years living with HIV; with data on safety or efficacy, or both, of abacavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART); published in English or French between Jan 1, 2009, and Oct 1, 2020, plus an updated search to incorporate studies published between Oct 1, 2020, and May 15, 2022. Studies could be non-randomised or non-comparative and include patients who are treatment-naive or those who previously received abacavir (only if abacavir was combined with other ART). Case studies, studies in adults aged 18 years or older, and those assessing the effect of maternal ART exposure were excluded. We extracted data related to study identifier, study design, study period, setting, population characteristics, ART treatment, and safety (any hypersensitivity reaction, death, grade 3 or 4 adverse events, treatment discontinuation, any other morbidities, and serious adverse events), and efficacy outcomes (HIV viral load and CD4 counts reported at 6 and 12 months after ART initiation). Using random-effect models, we estimated weighted pooled incidence and relative risk (RR) of outcomes. The protocol is published in PROSPERO (CRD42022309230).
FINDINGS
Of 1777 records identified, 1475 (83%) were screened after removing duplicates and a further 1421 (96%) were excluded. Of 54 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 33 (61%) were excluded. Four records were identified from grey literature plus one duplicate from database searching, resulting in 24 studies included (two randomised controlled trials, one single-arm trial, 12 prospective cohorts, seven retrospective cohorts, and two cross-sectional studies). 19 studies described safety data and 15 described efficacy data. 18 (75%) studies were conducted in ART-naive participants. The risk of bias was considered moderate to high for most studies, and all outcomes had significant between-study heterogeneity. Data from 24 265 participants were included, of whom 7236 (30%) received abacavir. Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction was reported in nine (38%) studies, with an incidence ranging from 0·00% to 8·26% (I
INTERPRETATION
Toxic effects due to abacavir use remain rare and manageable. Despite scarce data on efficacy, this meta-analysis supports the use of abacavir as a preferred first-line regimen for infants and children living with HIV.
FUNDING
WHO.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36058225
pii: S2352-4642(22)00213-9
doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00213-9
pmc: PMC9474298
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Cyclopropanes
0
Nucleosides
0
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
0
Dideoxyadenosine
4Q86AH641A
abacavir
WR2TIP26VS
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
692-704Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests CLT received consultancy fees from WHO and the International AIDS Society. JO received consultancy fees from WHO to develop this meta-analysis. VL received a consultancy contract for the University of Toulouse from WHO to develop and conduct this Review. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
BMC Immunol. 2021 Jul 22;22(1):48
pubmed: 34294032
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 26;15:469
pubmed: 26502899
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2021 Oct;18(5):424-435
pubmed: 34652624
AIDS Alert. 2008 Nov;23(11):128-9
pubmed: 19048648
Indian Pediatr. 2018 Feb 15;55(2):140-141
pubmed: 29242412
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
AIDS. 2015 Sep 24;29(15):2009-23
pubmed: 26355573
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011 May;10(3):389-406
pubmed: 21235431
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Aug;30(8):684-8
pubmed: 21427626
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jan 15;38(2):263-70
pubmed: 14699460
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):256
pubmed: 28399804
Circulation. 2014 Mar 18;129(11):1204-12
pubmed: 24366631
AIDS Res Treat. 2020 Aug 13;2020:6415432
pubmed: 32855823
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Feb;16(2):169-79
pubmed: 26481928
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180645
pubmed: 28686654
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2021 Dec;37(12):930-935
pubmed: 34714103
AIDS. 2022 Mar 15;36(4):611-613
pubmed: 34923516
Indian J Pediatr. 2016 Aug;83(8):855-8
pubmed: 26887762
Pathogens. 2019 Sep 24;8(4):
pubmed: 31554200
AIDS Res Treat. 2013;2013:249171
pubmed: 23533730
AIDS. 2012 Oct 23;26(16):2027-37
pubmed: 22781228
Lancet HIV. 2016 Feb;3(2):e64-75
pubmed: 26847228
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 Aug;32(8):851-5
pubmed: 23860481
S Afr Med J. 2017 Oct 31;107(11):965-975
pubmed: 29262938
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Apr;34(4):406-8
pubmed: 25599283
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Jan;33(1):50-6
pubmed: 23811744
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 20;5(5):ofy086
pubmed: 29766019
BMC Med. 2016 Mar 31;14:61
pubmed: 27036962
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Jun;33(6):617-22
pubmed: 24378944
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;18(1):68-76
pubmed: 25877443
Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):E4
pubmed: 11134468
Indian Pediatr. 2019 Aug 15;56(8):685-686
pubmed: 31477651
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e025874
pubmed: 31551371
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Mar 3;20(1):99
pubmed: 32126978
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2021 Apr 1;31(3):53-59
pubmed: 33044391
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Aug;36(8):761-767
pubmed: 28067719
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Jun;30(6):535-7
pubmed: 21164384
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0169762
pubmed: 28192529
Drug Saf. 2016 Mar;39(3):209-18
pubmed: 26692394
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2018 Aug 17;7(3):e70-e77
pubmed: 29373687