Lessons Learned from the Covid-19 Crisis: Recommendations for Action to Optimize Occupational Health in Mental Health Professionals in Europe.
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
burnout
epidemic
ethics
health crisis
information
mental health
occupational health
pandemic
prevention
professional practices
psychiatry
telepsychiatry
training
Journal
Clinical neuropsychiatry
ISSN: 2385-0787
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuropsychiatry
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101237961
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
entrez:
14
9
2022
pubmed:
15
9
2022
medline:
15
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Covid-19 health crisis has disrupted the organization and functioning of European mental health and psychiatric services, impacting the working conditions - already difficult before the epidemic - of professionals working therein. The Psy-GIPO2C project investigated the impact of the pandemic on these professionals. The Psy-GIPOC2C project has been co-funded by the This research took the form of a collaborative mixed methods study. The data collected through qualitative and quantitative research were analyzed during a working session held by the research consortium, which resulted in the formulation of recommendations for action to optimize the occupational health of European mental health professionals. This research made it possible to identify and explain the extent to which, and the ways in which, the reorganization of European mental health services has impacted the mental health of the professionals working therein, and, in particular, to highlight the fact that the unprecedented use of digital devices has generated stress, and even tension, within these services. It is important to promote well-being at work among European mental health professionals, by involving them in the development of
Identifiants
pubmed: 36101649
doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220404
pmc: PMC9442858
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
220-229Informations de copyright
© 2022 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None.
Références
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 18;12:701127
pubmed: 34867507
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;18(15):
pubmed: 34360334
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 12;18(7):e193
pubmed: 27405323
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3S):S73-S80
pubmed: 32370984
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Jun;26(5):303-308
pubmed: 30602352
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Nov;293:113441
pubmed: 32898840
Psychol Health Med. 2021 Jan;26(1):23-34
pubmed: 32286091
Soins Psychiatr. 2003 Jan-Feb;(224):5-7
pubmed: 12655930
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Jul 23;94:
pubmed: 32699204
Psychiatr Hung. 2008;23(6):396-419
pubmed: 19218623
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(6):569-92
pubmed: 26540642
Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41
pubmed: 20171303
Psychosomatics. 2020 Nov - Dec;61(6):607-615
pubmed: 32943211
Psychiatr Q. 2017 Jun;88(2):271-283
pubmed: 27796920
J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci. 2016 Mar-Jun;27(1-2):41-57, 227
pubmed: 27305792
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Feb 4;9(1):e30359
pubmed: 34736224
Sante Publique. 2012 Jan-Feb;24(1):23-38
pubmed: 22730607
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Aug 28;7(8):e21108
pubmed: 32658857
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 28;16(12):e0261818
pubmed: 34962945
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Sep;34(3):553-560
pubmed: 33004166
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;45(10):805-7
pubmed: 21980929
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Oct 8;22(12):66
pubmed: 33030637