Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Gait Training Combined with Robotic Balance Training in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

balance end-effector device rehabilitation robot-assisted gait training stroke

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 25 07 2022
revised: 24 08 2022
accepted: 27 08 2022
entrez: 9 9 2022
pubmed: 10 9 2022
medline: 10 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recently, the use of robotic technology in gait and balance rehabilitation of stroke patients has been introduced, with positive results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic gait and trunk rehabilitation compared to robotic gait training alone on balance, activities, and participation measures in patients with subacute stroke. The study was a randomized, controlled, single blind, parallel group clinical trial. Thirty-six patients with first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke event were enrolled, and they were randomized in two groups: Gait Group (GG), where they received only robotic treatment for gait rehabilitation through an end-effector system, and Gait/Trunk Group (GTG) where they performed end-effector gait rehabilitation and balance with a robotic platform, 3 times/week for 12 sessions/month. At the end of the study, there was an improvement in balance ability in both groups. Instead, the lower limb muscle strength and muscle tone significantly improved only in the GTG group, where we found a significant reduction in the trunk oscillations and displacement during dynamic exercises more than the GG group. The robotic platform which was added to the gait robotic treatment offers more intense and controlled training of the trunk that positively influences the tone and strength of lower limb muscles.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36079092
pii: jcm11175162
doi: 10.3390/jcm11175162
pmc: PMC9457020
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169
pubmed: 27145936
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Sep;25(7):636-44
pubmed: 21444654
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Aug;55(4):433-441
pubmed: 30543267
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:417-422
pubmed: 31374665
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 17;8:CD002840
pubmed: 28815562
Clin Rehabil. 2000 Dec;14(6):618-26
pubmed: 11128737
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Apr 15;14:19
pubmed: 32351377
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Mar;26(3):237-45
pubmed: 21971750
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Apr;8(4):308-9
pubmed: 19296917
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;51(6):745-53
pubmed: 26138089
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):453-61
pubmed: 25467393
Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 13;10:865
pubmed: 31572282
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015 Jul;23(4):636-42
pubmed: 25850089
Stroke. 2008 Jun;39(6):1786-92
pubmed: 18467648
Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2218-9
pubmed: 16888262
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):845-9
pubmed: 25931744
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;24(6):530-9
pubmed: 17971632
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007 Nov;109(9):763-9
pubmed: 17766038
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Mar 31;13:35
pubmed: 27037035
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2007;30(2):43-8
pubmed: 18171486
Gait Posture. 2015 Jun;42(1):73-8
pubmed: 26005188
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jan;232(1):31-42
pubmed: 24212255
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Jul 29;16(1):99
pubmed: 31358017
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):341-6
pubmed: 17353462
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 May;27(5):1459-62
pubmed: 26157240
Brain Inj. 2008 Jun;22(6):451-6
pubmed: 18465386
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):87-100
pubmed: 24710969
Front Neurol. 2020 Jun 17;11:494
pubmed: 32625162
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 May 15;13:1303-1311
pubmed: 28553117
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;99(4):641-651
pubmed: 29102438
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 24;2020:9153174
pubmed: 32047819
NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;45(2):201-212
pubmed: 31498139
BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 28;16:12
pubmed: 26818847
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Dec;55(6):710-721
pubmed: 30723189
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):331-40
pubmed: 23389743
Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;94(1):9-13
pubmed: 23813084
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Aug;40(17):1981-1988
pubmed: 28482696
NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(1):37-41
pubmed: 30741699
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2019 Dec;40(7-8):329-332
pubmed: 32304370
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Mar;8(2):161-8
pubmed: 22992166
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(4):775-782
pubmed: 28946585
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Apr 11;15(1):32
pubmed: 29642921
Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;26 Suppl 1:S329-40
pubmed: 26406020

Auteurs

Irene Aprile (I)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy.

Carmela Conte (C)

Laboratorio di Analisi del Movimento, Policlinico Italia Piazza del Campidano 6, 00162 Rome, Italy.

Arianna Cruciani (A)

High Intensity Neurorehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Cristiano Pecchioli (C)

Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00166 Rome, Italy.

Letizia Castelli (L)

High Intensity Neurorehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Sabina Insalaco (S)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy.

Marco Germanotta (M)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy.

Chiara Iacovelli (C)

Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH