Randomized controlled trial of EndoRings assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy.
colonic neoplasm
colonic polyp
colonoscopy
human
randomized controlled trial
Journal
Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society
ISSN: 1443-1661
Titre abrégé: Dig Endosc
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9101419
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
14
03
2022
accepted:
06
09
2022
pubmed:
11
9
2022
medline:
11
3
2023
entrez:
10
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The EndoRings device is a distal attachment consisting of two layers of circular flexible rings that evert mucosal folds. The aim of this study was to investigate whether EndoRing assisted colonoscopy (ER) improves polyp and adenoma detection compared to standard colonoscopy (SC). Multicenter, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. Total of 556 patients randomized to ER (n = 275) or SC (n = 281). Colonoscopy completed in 532/556 (96%) cases. EndoRings removed in 74/275 (27%) patients. Total number of polyps in ER limb 582 vs. 515 in SC limb, P = 0.04. Total number of adenomas in ER limb 361 vs. 343 for SC limb, P = 0.49. A statistically significant difference in the mean number of polyps per patient in both the intention to treat (1.84 SC vs. 2.10 ER, P = 0.027) and per protocol (PP) (1.84 SC vs. 2.25 ER, P = 0.004). Our study shows promise for the EndoRings device to improve polyp detection.
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
354-360Subventions
Organisme : EndoAid
Informations de copyright
© 2022 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
Références
Williet N, Tournier Q, Vernet C et al. Effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 846-60.
Thayalasekaran S, Alkandari A, Varytimiadis L et al. To cap/cuff or ring: Do distal attachment devices improve the adenoma detection? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 13: 119-27.
Dik VK, Gralnek IM, Segol O et al. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy - Results of the CLEVER study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 1151-8.
Hassan C, Senore C, Manes G et al. Diagnostic yield and miss rate of EndoRings in an organized colorectal cancer screening program: The SMART (Study Methodology for ADR-Related Technology) trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 583-90.
Rex DK, Repici A, Gross SA et al. High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 335-44.
Ekkelenkamp VE, Dowler K, Valori RM, Dunckley P. Patient comfort and quality in colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 2355-61.
Rex DK, Kessler WR, Sagi SV et al. Impact of a ring-fitted cap on insertion time and adenoma detection: A randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 115-20.
Bhattacharyya R, Chedgy F, Kandiah K et al. Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK bowel cancer screening programme (E-cap study): A randomized trial. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 1043-50.
van Doorn SC, van der Vlugt M, Depla A et al. Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut 2017; 66: 438-45.
van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: A systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 343-50.
Floer M, Biecker E, Fitzlaff R et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy - A randomized controlled multicenter trial. PLoS One 2014; 9: e114267.
Biecker E, Floer M, Heinecke A et al. Novel Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49: 413-8.