Discovery and characterization of heterogeneous and multipotent fibroblast populations isolated from excised cleft lip tissue.
Cleft lip/palate
Fibroblasts
Mesenchymal stem cells
Single cell clonal analysis
Journal
Stem cell research & therapy
ISSN: 1757-6512
Titre abrégé: Stem Cell Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101527581
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 09 2022
08 09 2022
Historique:
received:
23
06
2022
accepted:
22
08
2022
entrez:
8
9
2022
pubmed:
9
9
2022
medline:
14
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Regularly discarded lip tissue obtained from corrective surgeries to close the cleft lip represents an easily accessible and rich source for the isolation of primary fibroblasts. Primary fibroblasts have been described to show compelling similarities to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Hence, cleft lip and palate (CLP) lip-derived fibroblasts could be thought as an intriguing cell source for personalized regenerative therapies in CLP-affected patients. Initially, we thoroughly characterized the fibroblastic nature of the lip-derived mesenchymal outgrowths by molecular and functional assays. Next, we compared their phenotype and genotype to that of bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and of human lung-derived fibroblasts WI38, by assessing their morphology, surface marker expression, trilineage differentiation potential, colony-forming (CFU) capacity, and immunomodulation property. Finally, to better decipher the heterogeneity of our CLP cultures, we performed a single cell clonal analysis and tested expanded clones for surface marker expression, as well as osteogenic and CFU potential. We identified intriguingly similar phenotypic and genotypic properties between CLP lip fibroblasts and BM-MSCs, which makes them distinct from WI38. Furthermore, our own data in combination with the complex anatomy of the lip tissue indicated heterogeneity in our CLP cultures. Using a clonal analysis, we discovered single cell-derived clones with increased levels of the MSC markers CD106 and CD146 and clones with variabilities in their commitment to differentiate into bone-forming cells and in their potential to form single cell-derived colonies. However, we were not able to gain clones possessing superior MSC-like capacities when compared to the heterogeneous parental CLP population. Additionally, all clones could still generate contractile forces and retained robust levels of the fibroblast specific marker FSP1, which was not detectable in BM-MSCs. Our results suggest that we isolate heterogeneous populations of fibroblasts from discarded CLP lip tissue, which show a prominently multipotent character in their entirety avoiding the need for elaborate subpopulation selections in vitro. These findings suggest that CLP lip fibroblasts might be a novel potential cell source for personalized regenerative medicine of clinical benefit for CLP patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Regularly discarded lip tissue obtained from corrective surgeries to close the cleft lip represents an easily accessible and rich source for the isolation of primary fibroblasts. Primary fibroblasts have been described to show compelling similarities to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Hence, cleft lip and palate (CLP) lip-derived fibroblasts could be thought as an intriguing cell source for personalized regenerative therapies in CLP-affected patients.
METHODS
Initially, we thoroughly characterized the fibroblastic nature of the lip-derived mesenchymal outgrowths by molecular and functional assays. Next, we compared their phenotype and genotype to that of bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and of human lung-derived fibroblasts WI38, by assessing their morphology, surface marker expression, trilineage differentiation potential, colony-forming (CFU) capacity, and immunomodulation property. Finally, to better decipher the heterogeneity of our CLP cultures, we performed a single cell clonal analysis and tested expanded clones for surface marker expression, as well as osteogenic and CFU potential.
RESULTS
We identified intriguingly similar phenotypic and genotypic properties between CLP lip fibroblasts and BM-MSCs, which makes them distinct from WI38. Furthermore, our own data in combination with the complex anatomy of the lip tissue indicated heterogeneity in our CLP cultures. Using a clonal analysis, we discovered single cell-derived clones with increased levels of the MSC markers CD106 and CD146 and clones with variabilities in their commitment to differentiate into bone-forming cells and in their potential to form single cell-derived colonies. However, we were not able to gain clones possessing superior MSC-like capacities when compared to the heterogeneous parental CLP population. Additionally, all clones could still generate contractile forces and retained robust levels of the fibroblast specific marker FSP1, which was not detectable in BM-MSCs.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that we isolate heterogeneous populations of fibroblasts from discarded CLP lip tissue, which show a prominently multipotent character in their entirety avoiding the need for elaborate subpopulation selections in vitro. These findings suggest that CLP lip fibroblasts might be a novel potential cell source for personalized regenerative medicine of clinical benefit for CLP patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36076255
doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03154-x
pii: 10.1186/s13287-022-03154-x
pmc: PMC9461253
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
469Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Cell. 2021 Jul 22;184(15):3852-3872
pubmed: 34297930
J Cell Physiol. 2008 Feb;214(2):413-21
pubmed: 17654479
Am J Pathol. 2010 Oct;177(4):2011-21
pubmed: 20724594
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(4):407-13
pubmed: 17349597
J Transl Med. 2005 May 12;3(1):21
pubmed: 15890077
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Apr;44(2):129-33
pubmed: 15961201
Stem Cells. 2014 Jun;32(6):1408-19
pubmed: 24578244
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Jul;30(4):376-81
pubmed: 8399265
Development. 1991 Jun;112(2):627-37
pubmed: 1724419
Stem Cells. 2008 Jan;26(1):146-50
pubmed: 17932423
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Dec;13(4):305-10
pubmed: 21087398
Stem Cells. 2005 Feb;23(2):220-9
pubmed: 15671145
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019 Feb;13(2):319-327
pubmed: 30644640
Stem Cells Dev. 2011 Jan;20(1):53-66
pubmed: 20528146
J Exp Med. 1972 Apr 1;135(4):719-34
pubmed: 4336123
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Jun 10;9:682944
pubmed: 34179013
Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Sep;3(9):778-84
pubmed: 11533656
Stem Cells. 2012 Dec;30(12):2746-59
pubmed: 22949105
Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;180(3):151-8
pubmed: 16260861
Development. 2004 Oct;131(19):4637-50
pubmed: 15358668
Acta Histochem. 2000 Nov;102(4):381-9
pubmed: 11145531
Bone. 2003 Dec;33(6):919-26
pubmed: 14678851
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009 Feb 20;379(4):1114-9
pubmed: 19161980
Commun Biol. 2020 Apr 23;3(1):188
pubmed: 32327715
Acta Haematol. 2016;136(2):85-97
pubmed: 27188909
Cytotherapy. 2019 Oct;21(10):1019-1024
pubmed: 31526643
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018 Jan 2;8(1):
pubmed: 28348178
Dev Dyn. 2006 May;235(5):1152-66
pubmed: 16292776
Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2005 Aug;Chapter 28:Unit 28.3
pubmed: 18265368
Nat Genet. 2005 Oct;37(10):1099-103
pubmed: 16142235
Haematologica. 2006 Aug;91(8):1017-26
pubmed: 16870554
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jan;42(1):83-92
pubmed: 15643921
J Cell Physiol. 2018 Dec;233(12):9099-9109
pubmed: 29943820
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 11;9(1):1761
pubmed: 30741963
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 9;10(1):4290
pubmed: 32152403
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018 Mar 1;9(1):52
pubmed: 29490668
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Sep;34 Suppl 2:57-61
pubmed: 17071393
Cell. 1994 Mar 25;76(6):1063-73
pubmed: 8137423
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:162-182
pubmed: 30623455
Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:652034
pubmed: 22685475
Cell. 2007 Jun 29;129(7):1377-88
pubmed: 17604725
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 Oct 27;8(1):239
pubmed: 29078802
Cytotherapy. 2016 Feb;18(2):151-9
pubmed: 26724220
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Dec 11;8:587859
pubmed: 33363145
Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315-7
pubmed: 16923606
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Sep;42(5):526-32
pubmed: 16149835
Eur J Oral Sci. 2017 Oct;125(5):315-337
pubmed: 28833567
Front Physiol. 2018 Nov 29;9:1703
pubmed: 30555344
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 5;97(25):13625-30
pubmed: 11087820
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Aug 18;9:661532
pubmed: 34490235
Front Immunol. 2012 Jul 02;3:182
pubmed: 22783256
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020 Jul;77(14):2771-2794
pubmed: 31965214
Exp Dermatol. 2008 Nov;17(11):925-32
pubmed: 18557932
Cell Res. 2012 Feb;22(2):288-304
pubmed: 22231630
Cytotechnology. 1989 Aug;2(3):171-9
pubmed: 22358731
Stem Cells. 2003;21(4):481-94
pubmed: 12832701
Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 05;10:166
pubmed: 30890950
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Aug 27;6(251):251ra119
pubmed: 25163479
Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970 Oct;3(4):393-403
pubmed: 5523063
Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2014 Mar;102(1):74-82
pubmed: 24677724
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;8(1-2):109-15
pubmed: 4450102
Biol Cell. 2011 Apr;103(4):197-208
pubmed: 21332447
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1993:71-78
pubmed: 31148079
Arch Plast Surg. 2017 May;44(3):188-193
pubmed: 28573092
Cell. 2021 Jul 22;184(15):4090-4104.e15
pubmed: 34129837
N Biotechnol. 2015 Jan 25;32(1):199-211
pubmed: 24929129
J Transl Med. 2018 Jul 27;16(1):212
pubmed: 30053821
Acta Histochem. 2020 Dec;122(8):151634
pubmed: 33059115
RNA. 2009 Mar;15(3):357-61
pubmed: 19147696
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 26;5(4):e10088
pubmed: 20436665
Mol Cell. 2012 Jul 27;47(2):169-82
pubmed: 22795133
Transfusion. 2018 Jun;58(6):1434-1440
pubmed: 29582436
Circ Res. 2004 Jul 9;95(1):9-20
pubmed: 15242981
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Mar;72(3):312-7
pubmed: 23241795
Angle Orthod. 2006 Sep;76(5):810-6
pubmed: 17029515
Ann Hematol. 2012 Aug;91(8):1175-86
pubmed: 22395436
Tissue Eng. 2002 Jul;8(3):441-52
pubmed: 12167230
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 Dec 6;8(1):275
pubmed: 29208029
Am J Pathol. 2012 Jun;180(6):2462-78
pubmed: 22546478
Front Immunol. 2020 Feb 18;11:243
pubmed: 32133010
J Cell Sci. 2007 Aug 15;120(Pt 16):2875-83
pubmed: 17652163
Transplantation. 1974 Apr;17(4):331-40
pubmed: 4150881
Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 May;16(5):1491-501
pubmed: 20001268
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Mar;12(3):167-78
pubmed: 21331089
Blood. 1991 Jul 1;78(1):55-62
pubmed: 2070060