Psychological responses, mental health, and sense of agency for the dual challenges of climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic in young people in the UK: an online survey study.


Journal

The Lancet. Planetary health
ISSN: 2542-5196
Titre abrégé: Lancet Planet Health
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101704339

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 14 05 2021
revised: 17 06 2022
accepted: 13 07 2022
pubmed: 11 9 2022
medline: 14 9 2022
entrez: 10 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic and climate change are both significant and pressing global challenges, posing threats to public health and wellbeing. Young people are particularly vulnerable to the distress both crises can cause, but understanding of the varied psychological responses to both issues is poor. We aimed to investigate these responses and their links with mental health conditions and feelings of agency. We conducted an online survey between Aug 5 and Oct 26, 2020, targeting a diverse sample of young people (aged 16-24 years, n=530) in the UK. The survey was distributed using a combination of a survey panel (panel sample) and direct approaches to youth groups and schools who shared the survey with young people in their networks (community sample). We collected data on respondents' psychological responses to both climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic, their sense of agency to respond to each crisis, and the range of impacts on their lives. We also collected demographics data and screened for mental health and wellbeing indicators. We used non-parametric tests for most statistical comparisons. For paired samples, we used Wilcoxon's signed-rank test, and used Mann-Whitney U-tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests for two or more independent samples. Summed scale scores were considered as interval-level data and analysed with Student's t tests and ANOVAs. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen's d and partial eta-squared (η· After excluding 18 suspected bots and 94 incomplete responses, 530 responses were retained for analysis. Of the 518 respondents who provided demographic data, 63% were female, 71·4% were White, and the mean family affluence score was 8·22 (SD 2·29). Most participants (n=343; 70%) did not report a history of diagnosis or treatment for a mental health disorder, but mental health scores indicated a common experience of (relatively mild) symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress. Although UK youth reported more life disruption and concern for their future due to the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change was associated with significantly greater distress overall, particularly for individuals with low levels of generalised anxiety. The COVID-19 pandemic was more associated with feelings of anxiety, isolation, disconnection, and frustration; distress around loss and grief; and effects on quality of life. Climate change was more likely to evoke emotions such as interest and engagement, guilt, shame, anger, and disgust. The greater distress attributed to climate change overall was due, in particular, to higher levels of guilt, sense of personal responsibility, and greater distress triggered by upsetting media coverage. Agency to address climate change was associated with greater climate distress, but pandemic-related distress and agency were unrelated. The COVID-19 pandemic and climate change are affecting the wellbeing of UK young people in distinct ways, with implications for health service, policy, and research responses. There is a need for mental health practitioners, policy makers, and other societal actors to account for the complex relationship between climate agency, distress, and mental wellbeing in young people. Imperial College London.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic and climate change are both significant and pressing global challenges, posing threats to public health and wellbeing. Young people are particularly vulnerable to the distress both crises can cause, but understanding of the varied psychological responses to both issues is poor. We aimed to investigate these responses and their links with mental health conditions and feelings of agency.
METHODS
We conducted an online survey between Aug 5 and Oct 26, 2020, targeting a diverse sample of young people (aged 16-24 years, n=530) in the UK. The survey was distributed using a combination of a survey panel (panel sample) and direct approaches to youth groups and schools who shared the survey with young people in their networks (community sample). We collected data on respondents' psychological responses to both climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic, their sense of agency to respond to each crisis, and the range of impacts on their lives. We also collected demographics data and screened for mental health and wellbeing indicators. We used non-parametric tests for most statistical comparisons. For paired samples, we used Wilcoxon's signed-rank test, and used Mann-Whitney U-tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests for two or more independent samples. Summed scale scores were considered as interval-level data and analysed with Student's t tests and ANOVAs. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen's d and partial eta-squared (η·
FINDINGS
After excluding 18 suspected bots and 94 incomplete responses, 530 responses were retained for analysis. Of the 518 respondents who provided demographic data, 63% were female, 71·4% were White, and the mean family affluence score was 8·22 (SD 2·29). Most participants (n=343; 70%) did not report a history of diagnosis or treatment for a mental health disorder, but mental health scores indicated a common experience of (relatively mild) symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress. Although UK youth reported more life disruption and concern for their future due to the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change was associated with significantly greater distress overall, particularly for individuals with low levels of generalised anxiety. The COVID-19 pandemic was more associated with feelings of anxiety, isolation, disconnection, and frustration; distress around loss and grief; and effects on quality of life. Climate change was more likely to evoke emotions such as interest and engagement, guilt, shame, anger, and disgust. The greater distress attributed to climate change overall was due, in particular, to higher levels of guilt, sense of personal responsibility, and greater distress triggered by upsetting media coverage. Agency to address climate change was associated with greater climate distress, but pandemic-related distress and agency were unrelated.
INTERPRETATION
The COVID-19 pandemic and climate change are affecting the wellbeing of UK young people in distinct ways, with implications for health service, policy, and research responses. There is a need for mental health practitioners, policy makers, and other societal actors to account for the complex relationship between climate agency, distress, and mental wellbeing in young people.
FUNDING
Imperial College London.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36087603
pii: S2542-5196(22)00172-3
doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00172-3
pmc: PMC9451498
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e726-e738

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Références

Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
QJM. 2020 May 1;113(5):311-312
pubmed: 32227218
BMJ. 2021 Mar 10;372:n614
pubmed: 33692087
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64
pubmed: 32799105
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 22;10:230
pubmed: 30853924
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 09;18(2):
pubmed: 33435348
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Aug;4(8):e312-e314
pubmed: 32702296
BJPsych Int. 2015 May 01;12(2):31-32
pubmed: 29093844
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 02;11:577684
pubmed: 33132986
Child Indic Res. 2016;9:233-245
pubmed: 26925177
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):281-295
pubmed: 34079068
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul;14(7):488-501
pubmed: 23783199
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892
pubmed: 32707037
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 13;109:110236
pubmed: 33373680
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Oct;4(10):e435-e436
pubmed: 32918865
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 16;18(2):
pubmed: 33467018
Risk Anal. 2014 May;34(5):937-48
pubmed: 24219420
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 04;8(9):e74708
pubmed: 24023958
Curr Psychol. 2022 Feb 28;:1-14
pubmed: 35250241
J Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Nov;57(11):1759-1764
pubmed: 34792244
Front Public Health. 2020 May 29;8:241
pubmed: 32574307
Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Jul;10(4):767-785
pubmed: 35846172
World Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;20(2):200-221
pubmed: 34002494
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 May;137:437-443
pubmed: 33774538
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Dec;5(12):e863-e873
pubmed: 34895496
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2021 Mar;8(1):1-6
pubmed: 33389625

Auteurs

Emma L Lawrance (EL)

Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK; Grantham Institute-Climate Change and Environment, Imperial College London, London, UK; Mental Health Innovations, London, UK. Electronic address: e.lawrance@imperial.ac.uk.

Neil Jennings (N)

Grantham Institute-Climate Change and Environment, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Vasiliki Kioupi (V)

Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Rhiannon Thompson (R)

School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

James Diffey (J)

Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Ans Vercammen (A)

Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK; School of Communication and Arts, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QSL, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH