Policy space and pro-health equity national policymaking: a case study of Myanmar during political transition (2006-16).
Policy space
health equity
policy analysis
policymaking
political transition
sustainable development goals
Journal
Health policy and planning
ISSN: 1460-2237
Titre abrégé: Health Policy Plan
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2023
13 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
08
05
2022
revised:
17
08
2022
accepted:
04
10
2022
pubmed:
10
9
2022
medline:
15
2
2023
entrez:
9
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Health equity is central to achieving sustainable development goals and COVID-19 has emphasized its importance. Ensuring health equity is prominent in policy discussions and decision-making is a critical challenge in all countries. Understanding the policy space for actors to promote health equity in the policy process may help to strengthen prioritization of equity in policy and programme discussions and decisions. Authors developed a conceptual framework for policy space based on a narrative literature review. This comprised five key elements and their associated factors, i.e. context, policy circumstances, policy characteristics, actor engagement and policy spaces. Authors then applied it in Myanmar during a period of political transition, using a qualitative case study design. Findings showed that political transition provided an important 'policy window' to develop more equitable health policy in Myanmar. Changing policy circumstances offered opportunities for advancing pro-equity policy. However, lack of visibility of health equity and long-standing inequalities were important challenges to policy space. Within a changing context, actors at individual and organizational levels used a range of policy spaces to advance pro-equity health policy. Learning from using the framework in Myanmar was incorporated into a revised framework. Application of this revised framework could provide valuable insights into the opportunities to promote a pro-health equity approach across policy and programme discussions and decision-making for actors trying to promote equity in other transition and non-transition contexts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36083012
pii: 6694850
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac076
pmc: PMC9494378
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
170-180Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S13
pubmed: 23819874
Lancet. 2013 Jun 15;381(9883):2118-33
pubmed: 23574803
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):328-38
pubmed: 18658197
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1368-78
pubmed: 18248864
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jun;54(11):1637-56
pubmed: 12113446
Health Policy Plan. 2018 May 1;33(4):611-621
pubmed: 29471544
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl 1:i29-47
pubmed: 25217355
Eff Health Care. 1983 Dec;1(4):179-85
pubmed: 10310519
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):339-50
pubmed: 18653676
Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1370-9
pubmed: 17933652
Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429-45
pubmed: 1644507
Health Econ. 2002 Dec;11(8):659-66
pubmed: 12457367
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Dec;9(4):353-70
pubmed: 10139469
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Jul;29(4):466-74
pubmed: 23749651
Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:167-94
pubmed: 16533114
Int J Equity Health. 2011 Nov 18;10:55
pubmed: 22099141
Soc Sci Med. 2006 May;62(9):2125-36
pubmed: 16289737
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(1):80-8
pubmed: 19853342
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):254-8
pubmed: 12646539
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Aug;45(3):449-63
pubmed: 9232739
Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29(1):5-7
pubmed: 29053554
Health Policy. 2010 Aug;96(3):200-9
pubmed: 20189676
J Health Econ. 1993 Dec;12(4):431-57
pubmed: 10131755
Health Hum Rights. 2010 Dec 15;12(2):31-48
pubmed: 21178188
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Sep 1;93(9):591-591A
pubmed: 26478619