Intralesional collagenase

Peyronie’s disease (PD) acute phase collagenase Clostridium histolyticum

Journal

Translational andrology and urology
ISSN: 2223-4691
Titre abrégé: Transl Androl Urol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101581119

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 14 03 2022
accepted: 26 06 2022
entrez: 12 9 2022
pubmed: 13 9 2022
medline: 13 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Peyronie's disease (PD) can be subdivided into acute and chronic phases. Intralesional collagenase All men receiving intralesional collagenase for PD from October 2015 through December 2020 at a single academic institution were retrospectively assessed for patient demographics and comorbidities, pre- and post-treatment curvature, and adverse events. Two definitions of acute phase were used: (I) acute phase duration ≤6 months, chronic phase duration >6 months; and (II) acute phase duration ≤12 months with penile pain, chronic phase duration >12 or no penile pain. Of 330 patients identified, 229 underwent intralesional collagenase treatment with pre- and post-treatment erect penile goniometry. 65 (28%) met criteria for definition 1 of acute phase, 37 (16%) met criteria for definition 2, and 76 (33%) met criteria for either. Percent change in penile curvature was not significantly different between acute and chronic phases using definition 1 (16.0% This single-center, retrospective cohort analysis suggests that intralesional collagenase is both safe and effective for the treatment of men with acute phase PD. Limitations exist inherent to retrospective review, since many men did not return for post-treatment goniometry, possibly skewing our cohort toward incomplete responders. Prospective, randomized studies will be required to confirm these findings.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Peyronie's disease (PD) can be subdivided into acute and chronic phases. Intralesional collagenase
Methods UNASSIGNED
All men receiving intralesional collagenase for PD from October 2015 through December 2020 at a single academic institution were retrospectively assessed for patient demographics and comorbidities, pre- and post-treatment curvature, and adverse events. Two definitions of acute phase were used: (I) acute phase duration ≤6 months, chronic phase duration >6 months; and (II) acute phase duration ≤12 months with penile pain, chronic phase duration >12 or no penile pain.
Results UNASSIGNED
Of 330 patients identified, 229 underwent intralesional collagenase treatment with pre- and post-treatment erect penile goniometry. 65 (28%) met criteria for definition 1 of acute phase, 37 (16%) met criteria for definition 2, and 76 (33%) met criteria for either. Percent change in penile curvature was not significantly different between acute and chronic phases using definition 1 (16.0%
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
This single-center, retrospective cohort analysis suggests that intralesional collagenase is both safe and effective for the treatment of men with acute phase PD. Limitations exist inherent to retrospective review, since many men did not return for post-treatment goniometry, possibly skewing our cohort toward incomplete responders. Prospective, randomized studies will be required to confirm these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36092841
doi: 10.21037/tau-22-188
pii: tau-11-08-1074
pmc: PMC9459553
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1074-1082

Informations de copyright

2022 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-22-188/coif). JNM is a consultant for Endo Pharmaceuticals, Incorporation, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Antares Pharma, Incorporation. AJS has received an investigator-initiated Publication Logistical Support Grant from Endo Pharmaceuticals, Incorporation. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

J Sex Med. 2011 Dec;8(12):3446-51
pubmed: 21981553
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Mar 02;11:431-448
pubmed: 28280315
Urology. 2017 Feb;100:125-130
pubmed: 27816605
J Sex Med. 2008 Sep;5(9):2179-84
pubmed: 18638001
Andrology. 2017 Jul;5(4):771-775
pubmed: 28718527
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):259-62
pubmed: 15201789
J Sex Med. 2011 Feb;8(2):518-23
pubmed: 20955309
World J Mens Health. 2021 Jul;39(3):399-405
pubmed: 32648381
J Androl. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):502-8
pubmed: 21233397
Andrology. 2022 Jan;10(1):42-50
pubmed: 34297894
J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):745-53
pubmed: 26066402
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Aug;7(4):603-617
pubmed: 30211050
Sex Med Rev. 2019 Apr;7(2):329-337
pubmed: 30503796
J Urol. 1993 Jan;149(1):56-8
pubmed: 8417217
J Urol. 2013 Jul;190(1):199-207
pubmed: 23376148
Adv Urol. 2011;2011:282503
pubmed: 22110491
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 23;11(2):e0150157
pubmed: 26907743
Urology. 2016 Aug;94:143-7
pubmed: 27211926
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Feb;10(2):555-562
pubmed: 33718058
Sex Med Rev. 2021 Apr;9(2):340-349
pubmed: 32199788
J Urol. 2012 Jun;187(6):2268-74
pubmed: 22503048
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):269-277
pubmed: 31168744
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):627-34
pubmed: 23376705
J Urol. 1990 Dec;144(6):1376-9
pubmed: 2231932
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):299-304
pubmed: 31093703
J Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2115-8; discussion 2118
pubmed: 16697815
J Sex Med. 2008 Aug;5(8):1985-90
pubmed: 18554257
Transl Androl Urol. 2013 Mar;2(1):39-44
pubmed: 26816722
World J Mens Health. 2021 Apr;39(2):352-357
pubmed: 32009312
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):293-298
pubmed: 31152197
J Sex Med. 2017 Oct;14(10):1220-1225
pubmed: 28874331
Res Rep Urol. 2016 Apr 29;8:61-70
pubmed: 27200305
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Dec;10(12):4313-4319
pubmed: 35070813
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):650-6
pubmed: 25711400
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Mar;9(Suppl 2):S269-S283
pubmed: 32257868
Urology. 2020 Nov;145:147-151
pubmed: 32777367

Auteurs

Ming-Yeah Y Hu (MY)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

John T Sigalos (JT)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Dyvon T Walker (DT)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Michelle K Li (MK)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Dar A Yoffe (DA)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Neilufar Modiri (N)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Thomas W Gaither (TW)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Alvaro J Santamaria (AJ)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Keith V Regets (KV)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Sriram V Eleswarapu (SV)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Jesse N Mills (JN)

Division of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH