Change in Physical and Mental Quality-of-Life between the Short- and Mid-Term Periods after Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Minimum 5 Years Follow-up.
cervical spondylotic myelopathy
decompression
deterioration
improvement
laminoplasty
mid-term
outcome
quality-of-life
spinal surgery
well-being
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Sep 2022
04 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
11
08
2022
revised:
31
08
2022
accepted:
02
09
2022
entrez:
9
9
2022
pubmed:
10
9
2022
medline:
10
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The mid-term surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), evaluated using the cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association (cJOA) score, are reported to be satisfactory. However, there remains room for improvement in quality-of-life (QOL), especially after short-term follow-up. We aimed to demonstrate changes in mental and physical QOL between short- and mid-term follow-ups and determine the predictive factors for deterioration of QOL. In this retrospective cohort study, 80 consecutive patients underwent laminoplasty for CSM. The outcome measures were Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS), and cJOA scores. PCS and MCS scores were compared at the 2- and 5-year postoperative time points. Additionally, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the predictive factors for deterioration. Significant factors in the logistic regression analysis were analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic curves. The results showed that MCS scores did not deteriorate after 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.912). Meanwhile, PCS significantly declined between 2 and 5 years postoperatively (p = 0.008). cJOA scores at 2 years postoperatively were significantly associated with PCS deterioration at 2-year follow-up. In conclusion, only physical QOL might show deterioration after short-term follow-up. Such deterioration is likely in patients with a cJOA score <13.0 at 2 years postoperatively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36079160
pii: jcm11175230
doi: 10.3390/jcm11175230
pmc: PMC9457037
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):2998-3005
pubmed: 17172996
BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1437-40
pubmed: 8518639
Spine J. 2021 Jul;21(7):1110-1117
pubmed: 33640583
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 15;40(12):E675-93
pubmed: 25839387
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 15;45(10):E568-E575
pubmed: 31770327
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3130-9
pubmed: 11124729
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 20;99(18):e99
pubmed: 28926393
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):794-810
pubmed: 18287602
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Oct;11(4):402-12
pubmed: 19929335
Spine J. 2016 Sep;16(9):1062-9
pubmed: 27154836
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):903-12
pubmed: 9817107
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Jul 01;20(4):284-291
pubmed: 29450446
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Mar 1;19(5):507-10
pubmed: 8184342
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 18;95(18):1651-8
pubmed: 24048552
Global Spine J. 2014 Aug;4(3):169-74
pubmed: 25083358
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Oct;8(7):693-9
pubmed: 6420895
World Health Forum. 1996;17(4):354-6
pubmed: 9060228
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Mar 26;13:39
pubmed: 25889912
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 1;43(21):E1260-E1266
pubmed: 29652783
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):942-951
pubmed: 33687463
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 1;26(5):479-87
pubmed: 11242374
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2247-52
pubmed: 24108289
Bone Jt Open. 2021 May;2(5):344-350
pubmed: 34044582
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3192-9
pubmed: 11124736
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Sep;25(3):352-6
pubmed: 27153141
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Mar 1;46(5):E303-E309
pubmed: 33156277
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1037-44
pubmed: 9817121