Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer management.
VMAT
bilateral breast cancer
cancer care
dosimetric analysis
radiotherapy
treatment outcome
treatment planning
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
12
06
2022
accepted:
02
08
2022
entrez:
5
9
2022
pubmed:
6
9
2022
medline:
6
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) exhibits potent advantages regarding target volume coverage and protection of organs at risk, notably in the context of anatomical constraints. Nevertheless, reports concerning VMAT for the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancers (SBBC) have been scarce to date. As such, we conducted this observational study to assess efficacy, safety and feasibility of VMAT in SBBC. From August 2011 to December 2017, 54 consecutive patients with SBBC with or without axillary nodes involvement underwent a treatment protocol containing radiotherapy using VMAT. A total dose (TD) of 52.2Gy in 29 fractions was delivered to breast and internal mammary chain (IMC) nodes Planning Target Volume (PTV) plus, if applicable, a TD of 49.3Gy in 29 fractions to the supra- and infra-clavicular nodes PTV and a TD of 63.22Gy in 29 fractions to tumor boost PTV. Lungs, heart, esophagus, trachea, liver, thyroid and spinal cord were considered as organs at risk. VMAT feasibility and organ at risk sparing were evaluated by treatments planning of the 20 first enrolled patients. Tolerance and patients' outcome were prospectively monitored by acute/late toxicities records and by the analysis of overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Breast, supraclavicular nodes and boost PTV coverage was adequate with at least 98% of PTV encompassed by more than 95% of the prescribed dose. Less than 90% of IMC PTV was encompassed by 95% of the prescribed dose. Mean lung dose was 12.3Gy (range: 7.7 - 18.7); mean heart dose was 10.7Gy (range: 6.2 - 22.3). Concerning acute toxicities, only 2 patients experienced grade 3 skin toxicity (3.7%) and only 1 patient developed grade 1 pneumonitis. After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, grade 2 fibrosis and/or shrinking was observed in 5 patients (10%), and grade 3 fibrosis in 1 patients (2%). The 5-year LRFS-rate, RFS-rate and OS were 98% [95% CI= 86.12-99.70%], 96% [95% CI= 84.63-98.96%] and 100%, respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36059658
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.967479
pmc: PMC9436014
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
967479Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Quesada, Fenoglietto, Gourgou, Lemanski, Draghici, Ailleres, Prunaretty, Azria and Bourgier.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015 Sep-Oct;20(5):398-402
pubmed: 26549999
Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16
pubmed: 22019144
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Med Dosim. 2020 Autumn;45(3):271-277
pubmed: 32122694
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;126(1):131-40
pubmed: 20665107
Breast. 2016 Aug;28:79-83
pubmed: 27253152
Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Nov;21(11):1492-1498
pubmed: 30875061
Med Dosim. 2018 Spring;43(1):55-68
pubmed: 28988893
Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):1499-506
pubmed: 23091290
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 11;11(1):3626
pubmed: 33574446
Radiat Oncol. 2009 Jul 24;4:27
pubmed: 19630947
Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb;29(1):66-70
pubmed: 16462506
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1158-1170
pubmed: 27344114
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Mar 30;15(1):71
pubmed: 32228654
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 15;93(4):845-53
pubmed: 26530753
Radiol Med. 2017 Jun;122(6):464-471
pubmed: 28224401
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Aug 28;7:145
pubmed: 22929062
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 15;76(4):998-1004
pubmed: 19560883
Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Apr;13(4):268-74
pubmed: 21493188