Association between chronic low back pain and regular exercise, sedentary behaviour and mental health before and during COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a large-scale cross-sectional study in Germany.
COVID-19
Exercise
Germany
Graded chronic pain scale
Health
Humans
Insurance
Low back pain
Mental health
Odds ratio
Sedentary behaviour
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Sep 2022
15 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
05
01
2022
accepted:
02
09
2022
entrez:
14
9
2022
pubmed:
15
9
2022
medline:
17
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a complex symptom with numerous possible causes and influencing factors. Understanding how modifiable factors affect the course of CLBP is important for preventing progression. As the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the lifestyle of many people, this study paper assessed whether it also changed the influence of modifiable lifestyle factors (regular exercise and sedentary behaviour) and mental health factors (anxiety and depression) on CLBP pain intensity and disability by comparing the strength of these associations before and during the pandemic. We hypothesised that the importance of regular physical activity and good mental health for CLBP patients would increase during the pandemic. These questions were investigated in a cross-sectional study of insurance claims data and self-reported data from various questionnaires from 3,478 participants in a German CLBP health intervention (2014-2021) by calculating pre- and intra-pandemic odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each variable of interest and outcome. Potential confounders were also considered. Pandemic status was treated as an effect modifier. Based on the date of enrolment, participants were classified as "pre-pandemic" or "pandemic". Regularly exercising ≥ 4 h/week significantly reduced the odds of high disability for men (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31 - 0.79, p = 0.003) and women (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14 - 0.563, p = 0.002) and reduced the probability of severe pain in women (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 - 0.65, p < 0.001). Each one-point increase in PHQ-4 score for anxiety and depression increased the OR of high pain intensity by 1.25 points (95% CI 1.18 - 1.34, p < 0.001). A clear impact of COVID-19 lockdowns was observed. In individuals who exercised ≥ 4 h/week the OR of high disability was 0.57 (95% CI 0.36 - 0.92, p = 0.021) in the pre-pandemic group compared to 0.29 (95% CI 0.12 - 0.56, p = 0.002) in the pandemic group. The probability of high disability increased from an OR of 1.42 (95% CI 1.33 - 1.52, p < 0.001) per marginal increase in the PHQ-4 scale before the pandemic, to an OR of 1.73 (95% CI 1.58 - 1.89, p < 0.001) during the pandemic. The magnitude of association of the factors that influenced high pain intensity and disability increased during the pandemic. On the one hand, the protective effect of regular exercising was greater in participants surveyed during lockdown. On the other hand, a higher risk through anxiety or depression during the lockdown was identified. An additional study with objective measures of sedentary behaviour and physical activity is needed to validate these results. More in-depth investigation of lockdown-induced associations between reduced daily physical activity, increased levels of anxiety and depression, and their effects on CLPB could also be worthwhile. This study used routinely collected data from a CLBP intervention that was previously evaluated and registered in the German Registry of Clinical Trials under DRKS00015463 (04/09/2018). The original ethics approval, informed consent and self-reported questionnaire have remained unchanged and are still valid.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a complex symptom with numerous possible causes and influencing factors. Understanding how modifiable factors affect the course of CLBP is important for preventing progression. As the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the lifestyle of many people, this study paper assessed whether it also changed the influence of modifiable lifestyle factors (regular exercise and sedentary behaviour) and mental health factors (anxiety and depression) on CLBP pain intensity and disability by comparing the strength of these associations before and during the pandemic. We hypothesised that the importance of regular physical activity and good mental health for CLBP patients would increase during the pandemic.
METHODS
METHODS
These questions were investigated in a cross-sectional study of insurance claims data and self-reported data from various questionnaires from 3,478 participants in a German CLBP health intervention (2014-2021) by calculating pre- and intra-pandemic odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each variable of interest and outcome. Potential confounders were also considered. Pandemic status was treated as an effect modifier. Based on the date of enrolment, participants were classified as "pre-pandemic" or "pandemic".
