Prediction of low cardiac output syndrome in patients following cardiac surgery using machine learning.
cardiac surgery
low cardiac output syndrome
machine learning
predictive model
risk stratification
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
19
06
2022
accepted:
08
08
2022
entrez:
12
9
2022
pubmed:
13
9
2022
medline:
13
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) in patients following cardiac surgery using machine learning algorithms. The clinical data of cardiac surgery patients in Nanjing First Hospital between June 2019 and November 2020 were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical records. Six conventional machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting and light gradient boosting machine, were employed to construct the LCOS predictive models with all predictive features (full models) and selected predictive features (reduced models). The discrimination of these models was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the calibration of the models was assessed by the calibration curve. Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) were used to interpret the predictive models. Data from 1,585 patients [982 (62.0%) were male, aged 18 to 88, 212 (13.4%) with LCOS] were employed to train and validate the LCOS models. Among the full models, the RF model (AUC: 0.909, 95% CI: 0.875-0.943; Sensitivity: 0.849, 95% CI: 0.724-0.933; Specificity: 0.835, 95% CI: 0.796-0.869) and the XGB model (AUC: 0.897, 95% CI: 0.859-0.935; Sensitivity: 0.830, 95% CI: 0.702-0.919; Specificity: 0.809, 95% CI: 0.768-0.845) exhibited well predictive power for LCOS. Eleven predictive features including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), first post-operative blood lactate (Lac), left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd), cumulative time of mean artery blood pressure (MABP) lower than 65 mmHg (MABP < 65 time), hypertension history, platelets level (PLT), age, blood creatinine (Cr), total area under curve above threshold central venous pressure (CVP) 12 mmHg and 16 mmHg, and blood loss during operation were used to build the reduced models. Among the reduced models, RF model (AUC: 0.895, 95% CI: 0.857-0.933; Sensitivity: 0.830, 95% CI: 0.702-0.919; Specificity: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.765-0.843) revealed the best performance. SHAP and LIME plot showed that LVEF, Lac, LVDd and MABP < 65 time significantly contributed to the prediction model. In this study, we successfully developed several machine learning models to predict LCOS after surgery, which may avail to risk stratification, early detection and management of LCOS after cardiac surgery.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) in patients following cardiac surgery using machine learning algorithms.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The clinical data of cardiac surgery patients in Nanjing First Hospital between June 2019 and November 2020 were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical records. Six conventional machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting and light gradient boosting machine, were employed to construct the LCOS predictive models with all predictive features (full models) and selected predictive features (reduced models). The discrimination of these models was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the calibration of the models was assessed by the calibration curve. Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) were used to interpret the predictive models.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Data from 1,585 patients [982 (62.0%) were male, aged 18 to 88, 212 (13.4%) with LCOS] were employed to train and validate the LCOS models. Among the full models, the RF model (AUC: 0.909, 95% CI: 0.875-0.943; Sensitivity: 0.849, 95% CI: 0.724-0.933; Specificity: 0.835, 95% CI: 0.796-0.869) and the XGB model (AUC: 0.897, 95% CI: 0.859-0.935; Sensitivity: 0.830, 95% CI: 0.702-0.919; Specificity: 0.809, 95% CI: 0.768-0.845) exhibited well predictive power for LCOS. Eleven predictive features including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), first post-operative blood lactate (Lac), left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd), cumulative time of mean artery blood pressure (MABP) lower than 65 mmHg (MABP < 65 time), hypertension history, platelets level (PLT), age, blood creatinine (Cr), total area under curve above threshold central venous pressure (CVP) 12 mmHg and 16 mmHg, and blood loss during operation were used to build the reduced models. Among the reduced models, RF model (AUC: 0.895, 95% CI: 0.857-0.933; Sensitivity: 0.830, 95% CI: 0.702-0.919; Specificity: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.765-0.843) revealed the best performance. SHAP and LIME plot showed that LVEF, Lac, LVDd and MABP < 65 time significantly contributed to the prediction model.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
In this study, we successfully developed several machine learning models to predict LCOS after surgery, which may avail to risk stratification, early detection and management of LCOS after cardiac surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36091676
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.973147
pmc: PMC9448978
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
973147Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Hong, Xu, Ge, Tao, Shen, Song, Guan and Zhang.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 25;16 Suppl 3:74
pubmed: 27454392
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):291-308
pubmed: 27671216
Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 Jul;3(2):147-58
pubmed: 21234194
Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:57-79
pubmed: 16533109
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 23;10(1):5245
pubmed: 32251324
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Jul;112(1):38-51
pubmed: 8691884
Br J Anaesth. 2022 May;128(5):785-795
pubmed: 35249707
Int Heart J. 2015;56(2):144-9
pubmed: 25740396
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):201
pubmed: 20497611
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):47-65
pubmed: 27792044
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;92(5):1678-84
pubmed: 21939957
J Evid Based Med. 2020 Feb;13(1):57-69
pubmed: 32086994
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Feb 25;14:623-632
pubmed: 33664585
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Jan;34(1):87-96
pubmed: 31515188
Circulation. 2005 Aug 30;112(9 Suppl):I448-52
pubmed: 16159861
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;123(3):489-497
pubmed: 30473325
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;68(5):401-409
pubmed: 31770777
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):87
pubmed: 32093619
J Transl Med. 2020 Dec 7;18(1):462
pubmed: 33287854
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012 Nov;53(5):734-41
pubmed: 23046516
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247
pubmed: 34599691
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11:CD009669
pubmed: 33152122
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 07;6(6):e011031
pubmed: 27267107
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1476-1483
pubmed: 29116972
Crit Care. 2020 Jul 31;24(1):478
pubmed: 32736589
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 May;163(5):1890-1898.e10
pubmed: 32800368
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Aug;27(8):952-960
pubmed: 29555415
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2016;12(2):107-11
pubmed: 26585039
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):UC05-UC08
pubmed: 28208977
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jun;35(6):1638-1645
pubmed: 33419684
Anesth Analg. 2021 Jun 1;132(6):1654-1665
pubmed: 33177322
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Jun;24(3):204-208
pubmed: 29608456
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):652-662
pubmed: 29489489
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Apr;31(2):522-528
pubmed: 27727080
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Jun 27;8:33
pubmed: 26112054
Crit Care. 2015 Jan 14;19:10
pubmed: 25588568