Varroa destructor resistance to tau-fluvalinate: relationship between in vitro phenotypic test and VGSC L925V mutation.


Journal

Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
revised: 03 08 2022
received: 31 03 2022
accepted: 13 08 2022
pubmed: 15 9 2022
medline: 4 11 2022
entrez: 14 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Varroa destructor is a parasitic mite of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Its presence in colonies can lead to a collapse within a few years. The use of acaricides has become essential to manage the hive infestation. However, the repeated and possibly incorrect use of acaricide treatments, as tau-fluvalinate, has led to the development of resistance. The in vitro phenotypic test allows the proportion of susceptible or resistant individuals to be known following an exposure to an active substance. In Varroa mites, resistance to tau-fluvalinate is associated with the presence of mutations at the position 925 of the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC). Here, we compared the results obtained with an in vitro phenotypic test against tau-fluvalinate and those obtained with an allelic discrimination assay on 13 treated and untreated Varroa populations in France. The correlation between the phenotype and the genetic profile rate is found to be 0.89 Varroa mites having resistant phenotypic profile have a probability of 63% to present the L925V mutation (resistance detection reliability). However, 97% of the Varroa mites having the susceptible phenotype do not present the L925V mutation (susceptible detection reliability). The L925V mutation explains most of the resistance to tau-fluvalinate in V. destructor in the populations tested. However, other mutations or types of resistance may also be involved to explain the survival of Varroa mites in the phenotypic test. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Varroa destructor is a parasitic mite of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Its presence in colonies can lead to a collapse within a few years. The use of acaricides has become essential to manage the hive infestation. However, the repeated and possibly incorrect use of acaricide treatments, as tau-fluvalinate, has led to the development of resistance. The in vitro phenotypic test allows the proportion of susceptible or resistant individuals to be known following an exposure to an active substance. In Varroa mites, resistance to tau-fluvalinate is associated with the presence of mutations at the position 925 of the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC).
RESULTS RESULTS
Here, we compared the results obtained with an in vitro phenotypic test against tau-fluvalinate and those obtained with an allelic discrimination assay on 13 treated and untreated Varroa populations in France. The correlation between the phenotype and the genetic profile rate is found to be 0.89 Varroa mites having resistant phenotypic profile have a probability of 63% to present the L925V mutation (resistance detection reliability). However, 97% of the Varroa mites having the susceptible phenotype do not present the L925V mutation (susceptible detection reliability).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The L925V mutation explains most of the resistance to tau-fluvalinate in V. destructor in the populations tested. However, other mutations or types of resistance may also be involved to explain the survival of Varroa mites in the phenotypic test. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36103265
doi: 10.1002/ps.7126
pmc: PMC9826128
doi:

Substances chimiques

fluvalinate 364G5G03VC
Acaricides 0
Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5097-5105

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Références

Exp Appl Acarol. 2014 Apr;62(4):499-510
pubmed: 24233156
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jun 29;10(1):318
pubmed: 28662724
Insects. 2021 Aug 14;12(8):
pubmed: 34442297
Exp Appl Acarol. 2020 Sep;82(1):1-16
pubmed: 32809187
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2014 Jul;50:1-17
pubmed: 24704279
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 21;14(6):e0218392
pubmed: 31226130
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 29;116(5):1792-1801
pubmed: 30647116
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2013 Jul 1;106(3):93-100
pubmed: 24019556
Methods Enzymol. 2005;401:226-41
pubmed: 16399389
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Jul;77(7):3241-3249
pubmed: 33728766
Insect Mol Biol. 2007 Jun;16(3):361-75
pubmed: 17433068
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11091
pubmed: 28894186
Parasit Vectors. 2010 Aug 04;3:67
pubmed: 20684757
Pest Manag Sci. 2019 May;75(5):1287-1294
pubmed: 30338625
Exp Appl Acarol. 2000 Jan;24(1):35-43
pubmed: 10823355
J Econ Entomol. 2001 Aug;94(4):806-10
pubmed: 11561836
Exp Appl Acarol. 2000 Mar;24(3):165-89
pubmed: 11108385
Parasitology. 2019 Sep;146(11):1429-1439
pubmed: 31362795
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155332
pubmed: 27191597
J Invertebr Pathol. 2010 Jan;103 Suppl 1:S96-119
pubmed: 19909970
Exp Appl Acarol. 2021 Jun;84(2):433-444
pubmed: 33983538
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004 Jul;34(7):653-65
pubmed: 15242706
Commun Biol. 2019 Oct 1;2:357
pubmed: 31583288
Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:371-91
pubmed: 10761582
Exp Appl Acarol. 2021 Dec;85(2-4):205-221
pubmed: 34676469
Parasitol Res. 2015 Nov;114(11):3999-4004
pubmed: 26210302
PLoS Pathog. 2014 Aug 21;10(8):e1004323
pubmed: 25144447
Pathogens. 2021 May 30;10(6):
pubmed: 34070934
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e82941
pubmed: 24367572
Exp Appl Acarol. 2019 Feb;77(2):161-171
pubmed: 30810851
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 16;113(33):9268-73
pubmed: 27439866

Auteurs

Gabrielle Almecija (G)

Apinov, Scientific Beekeeping and Training Centre, Lagord, France.

Marion Schimmerling (M)

French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES), Sophia Antipolis Laboratory, Bee Pathology Unit, Sophia Antipolis, France.

Aurélie Del Cont (A)

French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES), Sophia Antipolis Laboratory, Bee Pathology Unit, Sophia Antipolis, France.

Benjamin Poirot (B)

Apinov, Scientific Beekeeping and Training Centre, Lagord, France.

Véronique Duquesne (V)

French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES), Sophia Antipolis Laboratory, Bee Pathology Unit, Sophia Antipolis, France.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH