Comparison of rectum fecal bacterial community of finishing bulls fed high-concentrate diets with active dry yeast and yeast culture supplementation.

16S rDNA Active Dry Yeast Cattle Intestinal Bacteria Yeast Culture

Journal

Animal bioscience
ISSN: 2765-0189
Titre abrégé: Anim Biosci
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101774366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 29 05 2022
accepted: 14 08 2022
pubmed: 16 9 2022
medline: 16 9 2022
entrez: 15 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of feeding active dry yeast (ADY) and yeast culture (YC) on fecal bacterial community in finishing bulls fed high-concentrate diets in the same experimental environment. Forty-five healthy finishing cattle (Simmental×Chinese Luxi yellow bulls; 24 months; 505±29 kg) were randomly divided into three groups: i) CON group (control group, only fed basal diet), ii) ADY group (fed basal diet + active dry yeast), and iii) YC group (fed basal diet + yeast culture). At the end of the trial, nine rectum fecal samples were randomly selected from each group for bacterial DNA sequencing. There was no difference among groups about alpha diversity indices (all p>0.05), including ACE, Chao 1, Shannon, and Simpson indices. Principal component analysis and non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis showed a high similarity among three groups. Compared with CON group, ADY and YC groups had greater relative abundance of c_Clostridia, o_Oscillospirales, and f_Oscillospiraceae, but lesser relative abundance of g_Megasphaera, and s_Megasphaera_elsdenii (all p<0.01). And, the relative abundances of p_Firmicutes (p = 0.03), s_Prevotella_sp (p = 0.03), o_Clostridiales (p<0.01), g_Clostridium (p<0.01), f_Caloramatoraceae (p<0.01), and f_Ruminococcaceae (p = 0.04) were increased in the ADY group. The PICRUSt2 prediction results showed that the metabolic pathways had no significant differences among groups (p>0.05). Besides, the relative abundance of c_Clostridia (r = 0.42), and f_Oscillospiraceae (r = 0.40) were positively correlated to average daily gain of finishing bulls (p<0.05). Both of ADY and YC had no effect on diversity of fecal bacteria in finishing bulls, but the supplementation of ADY and YC can improve the large intestinal function in finishing bulls by increasing the abundance of cellulolytic bacteria and altering the abundance of lactic acid-utilizing bacteria.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36108683
pii: ab.22.0215
doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0215
pmc: PMC9834660
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

63-74

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 32060763
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31660669
Organisme : Jilin Science and Technology Development Program
ID : YDZJ202203CGZH042
Organisme : Jilin Science and Technology Development Program
ID : 20220202048NC

Références

Anim Sci J. 2016 Aug;87(8):982-8
pubmed: 26472702
J Anim Sci. 2020 Apr 1;98(4):
pubmed: 32068850
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Mar;19(3):835-841
pubmed: 28028921
J Dairy Sci. 1987 Oct;70(10):2063-8
pubmed: 3680724
Nat Chem Biol. 2011 Dec 15;8(1):36-45
pubmed: 22173358
J Dairy Sci. 1995 Feb;78(2):412-20
pubmed: 7745162
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Dec;99(12):9668-9681
pubmed: 27692708
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 06;10(10):
pubmed: 33036177
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov;69(11):6808-15
pubmed: 14602644
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 9;10(1):9364
pubmed: 32518316
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jul;76(14):4858-62
pubmed: 20472731
J Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 7;96(9):3916-3927
pubmed: 30060086
Food Res Int. 2020 Jun;132:109049
pubmed: 32331677
J Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 29;96(10):4385-4397
pubmed: 30184125
Cell Host Microbe. 2016 Apr 13;19(4):443-54
pubmed: 27078066
Reprod Nutr Dev. 2005 Jul-Aug;45(4):427-40
pubmed: 16045891
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Feb;78(4):1203-14
pubmed: 22156428
ISME J. 2012 Mar;6(3):531-41
pubmed: 21938024
Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2014;79:161-2
pubmed: 25227304
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 25;13:842437
pubmed: 35283814
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85423
pubmed: 24465556
Bioinformatics. 2014 Nov 1;30(21):3123-4
pubmed: 25061070
Microbiol Rev. 1986 Dec;50(4):484-524
pubmed: 3540574
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(9):2992-3001
pubmed: 21378055
Anim Nutr. 2021 Mar;7(1):31-41
pubmed: 33997329
Animal. 2022 May;16(5):100517
pubmed: 35436649
Trends Microbiol. 2016 May;24(5):402-413
pubmed: 26996765
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep;109(3):783-91
pubmed: 20337759
J Anim Sci. 2014 Feb;92(2):683-94
pubmed: 24352967
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 19;8:8
pubmed: 28116074
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Dec;44(12):4537-40
pubmed: 17005743
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 01;10(6):e0129174
pubmed: 26030887
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 25;22(13):
pubmed: 34202141
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jan 19;9(1):
pubmed: 30669471
J Appl Microbiol. 2019 Jul;127(1):2-11
pubmed: 30694580
Gastroenterology. 1976 Nov;71(5):793-6
pubmed: 1085711
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 17;107(33):14691-6
pubmed: 20679230
Curr Microbiol. 2013 Aug;67(2):130-7
pubmed: 23471692
Microbiologyopen. 2019 Oct;8(10):e898
pubmed: 31271529
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jun;92(6):2538-45
pubmed: 24778329
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Jun;87(6):1832-9
pubmed: 15453499
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jul;102(7):6180-6198
pubmed: 31056321
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019 Sep 4;10:68
pubmed: 31508230
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1497-509
pubmed: 18349243
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Dec 06;8:237
pubmed: 23217205
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 Jun;17(6):659-65
pubmed: 20495561
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999 Jan;49 Pt 1:43-50
pubmed: 10028246
J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):1120-30
pubmed: 21415422

Auteurs

Kai Gao (K)

Agricultural College, Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China.
Engineering Research Center of NorthEast Cold Region Beef Cattle Science & Technology Innovation, Ministry of Education, Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China.

Chunyin Geng (C)

Agricultural College, Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China.
Engineering Research Center of NorthEast Cold Region Beef Cattle Science & Technology Innovation, Ministry of Education, Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China.

Classifications MeSH