The glutamate metabotropic receptor 5 (GRM5) gene is associated with beef cattle home range and movement tortuosity.
Animal personality
Breeding programmes
Genetic associations
Grazing distribution
Grazing patterns
Steep and rugged terrain
Journal
Journal of animal science and biotechnology
ISSN: 1674-9782
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci Biotechnol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101581293
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Sep 2022
15 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
21
03
2022
accepted:
08
07
2022
entrez:
14
9
2022
pubmed:
15
9
2022
medline:
15
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The grazing behaviour of herbivores and their grazing personalities might in part be determined genetically, but there are few studies in beef cattle illustrating this. In this study, we investigated for first time the genetic variation within a candidate 'grazing gene', the glutamate metabotropic receptor 5 gene (GRM5), and tested associations between variation in that gene and variation in grazing personality behaviours (GP-behaviours) displayed by free-ranging cows during winter grazing in the steep and rugged rangelands of New Zealand. Mature beef cows (n = 303, from 3 to 10 years of age) were tracked with global positioning system (GPS) and, with 5-minutes (min) relocation frequency, various GP-behaviours were calculated. These included horizontal and vertical distances travelled, mean elevation, elevation range, elevation gain, slope, home range and movement tortuosity, variously calculated using daily relocation trajectories with repeated measurements (i.e., 7 to 24 days (d)) and satellite-derived digital elevation models (DEM). The different GP-behaviours were fitted into mixed models to ascertain their associations with variant sequences and genotypes of GRM5. We discovered three GRM5 variants (A, B and C) and identified the six possible genotypes in the cattle studied. The mixed models revealed that A was significantly associated with elevation range, home range and movement tortuosity. Similarly, GRM5 genotypes were associated (P < 0.05) to home range and movement tortuosity, while trends suggesting association (P < 0.1) were also revealed for elevation range and horizontal distance travelled. Most GP-behaviour models were improved by correcting for cow age-class as a fixed factor. The analysis of GP-behaviours averaged per cow age-class suggests that grazing personality is fully established as beef cows reached 4 years of age. Home range and movement tortuosity were not only associated with GRM5 variation, but also negatively correlated with each other (r = - 0.27, P < 0.001). There seems to be a genetically determined trade-off between home range and movement tortuosity that may be useful in beef cattle breeding programmes aiming to improve the grazing distribution and utilisation of steep and rugged rangelands.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The grazing behaviour of herbivores and their grazing personalities might in part be determined genetically, but there are few studies in beef cattle illustrating this. In this study, we investigated for first time the genetic variation within a candidate 'grazing gene', the glutamate metabotropic receptor 5 gene (GRM5), and tested associations between variation in that gene and variation in grazing personality behaviours (GP-behaviours) displayed by free-ranging cows during winter grazing in the steep and rugged rangelands of New Zealand. Mature beef cows (n = 303, from 3 to 10 years of age) were tracked with global positioning system (GPS) and, with 5-minutes (min) relocation frequency, various GP-behaviours were calculated. These included horizontal and vertical distances travelled, mean elevation, elevation range, elevation gain, slope, home range and movement tortuosity, variously calculated using daily relocation trajectories with repeated measurements (i.e., 7 to 24 days (d)) and satellite-derived digital elevation models (DEM). The different GP-behaviours were fitted into mixed models to ascertain their associations with variant sequences and genotypes of GRM5.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We discovered three GRM5 variants (A, B and C) and identified the six possible genotypes in the cattle studied. The mixed models revealed that A was significantly associated with elevation range, home range and movement tortuosity. Similarly, GRM5 genotypes were associated (P < 0.05) to home range and movement tortuosity, while trends suggesting association (P < 0.1) were also revealed for elevation range and horizontal distance travelled. Most GP-behaviour models were improved by correcting for cow age-class as a fixed factor. The analysis of GP-behaviours averaged per cow age-class suggests that grazing personality is fully established as beef cows reached 4 years of age. Home range and movement tortuosity were not only associated with GRM5 variation, but also negatively correlated with each other (r = - 0.27, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
There seems to be a genetically determined trade-off between home range and movement tortuosity that may be useful in beef cattle breeding programmes aiming to improve the grazing distribution and utilisation of steep and rugged rangelands.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36104821
doi: 10.1186/s40104-022-00755-7
pii: 10.1186/s40104-022-00755-7
pmc: PMC9476267
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
111Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Front Genet. 2014 Oct 21;5:368
pubmed: 25374582
Neurobiol Dis. 2018 Jan;109(Pt A):44-53
pubmed: 28982591
Brain Behav Evol. 2007;70(4):218-26
pubmed: 17914253
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Aug;101(8):7437-7449
pubmed: 29729921
Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):45-86
pubmed: 11271756
J Anim Sci. 2001 Jul;79(7):1883-91
pubmed: 11465377
J Neurosci. 1997 Jul 1;17(13):5196-205
pubmed: 9185557
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 28;5:131
pubmed: 30003083
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2003;100(1-4):111-23
pubmed: 14526171
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Sep;98(9):5819-28
pubmed: 26142867
J Anim Breed Genet. 2015 Feb;132(1):42-50
pubmed: 25174988
J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2019 Nov 17;7(1):1-5
pubmed: 32219103
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 1;13(10):e0204619
pubmed: 30273367
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Feb 12;7(2):191849
pubmed: 32257341
Behav Processes. 2009 Nov;82(3):319-26
pubmed: 19660534
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 7;277(1684):1093-9
pubmed: 19955156
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7453-7464
pubmed: 31350260
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 05;8(8):e70415
pubmed: 23940572
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Aug 14;7:494
pubmed: 32923468
Nature. 1993 Jan 7;361(6407):31-9
pubmed: 8421494
Anal Biochem. 2006 Jul 1;354(1):159-61
pubmed: 16643836
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):291-318
pubmed: 17437562
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Feb;237(2):345-361
pubmed: 31646346
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Feb 25;7:74
pubmed: 32158770
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jul;19(7):372-8
pubmed: 16701288
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 May;85(2):301-25
pubmed: 19961473
Anal Biochem. 2009 Feb 1;385(1):174-5
pubmed: 19013423
J Biol Chem. 2003 Aug 29;278(35):33105-19
pubmed: 12783878
Genes Dev. 2016 Aug 1;30(15):1761-75
pubmed: 27542830
Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Nov;93(5):496-503
pubmed: 15280896