Carbon footprint of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.
Atrial fibrillation
Carbon footprint
Catheter ablation
Eco-audit
Environment
Journal
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 02 2023
16 02 2023
Historique:
received:
03
06
2022
accepted:
08
08
2022
pubmed:
16
9
2022
medline:
22
2
2023
entrez:
15
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Climate change represents the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. Health care system is itself a large contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In cardiology, atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is an increasing activity using numerous non-reusable materials that could contribute to GHG emission. Determining a detailed carbon footprint analysis of an AF catheter ablation procedure allows the identification of the main polluting sources that give opportunities for reduction of environmental impact. To assess the carbon footprint of AF catheter ablation procedure. To determine priority actions to decrease pollution. An eco-audit method used to predict the GHG emission of an AF catheter ablation procedure was investigated. Two workstations were considered including surgery and anaesthesia. In the operating room, every waste produced by single-use medical devices, pharmaceutical drugs, and energy consumption during intervention were evaluated. All analyses were limited to the operating room. Thirty procedures were analysed over a period of 8 weeks: 18 pulmonary veins isolation RF ablations, 7 complex RF procedures including PVI, roof and mitral isthmus lines, ethanol infusion of the Marshall vein and cavo tricuspid isthmus line, and 5 pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon. The mean emission during AF catheter ablation procedures was 76.9 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e). The operating field accounted for 75.4% of the carbon footprint, while only 24.6% for the anaesthesia workstation. On one hand, material production and manufacturing were the most polluting phases of product life cycle which, respectively, represented 71.3% (54.8 kg of CO2-e) and 17.0% (13.1 kg of CO2-e) of total pollution. On the other hand, transport contributed in 10.6% (8.1 kg of CO2-e), while product use resulted in 1.1% (0.9 kg of CO2-e) of GHG production. Electrophysiology catheters were demonstrated to be the main contributors of environmental impact with 29.9 kg of CO2-e (i.e. 38.8%). Three dimensional mapping system and electrocardiogram patches were accounting for 6.8 kg of CO2-e (i.e. 8.8% of total). AF catheter ablation involves a mean of 76.9 kg of CO2-e. With an estimated 600 000 annual worldwide procedures, the environmental impact of AF catheter ablation activity is estimated equal to 125 tons of CO2 emission each day. It represents an equivalent of 700 000 km of car ride every day. Electrophysiology catheters and patches are the main contributors of the carbon footprint. The focus must be on reducing, reusing, and recycling these items to limit the impact of AF ablation on the environment. A road map of steps to implement in different time frames is proposed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36107465
pii: 6701534
doi: 10.1093/europace/euac160
pmc: PMC10103577
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
331-340Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Références
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):461
pubmed: 31039773
Europace. 2022 Sep 1;24(8):1300-1306
pubmed: 35943366
Lancet. 2019 Nov 16;394(10211):1836-1878
pubmed: 31733928
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Dec;39(12):2088-2097
pubmed: 33284689
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 3;49(3):1779-86
pubmed: 25517602
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Jul;129(7):76001
pubmed: 34251875
Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2020;25(10):1930-1941
pubmed: 32863598
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743
pubmed: 33501848
Eye (Lond). 2013 Apr;27(4):495-501
pubmed: 23429413
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 1;60(6):1325-1331
pubmed: 34411226