Optimization of Patient Positioning for the Sonographic Evaluation of Gallstone Impaction: Analysis of Gallbladder Orientation Based on Computed Tomography.
Journal
Ultrasound quarterly
ISSN: 1536-0253
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Q
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8809459
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2022
01 Dec 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
15
9
2022
medline:
1
12
2022
entrez:
14
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An important sonographic sign of cholecystitis is stone impaction in the gallbladder neck. Demonstration of stone mobility excludes impaction. The purpose of this study is to analyze the orientation of the gallbladder on computed tomography and determine the patient position most likely to facilitate stone mobility. ImageJ processing software was used to determine the x (transverse), y (anterior-posterior), and z (craniocaudal) coordinates for the gallbladder neck and fundus in 544 consecutive computed tomography examinations. The differences in the fundal and neck coordinates were used to determine the likelihood of moving a stone from the neck to the fundus for the left and right lateral decubitus positions ( x coordinates), the prone position ( y coordinates), and the upright position ( z coordinates). The coordinate with the largest difference was considered to predict the position most likely to facilitate stone motion. The difference in position of the fundus and neck was greatest in the y -, z -, and x -axis in 232 (42.6%), 194 (35.7%), and 118 (21.7%) of patients, respectively. For body mass index (BMI) less than 25 kg/m 2 , the difference was greatest in the z -axis (59.8%). For BMI greater than 25 kg/m 2 , the difference was greatest in the y -axis (47.1%). Based on their relative location, the optimal position to facilitate gallstone mobility from the gallbladder neck to fundus was most often prone (especially in high BMI patients), followed by upright (especially in low BMI patients), followed by right lateral decubitus. The left lateral decubitus position was never optimal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36103429
doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000620
pii: 00013644-202212000-00012
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
341-345Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Wise PE, Holzman MD. Surgical anatomy of the gallbladder, liver, and biliary tree. In: MacFadyen BV, Arregui ME, Eubanks S, et al, eds. Laparoscopic Surgery of the Abdomen . New York, NY: Springer New York; 2004:73–86.
Murphy MC, Gibney B, Gillespie C, et al. Gallstones top to toe: what the radiologist needs to know. Insights Imaging . 2020;11:13.
Bennett GL. Chapter 79—cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, and hyperplastic cholecystoses. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, eds. Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology (Third Edition) . Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2008:1411–1456.
Smereczyński A, Kołaczyk K, Bernatowicz E. Optimization of diagnostic ultrasonography of the gallbladder based on own experience and literature. J Ultrason . 2020;20:e29–e35.
Hertzberg BS, Middleton WD. Gallbladder. In: Ultrasound: The Requisites . New York: Elsevier; 2016.
Bortoff GA, Chen MY, Ott DJ, et al. Gallbladder stones: imaging and intervention. Radiographics . 2000;20:751–766.
Bennett GL, Balthazar EJ. Ultrasound and CT evaluation of emergent gallbladder pathology. Radiol Clin North Am . 2003;41:1203–1216.
Hough DM, Glazebrook KN, Paulson EK, et al. Value of prone positioning in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of gallstones: prospective study. J Ultrasound Med . 2000;19:633–638.
ACR. ACR-AIUM-SPR-SRU practice parameter for the performance of an ultrasound examination of the abdomen and/or retroperitoneum. In: ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards . ACR.org; 2017.