Indian female migrants face greater barriers to post-Covid recovery than males: Evidence from a panel study.

Covid-19 pandemic Domestic migrants India food insecurity labour markets panel

Journal

EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 24 05 2022
revised: 02 08 2022
accepted: 09 08 2022
entrez: 12 9 2022
pubmed: 13 9 2022
medline: 13 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

India's abrupt nationwide Covid-19 lockdown internally displaced millions of migrant workers, who returned to distant rural homes. Documenting their labour market reintegration is a critical aspect of understanding the economic costs of the pandemic for India's poor. In a country marked by low and declining female labour force participation, identifying gender gaps in labour market reintegration - as a marker of both women's vulnerability at times of crisis and setbacks in women's agency - is especially important. Yet most studies of pandemic-displaced internal migrants in India are small, rely on highly selected convenience samples, and lack a gender focus. Beginning in April 2020 we enrolled roughly 4,600 displaced migrants who had, during the lockdown, returned to two of India's poorest states into a cohort observational study which tracked enrolees through July 2021. Survey respondents were randomly selected from the states' official databases of return migrants, with sampling stratified by state and gender. 85% of enrolees (3950) were working prior to the pandemic. Our difference-in-means analysis uses three survey waves conducted in July to August 2020, January to March 2021, and June to July 2021. Our analysis focuses on a balanced panel of 1780 previously working enrolees (the 45% of respondents present in the first wave that also participated in the subsequent two survey rounds). Primary outcomes of interest include labour market re-entry, earnings, and measures of vulnerability by gender. Before the March 2020 national lockdown, 98% (95% CI [97,99]) of workers were employed in the non-agricultural sector. In July 2020, one month after the end of the lockdown, incomes plummet, with both genders earning roughly 17% of their pre-pandemic incomes. 47% (95% CI [45,49]) were employed in agriculture and 37% (95% CI [35,39]) were unemployed. Remigration is critical to regaining income - by January 2021, male re-migrants report earnings on par with their pre-pandemic incomes, while men remaining in rural areas earn only 23% (95% CI [19,27]) of their pre-pandemic income. Remigration benefits women to a lesser extent - female re-migrants regain no more than 65% (95% CI [57,73]) of their pre-pandemic income at any point. Yet men and women struggle to remigrate throughout - by July 2021, no more than 63% (95% CI [60,66]) of men and 55% (95% CI [51,59]) of women had left their home villages since returning. Gender gaps in income recovery largely reflect higher rates of unemployment among women, both among those remaining in rural areas (9 percentage points (95% CI [6,13]) higher than men across waves) and among those who remigrate (13 percentage points (95% CI [9,17]) higher than men across waves). As a result, we observe gender gaps in well-being: relative to male counterparts, women across waves were 7 percentage points (95% CI [4,10]) more likely to report reduced consumption of essential goods and fared 6 percentage points (95% CI [4,7]) worse on a food insecurity index. Displaced migrants of both genders experienced persistent hardships for over a year after the initial pandemic lockdown. Women fare worse, driven by both lower rates of remigration and lower rates of labour market re-entry both inside and outside home villages. Some women drop out of the labour force entirely, but most unemployed report seeking or being available to work. In short, pandemic-induced labour market displacement has far-reaching, long-term consequences for migrant workers, especially women. Survey costs were funded by research grants from IZA/FCDO Gender, Growth, and Labour Markets in Low Income Countries Programme, J-PAL Jobs and Opportunity Initiative, and the Evidence-based Measures of Empowerment for Research on Gender Equality (EMERGE) program at University of California San Diego.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
India's abrupt nationwide Covid-19 lockdown internally displaced millions of migrant workers, who returned to distant rural homes. Documenting their labour market reintegration is a critical aspect of understanding the economic costs of the pandemic for India's poor. In a country marked by low and declining female labour force participation, identifying gender gaps in labour market reintegration - as a marker of both women's vulnerability at times of crisis and setbacks in women's agency - is especially important. Yet most studies of pandemic-displaced internal migrants in India are small, rely on highly selected convenience samples, and lack a gender focus.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Beginning in April 2020 we enrolled roughly 4,600 displaced migrants who had, during the lockdown, returned to two of India's poorest states into a cohort observational study which tracked enrolees through July 2021. Survey respondents were randomly selected from the states' official databases of return migrants, with sampling stratified by state and gender. 85% of enrolees (3950) were working prior to the pandemic. Our difference-in-means analysis uses three survey waves conducted in July to August 2020, January to March 2021, and June to July 2021. Our analysis focuses on a balanced panel of 1780 previously working enrolees (the 45% of respondents present in the first wave that also participated in the subsequent two survey rounds). Primary outcomes of interest include labour market re-entry, earnings, and measures of vulnerability by gender.
Findings UNASSIGNED
Before the March 2020 national lockdown, 98% (95% CI [97,99]) of workers were employed in the non-agricultural sector. In July 2020, one month after the end of the lockdown, incomes plummet, with both genders earning roughly 17% of their pre-pandemic incomes. 47% (95% CI [45,49]) were employed in agriculture and 37% (95% CI [35,39]) were unemployed. Remigration is critical to regaining income - by January 2021, male re-migrants report earnings on par with their pre-pandemic incomes, while men remaining in rural areas earn only 23% (95% CI [19,27]) of their pre-pandemic income. Remigration benefits women to a lesser extent - female re-migrants regain no more than 65% (95% CI [57,73]) of their pre-pandemic income at any point. Yet men and women struggle to remigrate throughout - by July 2021, no more than 63% (95% CI [60,66]) of men and 55% (95% CI [51,59]) of women had left their home villages since returning. Gender gaps in income recovery largely reflect higher rates of unemployment among women, both among those remaining in rural areas (9 percentage points (95% CI [6,13]) higher than men across waves) and among those who remigrate (13 percentage points (95% CI [9,17]) higher than men across waves). As a result, we observe gender gaps in well-being: relative to male counterparts, women across waves were 7 percentage points (95% CI [4,10]) more likely to report reduced consumption of essential goods and fared 6 percentage points (95% CI [4,7]) worse on a food insecurity index.
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
Displaced migrants of both genders experienced persistent hardships for over a year after the initial pandemic lockdown. Women fare worse, driven by both lower rates of remigration and lower rates of labour market re-entry both inside and outside home villages. Some women drop out of the labour force entirely, but most unemployed report seeking or being available to work. In short, pandemic-induced labour market displacement has far-reaching, long-term consequences for migrant workers, especially women.
Funding UNASSIGNED
Survey costs were funded by research grants from IZA/FCDO Gender, Growth, and Labour Markets in Low Income Countries Programme, J-PAL Jobs and Opportunity Initiative, and the Evidence-based Measures of Empowerment for Research on Gender Equality (EMERGE) program at University of California San Diego.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36090455
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101631
pii: S2589-5370(22)00361-3
pmc: PMC9444279
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101631

