Home-Based Electronic Cognitive Therapy in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Alzheimer disease dementia cognitive training technology

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 23 10 2021
accepted: 11 07 2022
revised: 30 06 2022
entrez: 12 9 2022
pubmed: 13 9 2022
medline: 13 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Can home-based computerized cognitive training programs be a useful tool to sustain cognition and quality of life in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD)? To date, the progressive nature of the disease has made this question difficult to answer. Computerized platforms provide more accessibility to cognitive trainings; however, the feasibility of long-term, home-based computerized programs for patients with AD dementia remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a 24-week home-based intervention program using the Constant Therapy app and its preliminary efficacy on cognition in patients with AD. Constant Therapy is a program developed for patients with speech and cognitive deficits. We hypothesized that patients with AD would use Constant Therapy daily over the course of the 24-week period. Data were collected over a 48-week period. We recruited participants aged between 50 and 90 years with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to AD or mild AD dementia. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Constant Therapy (n=10) or active control (n=9) group. The Constant Therapy group completed a tablet-based training during the first 24 weeks; the second 24 weeks of computerized training were optional. The active control group completed paper-and-pencil games during the first 24 weeks and were invited to complete an optional Constant Therapy training during the second 24 weeks. Every 6 weeks, the participants completed the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The participants independently accessed Constant Therapy using an Apple iPad. Our primary feasibility outcomes were the rate of adherence and daily use of Constant Therapy over 24 weeks. Our secondary outcomes were Constant Therapy performance over 24 weeks and change in RBANS scores between the 2 experimental groups. Feasibility analyses were computed for participants who completed 24 weeks of Constant Therapy. We found that long-term use of the Constant Therapy program was feasible in patients with AD over 24 weeks (adherence 80%; program use 121/168 days, for 32 minutes daily). These participants showed an overall improvement in accuracy and latency (P=.005) in the Constant Therapy scores, as well as specific improvements in visual and auditory memory, attention, and arithmetic tasks. The Constant Therapy group showed improvement in the RBANS coding subtest. No unexpected problems or adverse events were observed. Long-term (eg, 24 weeks) computerized cognitive training using Constant Therapy is feasible in patients with AD in the mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia stages. Patients adhered more to Constant Therapy than to the paper-and-pencil training over 24 weeks and improved their performance over time. These findings support the development of future randomized controlled trials that will investigate the efficacy of Constant Therapy to sustain cognitive function in patients with AD. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02521558; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02521558.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Can home-based computerized cognitive training programs be a useful tool to sustain cognition and quality of life in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD)? To date, the progressive nature of the disease has made this question difficult to answer. Computerized platforms provide more accessibility to cognitive trainings; however, the feasibility of long-term, home-based computerized programs for patients with AD dementia remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a 24-week home-based intervention program using the Constant Therapy app and its preliminary efficacy on cognition in patients with AD. Constant Therapy is a program developed for patients with speech and cognitive deficits. We hypothesized that patients with AD would use Constant Therapy daily over the course of the 24-week period.
METHODS METHODS
Data were collected over a 48-week period. We recruited participants aged between 50 and 90 years with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to AD or mild AD dementia. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Constant Therapy (n=10) or active control (n=9) group. The Constant Therapy group completed a tablet-based training during the first 24 weeks; the second 24 weeks of computerized training were optional. The active control group completed paper-and-pencil games during the first 24 weeks and were invited to complete an optional Constant Therapy training during the second 24 weeks. Every 6 weeks, the participants completed the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The participants independently accessed Constant Therapy using an Apple iPad. Our primary feasibility outcomes were the rate of adherence and daily use of Constant Therapy over 24 weeks. Our secondary outcomes were Constant Therapy performance over 24 weeks and change in RBANS scores between the 2 experimental groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
Feasibility analyses were computed for participants who completed 24 weeks of Constant Therapy. We found that long-term use of the Constant Therapy program was feasible in patients with AD over 24 weeks (adherence 80%; program use 121/168 days, for 32 minutes daily). These participants showed an overall improvement in accuracy and latency (P=.005) in the Constant Therapy scores, as well as specific improvements in visual and auditory memory, attention, and arithmetic tasks. The Constant Therapy group showed improvement in the RBANS coding subtest. No unexpected problems or adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Long-term (eg, 24 weeks) computerized cognitive training using Constant Therapy is feasible in patients with AD in the mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia stages. Patients adhered more to Constant Therapy than to the paper-and-pencil training over 24 weeks and improved their performance over time. These findings support the development of future randomized controlled trials that will investigate the efficacy of Constant Therapy to sustain cognitive function in patients with AD.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02521558; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02521558.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36094804
pii: v6i9e34450
doi: 10.2196/34450
pmc: PMC9513684
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02521558']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e34450

Informations de copyright

©Anna Marin, Renée DeCaro, Kylie Schiloski, Ala’a Elshaar, Brigid Dwyer, Ana Vives-Rodriguez, Rocco Palumbo, Katherine Turk, Andrew Budson. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 12.09.2022.

Références

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Jul;26(6):545-556
pubmed: 32106906
J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 07;16(5):e122
pubmed: 24808451
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 20;7:292
pubmed: 23801955
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;174(4):329-340
pubmed: 27838936
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 05;8:1015
pubmed: 25601831
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2007 Jul-Sep;29(3 Suppl B):B26-32
pubmed: 18575355
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;22(4):356-60
pubmed: 17117398
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jan;62(1):16-24
pubmed: 24417410
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2015 Aug;30(5):448-57
pubmed: 26025231
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):205-10
pubmed: 19812460
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 7;22(2):e16286
pubmed: 32044752
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018 Mar 14;15(5):452-461
pubmed: 29141548
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Nov;3(11):907-915
pubmed: 30197048
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;18(1):50-4
pubmed: 15084794
Neurol Clin. 2007 Aug;25(3):577-609, v
pubmed: 17659182
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1871-81
pubmed: 22525705
Psychosom Med. 2002 May-Jun;64(3):510-9
pubmed: 12021425
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 12;12:626780
pubmed: 33643204
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22(4):339-45
pubmed: 16954689
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9
pubmed: 21514249
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0130831
pubmed: 26098943
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 05;(6):CD003260
pubmed: 23740535
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Sep;29(9):1473-1482
pubmed: 27897677
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021 May 10;13(1):98
pubmed: 33971962
JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2805-14
pubmed: 17179457
Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55
pubmed: 7203086
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239
pubmed: 27777223
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Jan;57(1):P19-27
pubmed: 11773220
Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 25;10:140
pubmed: 30858819
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Dec;15(12):873-80
pubmed: 25444575
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 16;11:262
pubmed: 28559806
Int Psychogeriatr. 2008 Feb;20(1):57-66
pubmed: 17958927
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219541
pubmed: 31291337
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014 Jun;28(3):197-9
pubmed: 24856273
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Jun 19;6:88
pubmed: 32577299
Semin Speech Lang. 2014 Feb;35(1):38-50
pubmed: 24449464
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242233
pubmed: 33253192
Neural Plast. 2018 Jul 11;2018:2845176
pubmed: 30123243
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 25;11:557571
pubmed: 33329097
J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1988;21(1):73-88
pubmed: 3171111
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):31
pubmed: 29378515
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 Jul-Aug;57(1):1-7
pubmed: 23542053
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40588
pubmed: 22792378
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;23(4):335-359
pubmed: 24998488
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Dec;17(12):1966-1975
pubmed: 34043283
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jan-Feb;54(1):181-4
pubmed: 21458869

Auteurs

Anna Marin (A)

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Renée DeCaro (R)

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Kylie Schiloski (K)

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.

Ala'a Elshaar (A)

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.

Brigid Dwyer (B)

Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Ana Vives-Rodriguez (A)

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.

Rocco Palumbo (R)

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.

Katherine Turk (K)

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Andrew Budson (A)

Center for Translational Cognitive Neuroscience, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Classifications MeSH