Midterm results of pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty: good outcomes after posttraumatic osteonecrosis without malunion of the tuberosities.

Interposition arthroplasty Posttraumatic osteonecrosis Pyrocarbon Pyrolytic carbon Shoulder arthroplasty Traumatic sequelae

Journal

JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
entrez: 9 9 2022
pubmed: 10 9 2022
medline: 10 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In vitro data demonstrate the potential benefits of the pyrocarbon as a bearing material against cartilage or bone. And pyrocarbon-free interposition arthroplasty has been used with positive outcomes for over 10 years for hand and wrist joint replacements. This study reports the midterm results of a Pyrocarbon Interposition Shoulder Arthroplasty (PISA) in primary and secondary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and in avascular osteonecrosis. This prospective noncontrolled, multicenter study included 67 consecutive patients who underwent PISA in France and Sweden. A cohort of 48 patients, aged 50 ± 12 years, was available for clinical assessment at a mean follow-up of 67.6 ± 9.3 months. A favorable change was reported with a mean absolute Constant score improvement of 32 ± 20 points. The highest Constant score improvement was observed in patients with avascular osteonecrosis (42 ± 18 points; The radiographic findings seem to confirm the interest of pyrocarbon in preserving bony surfaces. But the risk of tuberosity thinning suggests considering the use of PISA with caution in most degenerative glenohumeral joint pathologies, although the midterm outcomes highlight PISA as a suitable solution for patients presenting with posttraumatic osteonecrosis without malunion of the tuberosities and with an intact rotator cuff.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
In vitro data demonstrate the potential benefits of the pyrocarbon as a bearing material against cartilage or bone. And pyrocarbon-free interposition arthroplasty has been used with positive outcomes for over 10 years for hand and wrist joint replacements. This study reports the midterm results of a Pyrocarbon Interposition Shoulder Arthroplasty (PISA) in primary and secondary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and in avascular osteonecrosis.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This prospective noncontrolled, multicenter study included 67 consecutive patients who underwent PISA in France and Sweden.
Results UNASSIGNED
A cohort of 48 patients, aged 50 ± 12 years, was available for clinical assessment at a mean follow-up of 67.6 ± 9.3 months. A favorable change was reported with a mean absolute Constant score improvement of 32 ± 20 points. The highest Constant score improvement was observed in patients with avascular osteonecrosis (42 ± 18 points;
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The radiographic findings seem to confirm the interest of pyrocarbon in preserving bony surfaces. But the risk of tuberosity thinning suggests considering the use of PISA with caution in most degenerative glenohumeral joint pathologies, although the midterm outcomes highlight PISA as a suitable solution for patients presenting with posttraumatic osteonecrosis without malunion of the tuberosities and with an intact rotator cuff.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36081691
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.007
pii: S2666-6383(22)00112-8
pmc: PMC9446222
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

787-794

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

Références

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Jun;98(4 Suppl):S41-7
pubmed: 22583895
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;13(6):604-13
pubmed: 15570228
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jan;20(1):123-30
pubmed: 20797877
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 1;98(11):893-9
pubmed: 27252433
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 May;29(5):e185-e195
pubmed: 31924515
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Dec;30(12):2886-2894
pubmed: 34175466
Chir Main. 2000 Nov;19(5):276-85
pubmed: 11147202
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jan;29(1):202-209
pubmed: 31492619
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jul;26(7):1298-1306
pubmed: 28209327
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1):102756
pubmed: 33316450
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Feb;25(2):238-45
pubmed: 26350879
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jul;22(7):894-900
pubmed: 23312293
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Mar;71(2):189-97
pubmed: 2925733
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Aug;29(8):1703-1711
pubmed: 32414609
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Jul;39(6):587-95
pubmed: 23461909
J Wrist Surg. 2012 Nov;1(2):159-64
pubmed: 24179721
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Mar;25(3):406-12
pubmed: 26589918
Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 11;5:4855
pubmed: 25209333
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sep;28(9):1666-1673
pubmed: 31202630
Eur Cell Mater. 2019 Jan 7;37:1-15
pubmed: 30614513
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Apr;31(4):755-762
pubmed: 34555523
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Dec 5;94(23):e1711-10
pubmed: 23224391
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jan;442:121-30
pubmed: 16394750
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Jun;107(4):102896
pubmed: 33753266
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):798-803
pubmed: 27887871
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jan;29(1):e1-e10
pubmed: 31451348
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 12;10(14):
pubmed: 34300247
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Oct;141(10):1639-1648
pubmed: 33025070
Orthopade. 2017 Dec;46(12):1034-1044
pubmed: 29080060
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91(2):340-9
pubmed: 19181978
JSES Open Access. 2018 Dec 24;3(1):37-42
pubmed: 30976734
Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2009;19(4):319-38
pubmed: 19817708
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Dec;12(1 Suppl):31-39
pubmed: 33343714
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Sep;14(6):756-60
pubmed: 10512449
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jan;31(1):113-122
pubmed: 34280573
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Sep;22(9):1199-208
pubmed: 23385083
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2016 Sep;35(4):255-261
pubmed: 27781988
Int Orthop. 2016 Jul;40(7):1465-71
pubmed: 26493390
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Dec;12(1 Suppl):11-22
pubmed: 33343712
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):2361-2369
pubmed: 33677116
Acta Orthop. 2020 Jul 17;:1-6
pubmed: 32677862
Int Orthop. 2019 Jun;43(6):1479-1486
pubmed: 30269184
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jul;26(7):1143-1151
pubmed: 28214173
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 Nov;44(9):887-897
pubmed: 31483683
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 21;100(22):1934-1948
pubmed: 30480598
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2018 Jun;37(3):129-154
pubmed: 29628356
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;14(2):114-20
pubmed: 15789002

Auteurs

Jérôme Garret (J)

Clinique du Parc, Lyon, France.

Arnaud Godenèche (A)

Hôpital Privé J Mermoz Ramsay-GDS-Centre orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.

Pascal Boileau (P)

Institut Universitaire Locomoteur & Sport, Hôpital Pasteur 2, UR2CA, Côte d'Azur University, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.

Daniel Molé (D)

Centre ARTICS, Chirurgie des Articulations et du Sport, Nancy, France.
SAS Pasteur, Clinique Louis Pasteur, Essey-lès-Nancy, France.

Mikael Etzner (M)

Department of Orthopaedics, Hallands Hospital Varberg, Varberg, Sweden.

Luc Favard (L)

Service d'Orthopédie Traumatologie, CHRU Trousseau, Faculté de Médecine de Tours, Université de Tours, Chambray-les-Tours, France.

Christophe Lévigne (C)

Clinique du Parc, Lyon, France.

François Sirveaux (F)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.

Gilles Walch (G)

Hôpital Privé J Mermoz Ramsay-GDS-Centre orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.

Classifications MeSH