A meta-analysis of clinicopathologic features that predict necrosis or fibrosis at post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in individuals receiving treatment for non-seminoma germ cell tumours.
germinoma
meta-analysis
pathology
teratoma
testicular neoplasms
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
29
04
2022
accepted:
18
07
2022
entrez:
5
9
2022
pubmed:
6
9
2022
medline:
6
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pcRPLND) for residual nodal masses is a critical component of care in metastatic testicular germ cell tumour (GCT). However, the procedure is not of therapeutic value in up to 50% of individuals in whom histopathology demonstrates post-treatment necrosis or fibrosis alone. Improved diagnostic tools and clinicopathologic features are needed to separate individuals who benefit from pcRPLND and avoid surgery in those who do not. A prospectively registered meta-analysis of studies reporting clinicopathologic features associated with teratoma, GCT and/or necrosis/fibrosis at pcRPLND for metastatic non-seminoma GCT (NSGCT) was undertaken. We examined the effect of various clinicopathologic factors on the finding of necrosis/fibrosis at pcRPLND. The log odds ratios (ORs) of each association were pooled using random-effects models. Using the initial search strategy, 4,178 potentially eligible abstracts were identified. We included studies providing OR relating to clinicopathologic factors predicting pcRPLND histopathology, or where individual patient-level data were available to permit the calculation of OR. A total of 31 studies evaluating pcRPLND histopathology in 3,390 patients were eligible for inclusion, including two identified through hand-searching the reference lists of eligible studies. The following were associated with the presence of necrosis/fibrosis at pcRPLND: absence of teratomatous elements in orchidectomy (OR 3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.94-4.17); presence of seminomatous elements at orchidectomy (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.37-5.37); normal pre-chemotherapy serum bHCG (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.62-2.36); normal AFP (OR 3.22, 95% CI 2.49-4.15); elevated LDH (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.37-2.17); >50% change in mass during chemotherapy (OR 4.84, 95% CI 3.94-5.94); and smaller residual mass size (<2 cm In this meta-analysis, clinicopathologic features helped predict the presence of pcRPLND necrosis/fibrosis. Collaboration between centres that provide individual patient-level data is required to develop and validate clinical models and inform routine care to direct pcRPLND to individuals most likely to derive benefits. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021279699.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36059636
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.931509
pmc: PMC9428700
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
931509Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Conduit, Hong, Martin, Thomas, Lawrentschuk, Goad, Grimison, Ahmadi, Tran and Lewin.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
BTr reports grants and personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, grants from Astellas, grants and personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from MSD, grants and personal fees from Ipsen, personal fees from IQVIA, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Tolmar, personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Bayer and personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep 28;10:203
pubmed: 23021209
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 20;371(21):2005-16
pubmed: 25409373
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 10;25(35):5603-8
pubmed: 17998544
Cancer. 1986 Oct 1;58(7):1418-21
pubmed: 2427186
Histopathology. 2021 Mar;78(4):593-606
pubmed: 32970854
Eur Urol. 1984;10(1):10-6
pubmed: 6321194
J Endourol. 2016 May;30(5):510-9
pubmed: 26669219
Asian J Urol. 2021 Jan;8(1):27-37
pubmed: 33569270
Cancer. 1996 Aug 1;78(3):480-6
pubmed: 8697394
J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 10;39(14):1563-1574
pubmed: 33822655
Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2334-2345
pubmed: 31828413
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):217-24
pubmed: 18926622
Br J Cancer. 2003 Mar 24;88(6):843-7
pubmed: 12644820
J Surg Oncol. 1988 Aug;38(4):227-32
pubmed: 2457771
Ann Oncol. 2022 Apr;33(4):362-375
pubmed: 35065204
Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):362-367
pubmed: 27831507
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 1;9(1):15837
pubmed: 31676840
J Clin Oncol. 1990 Oct;8(10):1683-94
pubmed: 2170590
J Clin Oncol. 1987 Apr;5(4):651-6
pubmed: 3104546
Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):867-76
pubmed: 22938868
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Dec;13(12):715-725
pubmed: 27754472
J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 20;36(15):1505-1512
pubmed: 29617189
J Sex Med. 2004 Jul;1(1):58-65
pubmed: 16422984
Urol Oncol. 2019 Nov;37(11):809.e9-809.e18
pubmed: 31540832
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1984 Jun;20(6):727-34
pubmed: 6204875
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1177-87
pubmed: 7537801
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Sep 15;22(18):3713-9
pubmed: 15365067
J Urol. 1987 Jun;137(6):1176-9
pubmed: 3035236
Hum Pathol. 2021 Jun;112:20-34
pubmed: 33798590
Indian J Urol. 2020 Apr-Jun;36(2):112-116
pubmed: 32549662
J Urol. 1976 May;115(5):569-71
pubmed: 178934
Br J Urol. 1985 Dec;57(6):763-8
pubmed: 2417652
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Jun;3(3):382-389
pubmed: 31506250
Ther Adv Urol. 2012 Aug;4(4):187-205
pubmed: 22852029
Urology. 1994 Sep;44(3):392-8; discussion 398-9
pubmed: 8073552
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct;203(4):W415-20
pubmed: 25247970
Urology. 1990 Jun;35(6):537-42
pubmed: 2162091
J Urol. 1989 Mar;141(3):557-9
pubmed: 2918591
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):995-1001
pubmed: 29428550
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 20;38(12):1338-1345
pubmed: 32134699
Cancer. 1985 Jul 15;56(2):249-55
pubmed: 2408728
J Urol. 2001 Jan;165(1):84-8; discussion 88
pubmed: 11125370
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 20;28(30):4649-57
pubmed: 20855830
Urology. 1994 Mar;43(3):349-54
pubmed: 8134989
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):476-482
pubmed: 27234998
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Sep;14(9):E407-E411
pubmed: 32223881
J Urol. 1989 Nov;142(5):1239-42
pubmed: 2478726
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Apr;26:83-87
pubmed: 33997822
World J Urol. 1994;12(4):187-9
pubmed: 7820139
Exp Oncol. 2007 Sep;29(3):212-6
pubmed: 18004247
Urol J. 2011 Spring;8(2):120-6
pubmed: 21656470
Radiology. 1991 Sep;180(3):711-4
pubmed: 1651526
Eur Urol. 2007 Feb;51(2):424-32
pubmed: 16911854
Int J Urol. 2002 Oct;9(10):539-44
pubmed: 12445231
J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1501-4
pubmed: 18186691
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):16-19
pubmed: 33158661
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Sep 1;21(17):3310-7
pubmed: 12947067
Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):437-44
pubmed: 10796922
Br J Cancer. 1993 Jul;68(1):195-200
pubmed: 8318413
J Urol. 2004 May;171(5):1835-8
pubmed: 15076288
J Clin Oncol. 1992 Apr;10(4):569-73
pubmed: 1312586
BJU Int. 2002 Apr;89(6):549-56
pubmed: 11942962
J Urol. 2018 Jul;200(1):126-135
pubmed: 29474847
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;114(8):992-996
pubmed: 27859263
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989 Jan;25(1):35-43
pubmed: 2920767
Br J Urol. 1990 Oct;66(4):425-9
pubmed: 2224438