Combined alteration of lamin and nuclear morphology influences the localization of the tumor-associated factor AKTIP.
Lamins
Nuclear morphology
Progeria mutations
Protein mislocalization
Risk biomarker
Tumor cells
Journal
Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR
ISSN: 1756-9966
Titre abrégé: J Exp Clin Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8308647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Sep 2022
13 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
06
06
2022
accepted:
30
08
2022
entrez:
12
9
2022
pubmed:
13
9
2022
medline:
15
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lamins, key nuclear lamina components, have been proposed as candidate risk biomarkers in different types of cancer but their accuracy is still debated. AKTIP is a telomeric protein with the property of being enriched at the nuclear lamina. AKTIP has similarity with the tumor susceptibility gene TSG101. AKTIP deficiency generates genome instability and, in p53 We performed super-resolution imaging, quantification of lamin expression and nuclear morphology on HeLa, MCF7, and A549 tumor cells, and on non-transformed fibroblasts from healthy donor and HGPS (LMNA c.1824C > T p.Gly608Gly) and EDMD2 (LMNA c.775 T > G) patients. As proof of principle model combining a defined lamin alteration with a tumor cell setting, we produced HeLa cells exogenously expressing the HGPS lamin mutant progerin that alters nuclear morphology. In HeLa cells, AKTIP locates at less than 0.5 µm from the nuclear rim and co-localizes with lamin A/C. As compared to HeLa, there is a reduced co-localization of AKTIP with lamin A/C in both MCF7 and A549. Additionally, MCF7 display lower amounts of AKTIP at the rim. The analyses in non-transformed fibroblasts show that AKTIP mislocalizes in HGPS cells but not in EDMD2. The integrated analysis of lamin expression, nuclear morphology, and AKTIP topology shows that positioning of AKTIP is influenced not only by lamin expression, but also by nuclear morphology. This conclusion is validated by progerin-expressing HeLa cells in which nuclei are morphologically altered and AKTIP is mislocalized. Our data show that the combined alteration of lamin and nuclear morphology influences the localization of the tumor-associated factor AKTIP. The results also point to the fact that lamin alterations per se are not predictive of AKTIP mislocalization, in both non-transformed and tumor cells. In more general terms, this study supports the thesis that a combined analytical approach should be preferred to predict lamin-associated changes in tumor cells. This paves the way of next translational evaluation to validate the use of this combined analytical approach as risk biomarker.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lamins, key nuclear lamina components, have been proposed as candidate risk biomarkers in different types of cancer but their accuracy is still debated. AKTIP is a telomeric protein with the property of being enriched at the nuclear lamina. AKTIP has similarity with the tumor susceptibility gene TSG101. AKTIP deficiency generates genome instability and, in p53
METHODS
METHODS
We performed super-resolution imaging, quantification of lamin expression and nuclear morphology on HeLa, MCF7, and A549 tumor cells, and on non-transformed fibroblasts from healthy donor and HGPS (LMNA c.1824C > T p.Gly608Gly) and EDMD2 (LMNA c.775 T > G) patients. As proof of principle model combining a defined lamin alteration with a tumor cell setting, we produced HeLa cells exogenously expressing the HGPS lamin mutant progerin that alters nuclear morphology.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In HeLa cells, AKTIP locates at less than 0.5 µm from the nuclear rim and co-localizes with lamin A/C. As compared to HeLa, there is a reduced co-localization of AKTIP with lamin A/C in both MCF7 and A549. Additionally, MCF7 display lower amounts of AKTIP at the rim. The analyses in non-transformed fibroblasts show that AKTIP mislocalizes in HGPS cells but not in EDMD2. The integrated analysis of lamin expression, nuclear morphology, and AKTIP topology shows that positioning of AKTIP is influenced not only by lamin expression, but also by nuclear morphology. This conclusion is validated by progerin-expressing HeLa cells in which nuclei are morphologically altered and AKTIP is mislocalized.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our data show that the combined alteration of lamin and nuclear morphology influences the localization of the tumor-associated factor AKTIP. The results also point to the fact that lamin alterations per se are not predictive of AKTIP mislocalization, in both non-transformed and tumor cells. In more general terms, this study supports the thesis that a combined analytical approach should be preferred to predict lamin-associated changes in tumor cells. This paves the way of next translational evaluation to validate the use of this combined analytical approach as risk biomarker.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36096808
doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02480-5
pii: 10.1186/s13046-022-02480-5
pmc: PMC9469526
doi:
Substances chimiques
AKTIP protein, human
0
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
0
Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins
0
Fts protein, mouse
0
