Chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.


Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
received: 09 05 2022
revised: 07 08 2022
accepted: 11 08 2022
pubmed: 12 9 2022
medline: 19 10 2022
entrez: 11 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recent studies suggest improvements in response to salvage chemotherapy (CT) after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in several types of cancer. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge after ICI, compared with second-line chemotherapy without previous ICI in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). In this multicentre retrospective study, we included all patients with la/mUC initiating second or third-line chemotherapy from January 2015 to June 2020. We compared patients treated with second-line chemotherapy without previous ICI (CT2) and patients treated with third-line chemotherapy after ICI (CT3). The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) in CT3 compared with CT2. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities. Overall, 553 patients were included. ORRs were 31.0% (95% CI, 26.5 to 35.5) and 29.2% (95% CI, 21.9 to 36.6), respectively, in CT2 and CT3, with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.62). In subgroup analyses, no differences in ORR were observed by Bellmunt risk group, type of chemotherapy (platinum or taxanes), duration of response to first-platinum-based chemotherapy (< or ≥ 12 months) or FGFR-status. Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.9 to 5.1) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.5) in CT2 and CT3, respectively, and grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 35.0% and 22.4% of patients. This large multicentre retrospective study provides clinically relevant real-world data. Chemotherapy re-challenge after ICI in la/mUC achieves ORR and PFS comparable with those obtained in CT2 with an acceptable safety profile. These updated results offer more promising outcomes than historically reported with second-line chemotherapy data.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Recent studies suggest improvements in response to salvage chemotherapy (CT) after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in several types of cancer. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge after ICI, compared with second-line chemotherapy without previous ICI in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC).
METHODS
In this multicentre retrospective study, we included all patients with la/mUC initiating second or third-line chemotherapy from January 2015 to June 2020. We compared patients treated with second-line chemotherapy without previous ICI (CT2) and patients treated with third-line chemotherapy after ICI (CT3). The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) in CT3 compared with CT2. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities.
RESULTS
Overall, 553 patients were included. ORRs were 31.0% (95% CI, 26.5 to 35.5) and 29.2% (95% CI, 21.9 to 36.6), respectively, in CT2 and CT3, with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.62). In subgroup analyses, no differences in ORR were observed by Bellmunt risk group, type of chemotherapy (platinum or taxanes), duration of response to first-platinum-based chemotherapy (< or ≥ 12 months) or FGFR-status. Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.9 to 5.1) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.5) in CT2 and CT3, respectively, and grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 35.0% and 22.4% of patients.
CONCLUSION
This large multicentre retrospective study provides clinically relevant real-world data. Chemotherapy re-challenge after ICI in la/mUC achieves ORR and PFS comparable with those obtained in CT2 with an acceptable safety profile. These updated results offer more promising outcomes than historically reported with second-line chemotherapy data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36088671
pii: S0959-8049(22)00491-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.08.014
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 0
Taxoids 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

43-53

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Lucie Meynard (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: lucie.meynard@gmail.com.

Derek Dinart (D)

University Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Epicene Team, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Inserm CIC1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.

Blandine Delaunay (B)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Régaud, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

Aude Fléchon (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Carolina Saldana (C)

AP-HP, Hopital Henri Mondor, Service d'Oncologie, Univ Paris Est Creteil, TRePCa, F-94010 Creteil, France.

Félix Lefort (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Gwenaëlle Gravis (G)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France.

Mathilde Cancel (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Tours, France.

Elodie Coquan (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

Sylvain Ladoire (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.

Denis Maillet (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Lyon, France.

Frédéric Rolland (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France.

Elouen Boughalem (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France.

Sophie Martin (S)

Department of Medical Oncology Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France.

Mathieu Laramas (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Laurence Crouzet (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

Baptiste Abbar (B)

Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (iPLESP), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Universitaire de Cancérologie, CLIP(2) Galilée, Paris, France.

Sabrina Falkowski (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Clinique François Chénieux, Limoges, France.

Damien Pouessel (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Régaud, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

Guilhem Roubaud (G)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH