Micro-CT in ophthalmology:

Ocular structures X-ray chemical dehydration contrast agents soft tissue

Journal

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 04 02 2022
accepted: 19 05 2022
entrez: 5 9 2022
pubmed: 6 9 2022
medline: 6 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) provides detailed 3-dimensional (3D) visualization of anatomical structures and encourages morphological reinvestigation of organs with delicate features. The low radiodensity of soft tissues necessitates preceding sample preparation to conduct X-ray imaging with decent contrast between different tissues. In this study, we demonstrate the preparation with three radiopaque agents in combination with elimination of liquids by critical point drying (CPD) introduced for ocular samples. Enucleated porcine eyes were prepared with ethanolic iodine (EI), aqueous iodine-potassium iodide, or ethanolic phosphotungstic acid (EPTA). Micro-CT scans of the samples were conducted in a moist environment with an isotropic resolution of 9.2-12.5 µm voxel size. Subsequently, samples were chemically dehydrated and critical point (CP) dried to conduct a second scan in a dry environment with a resolution up to 4.7-5.4 µm in voxel size. The visualization effects were qualitatively and semi-quantitatively evaluated with regard to the generated contrast between different ocular tissues. All three contrast agents accumulated well in most of the investigated ocular tissues and lead to an increased X-ray attenuation which allowed for differentiated visualization of ocular structures. Problematic agent penetration into the lens was obvious for iodine-potassium iodide and EPTA. Artificial damages of the lens and thickness reduction for the cornea and sclera due to CPD were noticed. The effects of the different contrasting treatments are described and compared with regard to the effects of CPD. Exclusively CP dried samples that were not treated with contrast agents could also be visualized excellently with a good distinction of different ocular structures from each other. All ocular structures can be visualized by micro-CT. To contrast moist samples, the best results were achieved with iodine potassium iodide (IPI). CPD improved the scan quality in all cases. Even without pretreatment with contrasting agents, the CP dried samples showed a contrast similar to the IPI treated samples.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) provides detailed 3-dimensional (3D) visualization of anatomical structures and encourages morphological reinvestigation of organs with delicate features. The low radiodensity of soft tissues necessitates preceding sample preparation to conduct X-ray imaging with decent contrast between different tissues. In this study, we demonstrate the preparation with three radiopaque agents in combination with elimination of liquids by critical point drying (CPD) introduced for ocular samples.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Enucleated porcine eyes were prepared with ethanolic iodine (EI), aqueous iodine-potassium iodide, or ethanolic phosphotungstic acid (EPTA). Micro-CT scans of the samples were conducted in a moist environment with an isotropic resolution of 9.2-12.5 µm voxel size. Subsequently, samples were chemically dehydrated and critical point (CP) dried to conduct a second scan in a dry environment with a resolution up to 4.7-5.4 µm in voxel size. The visualization effects were qualitatively and semi-quantitatively evaluated with regard to the generated contrast between different ocular tissues.
Results UNASSIGNED
All three contrast agents accumulated well in most of the investigated ocular tissues and lead to an increased X-ray attenuation which allowed for differentiated visualization of ocular structures. Problematic agent penetration into the lens was obvious for iodine-potassium iodide and EPTA. Artificial damages of the lens and thickness reduction for the cornea and sclera due to CPD were noticed. The effects of the different contrasting treatments are described and compared with regard to the effects of CPD. Exclusively CP dried samples that were not treated with contrast agents could also be visualized excellently with a good distinction of different ocular structures from each other.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
All ocular structures can be visualized by micro-CT. To contrast moist samples, the best results were achieved with iodine potassium iodide (IPI). CPD improved the scan quality in all cases. Even without pretreatment with contrasting agents, the CP dried samples showed a contrast similar to the IPI treated samples.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36060579
doi: 10.21037/qims-22-109
pii: qims-12-09-4361
pmc: PMC9403582
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

4361-4376

Informations de copyright

2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-22-109/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Sep;39(6):323-35
pubmed: 20729181
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;239(12):968-71
pubmed: 11820704
Biotech Histochem. 2003 Feb;78(1):5-9
pubmed: 12713135
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Jul;11(7):3029-3041
pubmed: 34249632
J Anat. 2016 Jun;228(6):889-909
pubmed: 26970556
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2001 Nov-Dec;42(6):485-95
pubmed: 11768514
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017 Sep;60:120-143
pubmed: 28673870
Vision Res. 2003 Oct;43(22):2363-75
pubmed: 12962993
Dev Dyn. 2011 Oct;240(10):2301-8
pubmed: 21901786
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Jun;82(6):812-848
pubmed: 30786098
BMC Physiol. 2009 Jun 22;9:11
pubmed: 19545439
Ophthalmologe. 2005 Mar;102(3):265-71
pubmed: 15503052
J Comp Neurol. 2015 Jun 1;523(8):1281-95
pubmed: 25728683
Exp Eye Res. 2011 Feb;92(2):104-11
pubmed: 21187085
Dev Dyn. 2009 Mar;238(3):632-40
pubmed: 19235724
J Morphol. 2013 Jul;274(7):759-78
pubmed: 23508935
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170633
pubmed: 28129364
Exp Eye Res. 2014 Aug;125:89-94
pubmed: 24928314
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul;244(7):836-44
pubmed: 16205936
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2014 May;322(3):166-76
pubmed: 24482316
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2019 Feb 28;2019:8617406
pubmed: 30944550
J Anat. 2021 Apr;238(4):1036-1041
pubmed: 33140846
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2016 Dec;233(12):1320-1323
pubmed: 27984837
Exp Eye Res. 2018 Feb;167:51-55
pubmed: 29175499
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):2293-2298
pubmed: 29463748
J Microsc. 2013 Apr;250(1):21-31
pubmed: 23432572
Exp Eye Res. 2021 Feb;203:108394
pubmed: 33310058
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Nov;240(11):906-12
pubmed: 12486512
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Dec;104(6):829-36
pubmed: 17448704

Auteurs

Jens Runge (J)

Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Thomas Stahnke (T)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Institute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials e. V., Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany.

Rudolf F Guthoff (RF)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Andreas Wree (A)

Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Jonas Keiler (J)

Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Classifications MeSH