Head-to-head comparison of 10 plasma phospho-tau assays in prodromal Alzheimer's disease.
Alzheimer’s disease
amyloid-β
blood p-tau
dementia
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 04 2023
19 04 2023
Historique:
received:
27
06
2022
revised:
01
08
2022
accepted:
20
08
2022
medline:
21
4
2023
pubmed:
11
9
2022
entrez:
10
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Plasma phospho-tau (p-tau) species have emerged as the most promising blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Here, we performed a head-to-head comparison of p-tau181, p-tau217 and p-tau231 measured using 10 assays to detect abnormal brain amyloid-β (Aβ) status and predict future progression to Alzheimer's dementia. The study included 135 patients with baseline diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (mean age 72.4 years; 60.7% women) who were followed for an average of 4.9 years. Seventy-one participants had abnormal Aβ-status (i.e. abnormal CSF Aβ42/40) at baseline; and 45 of these Aβ-positive participants progressed to Alzheimer's dementia during follow-up. P-tau concentrations were determined in baseline plasma and CSF. P-tau217 and p-tau181 were both measured using immunoassays developed by Lilly Research Laboratories (Lilly) and mass spectrometry assays developed at Washington University (WashU). P-tau217 was also analysed using Simoa immunoassay developed by Janssen Research and Development (Janss). P-tau181 was measured using Simoa immunoassay from ADxNeurosciences (ADx), Lumipulse immunoassay from Fujirebio (Fuji) and Splex immunoassay from Mesoscale Discovery (Splex). Both p-tau181 and p-tau231 were quantified using Simoa immunoassay developed at the University of Gothenburg (UGOT). We found that the mass spectrometry-based p-tau217 (p-tau217WashU) exhibited significantly better performance than all other plasma p-tau biomarkers when detecting abnormal Aβ status [area under curve (AUC) = 0.947; Pdiff < 0.015] or progression to Alzheimer's dementia (AUC = 0.932; Pdiff < 0.027). Among immunoassays, p-tau217Lilly had the highest AUCs (0.886-0.889), which was not significantly different from the AUCs of p-tau217Janss, p-tau181ADx and p-tau181WashU (AUCrange 0.835-0.872; Pdiff > 0.09), but higher compared with AUC of p-tau231UGOT, p-tau181Lilly, p-tau181UGOT, p-tau181Fuji and p-tau181Splex (AUCrange 0.642-0.813; Pdiff ≤ 0.029). Correlations between plasma and CSF values were strongest for p-tau217WashU (R = 0.891) followed by p-tau217Lilly (R = 0.755; Pdiff = 0.003 versus p-tau217WashU) and weak to moderate for the rest of the p-tau biomarkers (Rrange 0.320-0.669). In conclusion, our findings suggest that among all tested plasma p-tau assays, mass spectrometry-based measures of p-tau217 perform best when identifying mild cognitive impairment patients with abnormal brain Aβ or those who will subsequently progress to Alzheimer's dementia. Several other assays (p-tau217Lilly, p-tau217Janss, p-tau181ADx and p-tau181WashU) showed relatively high and consistent accuracy across both outcomes. The results further indicate that the highest performing assays have performance metrics that rival the gold standards of Aβ-PET and CSF. If further validated, our findings will have significant impacts in diagnosis, screening and treatment for Alzheimer's dementia in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36087307
pii: 6695388
doi: 10.1093/brain/awac333
pmc: PMC10115176
doi:
Substances chimiques
tau Proteins
0
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1592-1601Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS095773
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG068398
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Références
Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):131-44
pubmed: 20157306
Science. 2021 Aug 6;373(6555):626-628
pubmed: 34353941
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):387-397
pubmed: 32123386
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):1034-1042
pubmed: 34031605
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
EMBO Mol Med. 2022 Jan 11;14(1):e14408
pubmed: 34859598
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Mar 17;12(1):26
pubmed: 32183883
Acta Neuropathol. 2022 Apr;143(4):487-503
pubmed: 35195758
Lancet. 2016 Jul 30;388(10043):505-17
pubmed: 26921134
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015 May;36(5):297-309
pubmed: 25840462
Acta Neuropathol. 2021 May;141(5):709-724
pubmed: 33585983
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):954-963
pubmed: 34083813
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Nov 1;78(11):1375-1382
pubmed: 34542571
J Exp Med. 2020 Nov 2;217(11):
pubmed: 32725127
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021 Mar 27;13(1):68
pubmed: 33773595
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):772-781
pubmed: 32722745
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Aug;21(8):726-734
pubmed: 35643092
J Intern Med. 2004 Sep;256(3):183-94
pubmed: 15324362
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):1108-1117
pubmed: 34309632
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021 May 27;13(1):e12204
pubmed: 34095436
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 3;11(1):1683
pubmed: 32246036
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Feb;18(2):283-293
pubmed: 34151519
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2022 May;9(5):734-746
pubmed: 35502634
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Sep;20(9):739-752
pubmed: 34418401
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Aug;14(8):989-997
pubmed: 29626426
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021 Dec 4;13(1):198
pubmed: 34863295
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):379-386
pubmed: 32123385
Lancet Neurol. 2020 May;19(5):422-433
pubmed: 32333900
J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21(4):1119-28
pubmed: 21504133
Ann Neurol. 2022 Apr;91(4):548-560
pubmed: 35084051
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022 Apr 05;14(1):e12307
pubmed: 35415202
Clin Mass Spectrom. 2019 Jul 15;14 Pt B:74-82
pubmed: 34917763
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):398-407
pubmed: 32161412
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 May 14;14(1):67
pubmed: 35568889