Latency correction in sparse neuronal spike trains.
Latency
Latency Correction
Mice
Rehabilitation
SPIKE-synchronization
SPIKEorder
Simulated Annealing
Spike train analysis
Synfire Indicator
stroke
Journal
Journal of neuroscience methods
ISSN: 1872-678X
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci Methods
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7905558
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2022
01 11 2022
Historique:
received:
11
06
2022
revised:
25
08
2022
accepted:
01
09
2022
pubmed:
9
9
2022
medline:
5
10
2022
entrez:
8
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In neurophysiological data, latency refers to a global shift of spikes from one spike train to the next, either caused by response onset fluctuations or by finite propagation speed. Such systematic shifts in spike timing lead to a spurious decrease in synchrony which needs to be corrected. We propose a new algorithm of multivariate latency correction suitable for sparse data for which the relevant information is not primarily in the rate but in the timing of each individual spike. The algorithm is designed to correct systematic delays while maintaining all other kinds of noisy disturbances. It consists of two steps, spike matching and distance minimization between the matched spikes using simulated annealing. We show its effectiveness on simulated and real data: cortical propagation patterns recorded via calcium imaging from mice before and after stroke. Using simulations of these data we also establish criteria that can be evaluated beforehand in order to anticipate whether our algorithm is likely to yield a considerable improvement for a given dataset. Existing methods of latency correction rely on adjusting peaks in rate profiles, an approach that is not feasible for spike trains with low firing in which the timing of individual spikes contains essential information. For any given dataset the criterion for applicability of the algorithm can be evaluated quickly and in case of a positive outcome the latency correction can be applied easily since the source codes of the algorithm are publicly available.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In neurophysiological data, latency refers to a global shift of spikes from one spike train to the next, either caused by response onset fluctuations or by finite propagation speed. Such systematic shifts in spike timing lead to a spurious decrease in synchrony which needs to be corrected.
NEW METHOD
We propose a new algorithm of multivariate latency correction suitable for sparse data for which the relevant information is not primarily in the rate but in the timing of each individual spike. The algorithm is designed to correct systematic delays while maintaining all other kinds of noisy disturbances. It consists of two steps, spike matching and distance minimization between the matched spikes using simulated annealing.
RESULTS
We show its effectiveness on simulated and real data: cortical propagation patterns recorded via calcium imaging from mice before and after stroke. Using simulations of these data we also establish criteria that can be evaluated beforehand in order to anticipate whether our algorithm is likely to yield a considerable improvement for a given dataset.
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S)
Existing methods of latency correction rely on adjusting peaks in rate profiles, an approach that is not feasible for spike trains with low firing in which the timing of individual spikes contains essential information.
CONCLUSIONS
For any given dataset the criterion for applicability of the algorithm can be evaluated quickly and in case of a positive outcome the latency correction can be applied easily since the source codes of the algorithm are publicly available.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36075286
pii: S0165-0270(22)00229-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109703
pmc: PMC9554712
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Calcium
SY7Q814VUP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109703Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Aug;76(2):1310-26
pubmed: 8871238
Science. 1995 Jun 9;268(5216):1503-6
pubmed: 7770778
Trends Neurosci. 2008 Aug;31(8):428-34
pubmed: 18603311
Science. 2004 Jun 25;304(5679):1926-9
pubmed: 15218136
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Aug;18(4):396-402
pubmed: 18832034
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Oct;15(5):585-92
pubmed: 16140522
Elife. 2017 Dec 27;6:
pubmed: 29280732
J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Oct 15;183(2):287-99
pubmed: 19591867
Cell Rep. 2019 Sep 24;28(13):3474-3485.e6
pubmed: 31553915
Neural Netw. 2021 Sep;141:30-39
pubmed: 33857688
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Sep 15;165(1):151-61
pubmed: 17628690
Neural Comput. 2001 Jun;13(6):1255-83
pubmed: 11387046
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Mar;109(5):1457-72
pubmed: 23221419
J Neurophysiol. 2015 May 1;113(9):3432-45
pubmed: 25744888
J Neurosci Methods. 2006 Apr 15;152(1-2):97-106
pubmed: 16188322
Biol Cybern. 2003 May;88(5):321-34
pubmed: 12750895
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 May 17;17(5):e1008963
pubmed: 33999967
J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Oct 1;308:354-365
pubmed: 30213547
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Oct;66(4 Pt 1):041904
pubmed: 12443232
Neural Netw. 2001 Jul-Sep;14(6-7):589-98
pubmed: 11665755
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Feb;28(2):188-96
pubmed: 24213954
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Sep;11(9):615-27
pubmed: 20725095
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017 Oct 3;7(10):
pubmed: 28348173
Neural Comput. 2001 Apr;13(4):751-63
pubmed: 11255567
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015 Dec;201(12):1103-14
pubmed: 26319311
Cereb Cortex. 2020 May 14;30(5):3055-3073
pubmed: 31828292
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 17;106(11):4471-6
pubmed: 19234116
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jan 30;195(1):92-106
pubmed: 21129402
Nat Neurosci. 2004 May;7(5):456-61
pubmed: 15114358
Neuron. 2016 Apr 6;90(1):165-76
pubmed: 26971946
J Neurosci Methods. 2017 Aug 01;287:25-38
pubmed: 28583477
PLoS Biol. 2013;11(5):e1001558
pubmed: 23667327
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Feb;9(2):97-107
pubmed: 18200026