DNA Karyometry for Automated Detection of Cancer Cells.

Fanconi anemia automated microscope-based screening cancer cell detection computer assisted diagnosis grading prostate cancer oral smears supervised machine learning

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 02 08 2022
revised: 24 08 2022
accepted: 25 08 2022
entrez: 9 9 2022
pubmed: 10 9 2022
medline: 10 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background: Microscopical screening of cytological samples for the presence of cancer cells at high throughput with sufficient diagnostic accuracy requires highly specialized personnel which is not available in most countries. Methods: Using commercially available automated microscope-based screeners (MotiCyte and EasyScan), software was developed which is able to classify Feulgen-stained nuclei into eight diagnostically relevant types, using supervised machine learning. the nuclei belonging to normal cells were used for internal calibration of the nuclear DNA content while nuclei belonging to those suspicious of being malignant were specifically identified. The percentage of morphologically abnormal nuclei was used to identify samples suspected of malignancy, and the proof of DNA-aneuploidy was used to definitely determine the state malignancy. A blinded study was performed using oral smears from 92 patients with Fanconi anemia, revealing oral leukoplakias or erythroplakias. In an earlier study, we compared diagnostic accuracies on 121 serous effusion specimens. In addition, using a blinded study employing 80 patients with prostate cancer who were under active surveillance, we aimed to identify those whose cancers would not advance within 4 years. Results: Applying a threshold of the presence of >4% of morphologically abnormal nuclei from oral squamous cells and DNA single-cell or stemline aneuploidy to identify samples suspected of malignancy, an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.3% was found as compared with 75.0% accuracy determined by conventional subjective cytological assessment using the same slides. Accuracy of automated screening effusions was 84.3% as compared to 95.9% of conventional cytology. No prostate cancer patients under active surveillance, revealing DNA-grade 1, showed progress of their disease within 4.1 years. Conclusions: An automated microscope-based screener was developed which is able to identify malignant cells in different types of human specimens with a diagnostic accuracy comparable with subjective cytological assessment. Early prostate cancers which do not progress despite applying any therapy could be identified using this automated approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36077750
pii: cancers14174210
doi: 10.3390/cancers14174210
pmc: PMC9454816
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

J Histochem Cytochem. 1979 Jan;27(1):136-43
pubmed: 374568
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Jun;128(6):403-413
pubmed: 32022466
Cancer. 2009 Jun 25;117(3):228-35
pubmed: 19373897
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1987 Oct;9(5):449-54
pubmed: 3314894
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):126-31
pubmed: 19917860
Cancer Cytopathol. 2019 Feb;127(1):18-25
pubmed: 30339327
Cancer. 2004 Dec 25;102(6):373-9
pubmed: 15526273
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004 Jan-Mar;28(1-2):87-98
pubmed: 15127753
Cell Oncol. 2005;27(1):33-41
pubmed: 15750205
Cytopathology. 2018 Jun;29(3):267-274
pubmed: 29578257
Mol Cytogenet. 2015 Apr 18;8:28
pubmed: 25897325
Anal Cell Pathol. 2003;25(4):159-66
pubmed: 14501082
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1995 Feb;17(1):1-7
pubmed: 7766264
Cytopathology. 1997 Oct;8(5):298-312
pubmed: 9313982
Anal Cell Pathol. 1998;17(4):201-8
pubmed: 10391372
Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 Jan;47(1):20-27
pubmed: 29603675
Anal Cell Pathol. 2001;23(2):89-95
pubmed: 11904464
Am J Clin Pathol. 1994 Feb;101(2):220-9
pubmed: 8116579
Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):101-7
pubmed: 22980443
Cancer. 2004 Feb 25;102(1):41-54
pubmed: 14968417
Anal Cell Pathol. 1998;17(4):189-200
pubmed: 10391371

Auteurs

Alfred Böcking (A)

Institute of Cytopathology, University Clinics, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

David Friedrich (D)

AstraZeneca, 80636 München, Germany.

Martin Schramm (M)

Department of Cytopathology, Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Branko Palcic (B)

Cancer Imaging Department, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V7H2X4, Canada.

Gregor Erbeznik (G)

Noki Medical d.o.o., 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Classifications MeSH