RESULTS
RESULTS
Regularly exercising ≥ 4 h/week significantly reduced the odds of high disability for men (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31 - 0.79, p = 0.003) and women (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14 - 0.563, p = 0.002) and reduced the probability of severe pain in women (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 - 0.65, p < 0.001). Each one-point increase in PHQ-4 score for anxiety and depression increased the OR of high pain intensity by 1.25 points (95% CI 1.18 - 1.34, p < 0.001). A clear impact of COVID-19 lockdowns was observed. In individuals who exercised ≥ 4 h/week the OR of high disability was 0.57 (95% CI 0.36 - 0.92, p = 0.021) in the pre-pandemic group compared to 0.29 (95% CI 0.12 - 0.56, p = 0.002) in the pandemic group. The probability of high disability increased from an OR of 1.42 (95% CI 1.33 - 1.52, p < 0.001) per marginal increase in the PHQ-4 scale before the pandemic, to an OR of 1.73 (95% CI 1.58 - 1.89, p < 0.001) during the pandemic.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The magnitude of association of the factors that influenced high pain intensity and disability increased during the pandemic. On the one hand, the protective effect of regular exercising was greater in participants surveyed during lockdown. On the other hand, a higher risk through anxiety or depression during the lockdown was identified. An additional study with objective measures of sedentary behaviour and physical activity is needed to validate these results. More in-depth investigation of lockdown-induced associations between reduced daily physical activity, increased levels of anxiety and depression, and their effects on CLPB could also be worthwhile.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This study used routinely collected data from a CLBP intervention that was previously evaluated and registered in the German Registry of Clinical Trials under DRKS00015463 (04/09/2018). The original ethics approval, informed consent and self-reported questionnaire have remained unchanged and are still valid.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36104661
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05806-8
pii: 10.1186/s12891-022-05806-8
pmc: PMC9474280
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
860Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):211-219
pubmed: 30840181
Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2:S136-68
pubmed: 16550446
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):E109-20
pubmed: 11880847
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037371
pubmed: 33591367
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Oct 22;2018:9156247
pubmed: 30425756
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Jan;43(1):1-12
pubmed: 32081511
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Oct;81(10):831-838
pubmed: 29253915
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(25):e3963
pubmed: 27336896
Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133-149
pubmed: 1408309
Pain. 2000 Dec 1;88(3):303-308
pubmed: 11068118
Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):408-423
pubmed: 29669082
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9:CD009790
pubmed: 34580864
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Dec 04;4(2):e11
pubmed: 29203460
Scott Med J. 2021 Feb;66(1):3-10
pubmed: 32718266
J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 17;13:1823-1838
pubmed: 32765057
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1724
pubmed: 33198717
J Biomech. 2020 Mar 26;102:109312
pubmed: 31451200
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1832-1842
pubmed: 27111744
J Pain Res. 2020 May 20;13:1121-1128
pubmed: 32547175
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75
pubmed: 28599680
Eur J Pain. 2020 Jan;24(1):19-38
pubmed: 31433541
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 May 1;43(3):269-278
pubmed: 28272649
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7
pubmed: 18064739
Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21
pubmed: 19996233
J Pain. 2018 Dec;19(12):1461-1470
pubmed: 30025944
Pain. 2020 Mar;161(3):651-661
pubmed: 31764390
Eur J Pain. 2021 Sep;25(8):1627-1643
pubmed: 33864327
Pain. 1997 Jun;71(2):141-7
pubmed: 9211475
Physiol Rev. 2017 Oct 1;97(4):1351-1402
pubmed: 28814614
Pain. 2009 May;143(1-2):21-5
pubmed: 19217208
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Nov;166:27-35
pubmed: 34474990
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Feb;47(1):45-52
pubmed: 29493433
Hum Factors. 2015 Nov;57(7):1162-73
pubmed: 26048874
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32
pubmed: 25599350
Pain. 2021 Feb 1;162(2):619-629
pubmed: 33230007
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Eur J Integr Med. 2020 Dec;40:101248
pubmed: 33200007
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):
pubmed: 33334073
J Osteopath Med. 2021 Mar 29;121(7):625-633
pubmed: 33770828
Pain Med. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):736-746
pubmed: 30010966
Pain Med. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):1049-1062
pubmed: 27688311
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 13;15(1):69
pubmed: 30001713
Eur J Pain. 2009 Mar;13(3):280-6
pubmed: 18524652
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 14;1:CD011279
pubmed: 28087891
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;51(19):1410-1418
pubmed: 28615218
CMAJ. 2012 Aug 7;184(11):E613-24
pubmed: 22586331
Pain. 2013 Aug;154(8):1391-401
pubmed: 23688822
Eur J Pain. 2020 Jul;24(6):1007-1022
pubmed: 32096285
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jan-Feb;64:108-110
pubmed: 32277997
J Physiother. 2021 Oct;67(4):252-262
pubmed: 34538747
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Feb 01;7(1):e000960
pubmed: 34192010
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 06;17(19):
pubmed: 33036287
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367
pubmed: 29573870
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791-2803
pubmed: 29971708
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 16;16:515
pubmed: 27306667
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):714
pubmed: 31639016
Pain. 2005 Oct;117(3):304-313
pubmed: 16153772
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):779-788
pubmed: 32526627
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 04;9:211-7
pubmed: 27217764
Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Mar;79(3):181-187
pubmed: 27171730
Healthc Policy. 2007 Nov;3(2):29-37
pubmed: 19305777
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Feb;26(1):8-14
pubmed: 21909037
Braz J Phys Ther. 2019 May - Jun;23(3):257-265
pubmed: 31130170
J Rehabil Med. 2018 Dec 25;51(1):61-70
pubmed: 30406268
Prev Med. 2017 Aug;101:204-212
pubmed: 28647545
Pain Rep. 2021 Apr 01;6(1):e919
pubmed: 33981936
Pain Physician. 2021 Aug;24(5):319-325
pubmed: 34323433
Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:120-7
pubmed: 26144686
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Sep 1;44(5):530-538
pubmed: 29542805
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(6):332-340
pubmed: 30194221
Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):607-613
pubmed: 21251757
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 3;9(1):8244
pubmed: 31160632
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Oct;56(5):585-593
pubmed: 32498492
Circ Res. 2019 Mar;124(5):799-815
pubmed: 30817262
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 15;17(1):75
pubmed: 32539720
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 May;56(5-6):765-71
pubmed: 23703496
Int J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;35(6):534-40
pubmed: 24258469