Lamin Type A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
273Subventions
Organisme : Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
ID : IG-24614
Organisme : Progeria Research Foundation
ID : 2016-67
Organisme : Sapienza Università di Roma
ID : RP1181642E87148C
Organisme : Sapienza Università di Roma
ID : RP11916B7F20A9E3
Organisme : Sapienza Università di Roma
ID : AR2201729E35E733
Organisme : Sapienza Università di Roma
ID : AR22117A575BCFA5
Organisme : Sapienza Università di Roma
ID : Be For Erc 145
Organisme : Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
ID : 22392
Organisme : EMBO
ID : ST fellowship 7621
Organisme : Fondazione Umberto Veronesi
ID : TG 2019
Organisme : Fondazione Buzzati Traverso
ID : 813
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Curr Biol. 2003 Sep 2;13(17):1549-56
pubmed: 12956959
Methods Appl Fluoresc. 2015 Jan 16;3(1):014002
pubmed: 29148478
EMBO J. 2007 Oct 3;26(19):4215-27
pubmed: 17853893
J Cell Biol. 2013 Sep 30;202(7):1023-39
pubmed: 24062341
Pathol Res Pract. 2015 Feb;211(2):175-82
pubmed: 25499720
Trends Genet. 2012 Sep;28(9):464-71
pubmed: 22795640
Neoplasia. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):1-6
pubmed: 15068665
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5254-9
pubmed: 24706872
Virchows Arch. 2019 Oct;475(4):407-414
pubmed: 31201505
Science. 2016 Apr 15;352(6283):353-8
pubmed: 27013428
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e2988
pubmed: 18714339
Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1367-76
pubmed: 23622360
J Cell Biol. 2018 Jan 2;217(1):21-37
pubmed: 29051264
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019 Jun;76(11):2199-2216
pubmed: 30762072
Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):293-8
pubmed: 12714972
Nano Lett. 2022 Aug 15;:
pubmed: 35969027
Nucleus. 2012 Sep-Oct;3(5):452-62
pubmed: 22895092
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29230
pubmed: 22242161
Cancer Med. 2015 Oct;4(10):1547-57
pubmed: 26175118
Nucleus. 2014 Sep-Oct;5(5):427-40
pubmed: 25482195
Front Genet. 2018 Nov 27;9:581
pubmed: 30546381
Nature. 2017 Mar 9;543(7644):261-264
pubmed: 28241138
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2016 Jul 1;33(7):B12-20
pubmed: 27409703
Biophys J. 2008 Jul;95(2):877-85
pubmed: 18375513
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2014;109:249-85
pubmed: 24947239
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 6;102(36):12873-8
pubmed: 16129834
Dev Cell. 2019 Jun 17;49(6):920-935.e5
pubmed: 31105008
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Cell Death Dis. 2019 Nov 7;10(11):850
pubmed: 31699974
Nat Mater. 2020 Apr;19(4):464-473
pubmed: 31844279
Cells. 2019 Apr 18;8(4):
pubmed: 31003483
Aging Cell. 2018 Aug;17(4):e12730
pubmed: 29635765
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133607
pubmed: 26207738
Trends Cancer. 2018 Apr;4(4):320-331
pubmed: 29606315
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 20;7(1):17946
pubmed: 29263424
Carcinogenesis. 2012 Apr;33(4):751-9
pubmed: 22301279
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 15;101(24):8963-8
pubmed: 15184648
Nat Cell Biol. 2009 Oct;11(10):1261-7
pubmed: 19734887
Ageing Res Rev. 2017 Jan;33:18-29
pubmed: 27374873
Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):1059-63
pubmed: 16645051
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018 Feb;74:50-65
pubmed: 28843980
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Apr;126(2):345-54
pubmed: 20446030
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 6;9(1):3613
pubmed: 30190500
Science. 2003 Sep 5;301(5638):1380-2
pubmed: 12958361
Cells. 2021 Jan 14;10(1):
pubmed: 33466669
Cell Cycle. 2010 Jul 1;9(13):2600-10
pubmed: 20581439
PLoS Genet. 2021 Aug 27;17(8):e1009757
pubmed: 34449766
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Jun;30(6):1030-43
pubmed: 25487351
Mol Biol Cell. 2014 May;25(9):1493-510
pubmed: 24623722
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 09;12(12):
pubmed: 33316938
Genes Dev. 2018 Oct 1;32(19-20):1321-1331
pubmed: 30228202
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45513
pubmed: 23049808
Biochem Soc Trans. 2011 Dec;39(6):1710-4
pubmed: 22103512
Cells. 2019 Mar 11;8(3):
pubmed: 30862117
Curr Biol. 2016 Oct 10;26(19):2651-2658
pubmed: 27641764
Appl Opt. 2006 Jul 10;45(20):5037-45
pubmed: 16807615
Chin J Cancer. 2011 Jun;30(6):415-25
pubmed: 21627864
Science. 2008 Jun 6;320(5881):1332-6
pubmed: 18535242
Cell. 2016 Jun 2;165(6):1361-1374
pubmed: 27259148
Open Biol. 2016 Aug;6(8):
pubmed: 27512140
Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 Jun;78(6):372-84
pubmed: 16830199
Nucleus. 2020 Dec;11(1):205-218
pubmed: 32835589
Mech Ageing Dev. 2009 Jun;130(6):377-83
pubmed: 19428457
Chemphyschem. 2014 Mar 17;15(4):794-800
pubmed: 24436314
Nucleus. 2018 Dec 31;9(1):368-379
pubmed: 29936894
Science. 2007 Nov 30;318(5855):1408-12
pubmed: 18048680
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2013 Dec;18(4):595-611
pubmed: 24293108
PLoS Genet. 2015 Jun 25;11(6):e1005167
pubmed: 26110528
Nat Genet. 1999 Mar;21(3):285-8
pubmed: 10080180
Nucleus. 2010 Nov-Dec;1(6):513-25
pubmed: 21327095
J Cell Biol. 2010 Jul 26;190(2):165-75
pubmed: 20643879
Chromosoma. 2017 Aug;126(4):501-517
pubmed: 27534416
Genes Dev. 2008 Apr 1;22(7):832-53
pubmed: 18381888
Trends Cell Biol. 2018 Jan;28(1):34-45
pubmed: 28893461