Quantifying Vegetation Biophysical Variables from Imaging Spectroscopy Data: A Review on Retrieval Methods.

Imaging spectroscopy Inversion Machine learning Parametric and nonparametric regression Radiative transfer models Retrieval Uncertainties Vegetation properties

Journal

Surveys in geophysics
ISSN: 0169-3298
Titre abrégé: Surv Geophys
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101659560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
entrez: 9 9 2022
pubmed: 1 1 2019
medline: 1 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

An unprecedented spectroscopic data stream will soon become available with forthcoming Earth-observing satellite missions equipped with imaging spectroradiometers. This data stream will open up a vast array of opportunities to quantify a diversity of biochemical and structural vegetation properties. The processing requirements for such large data streams require reliable retrieval techniques enabling the spatiotemporally explicit quantification of biophysical variables. With the aim of preparing for this new era of Earth observation, this review summarizes the state-of-the-art retrieval methods that have been applied in experimental imaging spectroscopy studies inferring all kinds of vegetation biophysical variables. Identified retrieval methods are categorized into: (1) parametric regression, including vegetation indices, shape indices and spectral transformations; (2) nonparametric regression, including linear and nonlinear machine learning regression algorithms; (3) physically based, including inversion of radiative transfer models (RTMs) using numerical optimization and look-up table approaches; and (4) hybrid regression methods, which combine RTM simulations with machine learning regression methods. For each of these categories, an overview of widely applied methods with application to mapping vegetation properties is given. In view of processing imaging spectroscopy data, a critical aspect involves the challenge of dealing with spectral multicollinearity. The ability to provide robust estimates, retrieval uncertainties and acceptable retrieval processing speed are other important aspects in view of operational processing. Recommendations towards new-generation spectroscopy-based processing chains for operational production of biophysical variables are given.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36081834
doi: 10.1007/s10712-018-9478-y
pmc: PMC7613341
mid: EMS152618
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

589-629

Subventions

Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 755617
Pays : International

Références

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0169867
pubmed: 28103307
New Phytol. 2011 Jan;189(2):375-94
pubmed: 21083563
Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):221-4
pubmed: 24499816
New Phytol. 2015 Oct;208(2):608-24
pubmed: 26083501
Neural Comput. 1997 Nov 15;9(8):1735-80
pubmed: 9377276
Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2016 Mar;36(3):800-5
pubmed: 27400527
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Mar 08;17(3):
pubmed: 28282884
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2014 Dec;119(12):2312-2327
pubmed: 27398266
Ecol Appl. 2009 Apr;19(3):553-70
pubmed: 19425416
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2017 Apr 18;28(4):1128-1136
pubmed: 29741308
J Exp Bot. 2013 Apr;64(7):1817-27
pubmed: 23564955
J Environ Qual. 2002 Sep-Oct;31(5):1433-41
pubmed: 12371159
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Oct 24;14(11):20078-111
pubmed: 25347588
Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(7):7063-81
pubmed: 22164004
Sci China Life Sci. 2011 Mar;54(3):272-81
pubmed: 21416328
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 15;110(3):E185-92
pubmed: 23213258
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Aug 06;13(8):10027-51
pubmed: 23925082
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 17;9(6):e97910
pubmed: 24937407
Sensors (Basel). 2008 Mar 28;8(4):2136-2160
pubmed: 27879814
J Med Chem. 1999 Aug 12;42(16):3183-7
pubmed: 10447964

Auteurs

Jochem Verrelst (J)

Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, Universitat de València, Paterna, València 46980, Spain.

Zbyněk Malenovský (Z)

Surveying and Spatial Sciences Group, School of Technology, Environments and Design, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 76, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.
Remote Sensing Department, Global Change Research Institute CAS, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300 Brno, Czech Republic.
USRA/GESTAR, Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA.

Christiaan Van der Tol (C)

Department of Water Resources, Faculty ITC, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.

Gustau Camps-Valls (G)

Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, Universitat de València, Paterna, València 46980, Spain.

Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry (JP)

Centre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère - UPS, CNES, CNRS, IRD, Université de Toulouse, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.

Philip Lewis (P)

Department of Geography, University College London, Pearson Building, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, UK.
National Centre for Earth Observation, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Leicester, Michael Atiyah Building, LE1 7RH Leicester, UK.

Peter North (P)

Department of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.

Jose Moreno (J)

Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, Universitat de València, Paterna, València 46980, Spain.

Classifications MeSH