As Easy as 1, 2, 3? How to Determine CBCT Frequency in Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy.
adjuvant breast radiotherapy
cone-beam computed tomography
image-guided radiation therapy
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Aug 2022
27 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
24
07
2022
revised:
25
08
2022
accepted:
26
08
2022
entrez:
9
9
2022
pubmed:
10
9
2022
medline:
10
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The current study aims to assess the suitability of setup errors during the first three treatment fractions to determine cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) frequency in adjuvant breast radiotherapy. For this, 45 breast cancer patients receiving non-hypofractionated radiotherapy after lumpectomy, including a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the tumor bed and daily CBCT imaging, were retrospectively selected. In a first step, mean and maximum setup errors on treatment days 1-3 were correlated with the mean setup errors during subsequent treatment days. In a second step, dose distribution was estimated using a dose accumulation workflow based on deformable image registration, and setup errors on treatment days 1-3 were correlated with dose deviations in the clinical target volumes (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR). No significant correlation was found between mean and maximum setup errors on treatment days 1-3 and mean setup errors during subsequent treatment days. In addition, mean and maximum setup errors on treatment days 1-3 correlated poorly with dose coverage of the CTVs and dose to the OARs. Thus, CBCT frequency in adjuvant breast radiotherapy should not be determined solely based on the magnitude of setup errors during the first three treatment fractions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36077701
pii: cancers14174164
doi: 10.3390/cancers14174164
pmc: PMC9454766
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018 Jan-Feb;23(1):61-67
pubmed: 29379398
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jan;118(1):205-8
pubmed: 26791404
Radiat Oncol J. 2018 Mar;36(1):54-62
pubmed: 29621873
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 May 06;14(3):4085
pubmed: 23652243
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(2):259-66
pubmed: 18850335
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):452-478
pubmed: 32259783
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Aug 01;63(15):155014
pubmed: 29978832
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Feb 7;52(3):685-705
pubmed: 17228114
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2018 Mar;49(1):23-30
pubmed: 30479283
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Apr;62(2):262-269
pubmed: 29071800
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 01;13(7):
pubmed: 33916047
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Aug 3;16(1):143
pubmed: 34344403
J Med Phys. 2015 Oct-Dec;40(4):220-5
pubmed: 26865758
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 15;94(4):850-7
pubmed: 26972658
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;43(7):459-468
pubmed: 32452841
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jun;61(3):394-401
pubmed: 27863010
Breast Care (Basel). 2015 Feb;10(1):44-9
pubmed: 25960725
Br J Radiol. 2019 Apr;92(1096):20180383
pubmed: 30433821
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Mar;20(3):97-104
pubmed: 30861276
Med Phys. 2014 Mar;41(3):031703
pubmed: 24593707
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 1;83(2):712-9
pubmed: 22099037
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 30;11(1):17378
pubmed: 34462489
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun 12;14:43-50
pubmed: 32566769