Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 19 10 2021
accepted: 11 08 2022
entrez: 6 9 2022
pubmed: 7 9 2022
medline: 9 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the major complications of diabetes mellitus and is a significant cause of blindness worldwide. In Uganda, the prevalence of diabetes is approximately 2.7% of the urban population and 1% in rural areas. Many diabetics cannot access an eye exam due to the lack of less costly and user-friendly equipment that primary eye workers can use. Smartphone-based fundus photography allows for a cheap and mobile fundus examination. The study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Portable Eye Examination Kit (PEEK) retina compared to a standard ophthalmic fundus camera (Zeiss Visucam 200) for the diagnosis of DR. From January-March 2020, 286 people with diabetes (type 1 & 2) patients were seen at Kiruddu National referral hospital diabetes clinic. All participants had funduscopy with PEEK retina and the standard ophthalmic fundus camera following ophthalmic examination and pupillary dilation. The PEEK retina's sensitivity, specificity and reliability were determined using an ophthalmic fundus camera as the gold standard. The participants' mean age was 51 with a standard deviation of ±11years, 213 (74.5%) were females, and the majority (93.4%) had Type 2 diabetes. The overall Sensitivity of PEEK retina for DR was 84% (95% CI 70.9-83.5), while the specificity was 79.9% (95% CI 76-83.5) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 30.9% (95% CI 23.2-39.4) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 95.9-99.1). PEEK retina has high sensitivity and specificity, making it suitable for screening and diagnostic purposes. Therefore, we recommend the integration of the PEEK retina in the screening and diagnosis of DR in resource-limited settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36067194
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273633
pii: PONE-D-21-33473
pmc: PMC9447889
doi:

Substances chimiques

Benzophenones 0
Polymers 0
polyetheretherketone 31694-16-3

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0273633

Subventions

Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43 TW011401
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Mar;21(3):405-16
pubmed: 26729021
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;69(11):3148-3149
pubmed: 34708759
Ophthalmology. 2003 Sep;110(9):1677-82
pubmed: 13129861
Retina. 2016 May;36(5):1000-8
pubmed: 26807627
Surv Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(4):347-70
pubmed: 22542913
Ophthalmology. 2015 Oct;122(10):2038-43
pubmed: 26189190
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2016 Apr;5(1):1-4
pubmed: 28604390
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Feb;3(2):146-153
pubmed: 31014763
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1513-1530
pubmed: 27061677
Ophthalmology. 2020 Nov;127(11):1529-1538
pubmed: 32464129
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 13;12:689079
pubmed: 34484113
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 May 1;50(5):S18-S22
pubmed: 31100178
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Jan;87(1):4-14
pubmed: 19896746
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;257(11):2579-2585
pubmed: 31501929
Indian J Community Med. 2011 Oct;36(4):247-52
pubmed: 22279252
Ophthalmol Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):333-346
pubmed: 30415454
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Dec 16;4(1):19-28
pubmed: 25584349
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;46(5):1421-1432
pubmed: 28582528
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Jul 6;21(Suppl 4):259
pubmed: 32631221
J Glaucoma. 2016 Sep;25(9):e777-81
pubmed: 27513903
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 24;10(9):e0138285
pubmed: 26401839
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;134(2):151-8
pubmed: 26606110
IEEE Pulse. 2015 Nov-Dec;6(6):15-7
pubmed: 26583885
Diabetologia. 2014 Dec;57(12):2465-74
pubmed: 25226881
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40-50
pubmed: 28437734
Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Sep;3(9):895-900
pubmed: 8870764
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):60-3
pubmed: 15671192
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2177-80
pubmed: 25570417
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Nov;75(5):790-7
pubmed: 17123967
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 09;4(2):e30
pubmed: 27160779
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;60(5):428-31
pubmed: 22944754

Auteurs

Ahmed Mohamud Yusuf (AM)

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Rebecca Claire Lusobya (RC)

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

John Mukisa (J)

Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Charles Batte (C)

Department of Medicine, Lung Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Damalie Nakanjako (D)

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Otiti Juliet-Sengeri (O)

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH