The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees.
Evaluation
Impact
Patient engagement
Qualitative research
Representation
Journal
Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Sep 2022
07 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
22
02
2022
accepted:
28
08
2022
entrez:
7
9
2022
pubmed:
8
9
2022
medline:
8
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A key component of patient-oriented research is the engagement of patients as partners in the design and conduct of health research. While there is now national infrastructure and networks to support the engagement of patients as partners, there remain calls for promising practices and success stories. In particular, there remains a keen interest in evaluating the impact that patient engagement has on health research studies. We aimed to investigate the impact that patient engagement had on health research conducted in Ontario, Canada. Our sampling frame was studies that were awarded funding by the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 principal investigators, members of research teams, and patient partners. Interviews explored the role of patient partners, the perceived impact of the patient engagement on the study, challenges faced, and advice for other researchers considering patient engagement. Data were analysed using the thematic analysis method with transcripts coded independently by two members of the study team. All coding and subsequent theme generation were discussed until consensus was achieved. There was variation in the methods used to engage patients and other stakeholders, the roles that patients and stakeholders occupied, and where they had input. Interviewees discussed two major areas of impact of patient engagement on research: impact on the study about which they were being interviewed, which tended to relate to improved relevancy of the research to the study population, and impact on themselves which led to changes in their own practice or approaches to future research. Identified challenges to patient engagement included: identifying and reaching patient advisors or patient partners, time-related challenges, and maintaining engagement over the course of the research. There remains a need to further build out the concept of relevancy and how it may be operationalised in practice. Further, the longer-term impacts of patient engagement on researchers and research teams remains under-explored and may reveal additional elements for evaluation. Challenges to patient engagement remain, including identifying and maintaining engagement with partners that reflect the diversity of the population of interest. We interviewed 10 individuals associated with studies that were funded through the Ontario Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Unit. We asked them about how they had engaged patients, families or caregivers in their study, how this engagement had influenced their study, the challenges they faced, and advice for other researchers considering engaging with patients, families and caregivers. We found that patients had been engaged in a variety of ways and at different times. The changes brought about by the patient engagement varied between studies but tended to reflect an improvement in how relevant the study was to patients. Researchers also shared how engagement with patients, families, and caregivers had changed their approaches to future research. Key challenges facing researchers included finding partners that were appropriate for the study, as well making sure that the approach to engagement overcame issues such as financial or logistical barriers that could prevent patients, families or caregivers from partnering with the study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A key component of patient-oriented research is the engagement of patients as partners in the design and conduct of health research. While there is now national infrastructure and networks to support the engagement of patients as partners, there remain calls for promising practices and success stories. In particular, there remains a keen interest in evaluating the impact that patient engagement has on health research studies. We aimed to investigate the impact that patient engagement had on health research conducted in Ontario, Canada.
METHODS
METHODS
Our sampling frame was studies that were awarded funding by the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 principal investigators, members of research teams, and patient partners. Interviews explored the role of patient partners, the perceived impact of the patient engagement on the study, challenges faced, and advice for other researchers considering patient engagement. Data were analysed using the thematic analysis method with transcripts coded independently by two members of the study team. All coding and subsequent theme generation were discussed until consensus was achieved.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There was variation in the methods used to engage patients and other stakeholders, the roles that patients and stakeholders occupied, and where they had input. Interviewees discussed two major areas of impact of patient engagement on research: impact on the study about which they were being interviewed, which tended to relate to improved relevancy of the research to the study population, and impact on themselves which led to changes in their own practice or approaches to future research. Identified challenges to patient engagement included: identifying and reaching patient advisors or patient partners, time-related challenges, and maintaining engagement over the course of the research.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
There remains a need to further build out the concept of relevancy and how it may be operationalised in practice. Further, the longer-term impacts of patient engagement on researchers and research teams remains under-explored and may reveal additional elements for evaluation. Challenges to patient engagement remain, including identifying and maintaining engagement with partners that reflect the diversity of the population of interest.
We interviewed 10 individuals associated with studies that were funded through the Ontario Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Unit. We asked them about how they had engaged patients, families or caregivers in their study, how this engagement had influenced their study, the challenges they faced, and advice for other researchers considering engaging with patients, families and caregivers. We found that patients had been engaged in a variety of ways and at different times. The changes brought about by the patient engagement varied between studies but tended to reflect an improvement in how relevant the study was to patients. Researchers also shared how engagement with patients, families, and caregivers had changed their approaches to future research. Key challenges facing researchers included finding partners that were appropriate for the study, as well making sure that the approach to engagement overcame issues such as financial or logistical barriers that could prevent patients, families or caregivers from partnering with the study.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
We interviewed 10 individuals associated with studies that were funded through the Ontario Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Unit. We asked them about how they had engaged patients, families or caregivers in their study, how this engagement had influenced their study, the challenges they faced, and advice for other researchers considering engaging with patients, families and caregivers. We found that patients had been engaged in a variety of ways and at different times. The changes brought about by the patient engagement varied between studies but tended to reflect an improvement in how relevant the study was to patients. Researchers also shared how engagement with patients, families, and caregivers had changed their approaches to future research. Key challenges facing researchers included finding partners that were appropriate for the study, as well making sure that the approach to engagement overcame issues such as financial or logistical barriers that could prevent patients, families or caregivers from partnering with the study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36071496
doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7
pii: 10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7
pmc: PMC9450365
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
50Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89
pubmed: 24568690
Health Expect. 2005 Dec;8(4):352-9
pubmed: 16266423
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Sep 7;11(9):1703-12
pubmed: 27197911
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Mar;4(2):133-45
pubmed: 25825842
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 27;6:63
pubmed: 33133636
Kidney Int. 2020 Sep;98(3):566-571
pubmed: 32653402
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1075-1084
pubmed: 30062858
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;16(6):670-677
pubmed: 34725926
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 22;4:17
pubmed: 29796308
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Nov 06;4(4):237-246
pubmed: 31413988
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 11;12:18
pubmed: 23496984
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24
pubmed: 16557505
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539
pubmed: 32157777
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206588
pubmed: 30383823
Patient. 2014;7(4):387-95
pubmed: 25034612
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 13;11:1573-1583
pubmed: 28979105
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13
pubmed: 29062538
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jul 31;1:6
pubmed: 29062495
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jun 16;6:30
pubmed: 32550002
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Oct 08;5:28
pubmed: 31608160
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):632-8
pubmed: 26355135
Nephrol Nurs J. 2019 May-Jun;46(3):340-343
pubmed: 31199101
Trials. 2019 Feb 11;20(1):119
pubmed: 30744684
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jan;69(1):11-13
pubmed: 28007186
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 07;6:60
pubmed: 33042576
BMJ. 2015 May 08;350:h2147
pubmed: 25956159