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Indian J Labour Econ. 2021;64(3):787-802
pubmed: 34483508
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:52-56
pubmed: 32771661
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;67(7):826-829
pubmed: 32594816
J Dev Econ. 2022 May;156:102839
pubmed: 35221446
Indian J Psychol Med. 2021 Nov;43(6):473-478
pubmed: 35210674
Econ Polit (Bologna). 2022;39(1):101-128
pubmed: 35422579
Econ Polit (Bologna). 2022;39(1):75-100
pubmed: 35422589
Indian J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul-Aug;62(4):363-369
pubmed: 33165355
Lancet. 2022 Jun 25;399(10344):2381-2397
pubmed: 35247311
Indian J Labour Econ. 2020;63(4):1021-1039
pubmed: 33250596
Indian J Labour Econ. 2020;63(4):969-997
pubmed: 33106737
Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(1):11-40
pubmed: 33488316
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2007 Nov;60(Pt 2):217-44
pubmed: 17971268
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Dec;54:102254
pubmed: 32593122
J Public Aff. 2021 Nov;21(4):e2470
pubmed: 33041654
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Jul;28(Suppl 2):307-320
pubmed: 34219998
Indian J Labour Econ. 2020 Oct 6;:1-4
pubmed: 33041545
Gender Issues. 2021;38(4):395-419
pubmed: 33132690

Auteurs

Jenna Allard (J)

Inclusion Economics at Yale University and MacMillan Center, Yale University; 34 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

Maulik Jagnani (M)

Department of Economics, University of Colorado Denver, 1380 Lawrence Street, Denver, CO 80204, USA.

Yusuf Neggers (Y)

Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, 735 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Rohini Pande (R)

Department of Economics and Economic Growth Center, Yale University; 27 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

Simone Schaner (S)

Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California; 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.

Charity Troyer Moore (CT)

Inclusion Economics at Yale University and MacMillan Center, Yale University; 34 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

Classifications MeSH