Does gender influence outcome measures similarly in patients with spondyloarthritis? Results from the ASAS-perSpA study.
arthritis, psoriatic
patient reported outcome measures
spondylitis, ankylosing
Journal
RMD open
ISSN: 2056-5933
Titre abrégé: RMD Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101662038
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
16
06
2022
accepted:
15
08
2022
entrez:
12
9
2022
pubmed:
13
9
2022
medline:
15
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the influence of gender on disease outcomes in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), including across SpA subtypes. Data from 4185 patients of 23 countries with a diagnosis of axial SpA (axSpA), peripheral SpA (pSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-perSpA study were analysed. Associations between gender and disease activity (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (BASDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP)), function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)) and overall health (ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI), European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D)) outcomes were investigated. Multilevel multivariable linear mixed models adjusted for relevant confounders (and stratified by disease subtype in case of a relevant interaction) were used. In total, 65%, 10% and 25% of patients had axSpA, pSpA and PsA, respectively. axSpA was more frequent in males (68%), whereas pSpA and PsA were more frequent in females (53% and 52%, respectively). A significant interaction between gender and disease subtype was found for ASDAS, BASDAI and BASFI. While being female independently contributed to higher BASDAI across the three disease subtypes (with varying magnitude), female gender was only associated with higher ASDAS in pSpA (β (95% CI): 0.36 (0.15 to 0.58)) and PsA (0.25 (0.12 to 0.38)) but not in axSpA (0.016 (-0.07 to 0.11)). No associations were observed between gender and CRP levels. Female gender was associated with higher ASAS HI and EQ-5D, without differences across disease subtype. Female gender is associated with less favourable outcome measures across the SpA spectrum. However, while female gender influences BASDAI across the three subtypes, ASDAS is associated with gender only in pSpA and PsA but not in axSpA. Therefore, ASDAS is an appropriate instrument both for females and males with axSpA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36096523
pii: rmdopen-2022-002514
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002514
pmc: PMC9472201
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: DB: speakers bureau: Janssen. Grant/Research support from: Novartis. DC: speakers bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer. Grant/Research support from: Pfizer. SR: speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Sanofi. Grant/Research support from: AbbVie, Galapagos, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, UCB. AM: consultant of: AbbVie, UCB, Novartis, Gilead, Pfizer, Lilly and Janssen. Grant/Research support from: UCB. CL-M: speakers bureau: Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, UCB and AbbVie. MD: none declared. VN-C: speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Galapagos, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. Grant/Research support from: Novartis.
Références
Rheumatol Int. 2019 Jan;39(1):141-146
pubmed: 30413924
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 May;74(5):830-5
pubmed: 24399232
J Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;49(6):577-584
pubmed: 35232810
J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281-5
pubmed: 7699629
J Rheumatol. 2022 Mar;49(3):239-241
pubmed: 34725183
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(21):1765-73
pubmed: 22394105
J Rheumatol. 2021 Oct;48(10):1528-1536
pubmed: 33858974
RMD Open. 2021 Dec;7(3):
pubmed: 34876490
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 May 12;20(6):35
pubmed: 29754330
Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:482691
pubmed: 23690822
J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91
pubmed: 7699630
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Mar;55(3):419-28
pubmed: 26385369
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Feb 25;2018:6358624
pubmed: 29682130
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Aug;50(4):687-694
pubmed: 32521322
J Pain. 2012 Mar;13(3):228-34
pubmed: 22245360
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Oct 1;20(1):218
pubmed: 30285842
J Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;44(2):174-183
pubmed: 27980009
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;40(7):2753-2761
pubmed: 33464431
Joint Bone Spine. 2020 Jul;87(4):315-319
pubmed: 32109577
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 22;8:711875
pubmed: 34631733
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Jun 28;:
pubmed: 35763155
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Apr;41(4):1115-1124
pubmed: 34988682
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021 Sep 20;13:1759720X211045263
pubmed: 34567275
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Dec;80(12):1511-1521
pubmed: 34615639
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Aug;52(8):1492-9
pubmed: 23650623
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jun 15;51(3):311-5
pubmed: 15188312
Pain. 2012 Mar;153(3):602-618
pubmed: 22192712
Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;34(3):515-21
pubmed: 24985042
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1973;3(1):55-78
pubmed: 4581554
J Pain. 2011 Apr;12(4):468-75
pubmed: 21296030
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Apr;72(4):578-82
pubmed: 22589379
Scand J Rheumatol. 2022 Jan 20;:1-8
pubmed: 35048786
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977 Nov;16(4):257-9
pubmed: 414343
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Sep;65(9):1482-9
pubmed: 23463610
Pain. 2021 Apr 1;162(4):1188-1200
pubmed: 33044396
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1811-8
pubmed: 19060001
J Rheumatol. 2022 Mar;49(3):256-264
pubmed: 34470791
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1302-7
pubmed: 26245756
Mod Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;27(2):345-349
pubmed: 27415964
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
RMD Open. 2021 Jan;7(1):
pubmed: 33462157