Hidden biases in clinical decision-making: potential solutions, challenges, and perspectives.
Journal
Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace
ISSN: 1122-0643
Titre abrégé: Monaldi Arch Chest Dis
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9307314
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Sep 2022
07 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
27
05
2022
accepted:
02
09
2022
medline:
14
4
2023
pubmed:
8
9
2022
entrez:
7
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Every day, we must make decisions that range from simple and risk-free to difficult and risky. Our cognitive sources' limitations, as well as the need for speed, can frequently impair the quality and accuracy of our reasoning processes. Indeed, cognitive shortcuts lead us to solutions that are sufficiently satisfying to allow us to make quick decisions. Unfortunately, heuristics frequently misguide us, and we fall victim to biases and systematic distortions of our perceptions and judgments. Because suboptimal diagnostic reasoning processes can have dramatic consequences, the clinical setting is an ideal setting for developing targeted interventions to reduce the rates and magnitude of biases. There are several approaches to bias mitigation, some of which may be impractical. Furthermore, advances in information technology have given us powerful tools for addressing and preventing errors in health care. Recognizing and accepting the role of biases is only the first and unavoidable step toward any effective intervention proposal. As a result, our narrative review aims to present some insights on this contentious topic based on both medical and psychological literature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36069639
doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2022.2339
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM