The role of machine learning in developing non-magnetic resonance imaging based biomarkers for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

Deep learning Disease progression Medical informatics Multiple sclerosis Prognosis Supervised machine learning Systematic review

Journal

BMC medical informatics and decision making
ISSN: 1472-6947
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088682

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 09 2022
Historique:
received: 15 04 2021
accepted: 02 09 2022
entrez: 15 9 2022
pubmed: 16 9 2022
medline: 20 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological condition whose symptoms, severity, and progression over time vary enormously among individuals. Ideally, each person living with MS should be provided with an accurate prognosis at the time of diagnosis, precision in initial and subsequent treatment decisions, and improved timeliness in detecting the need to reassess treatment regimens. To manage these three components, discovering an accurate, objective measure of overall disease severity is essential. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can contribute to finding such a clinically useful biomarker of MS through their ability to search and analyze datasets about potential biomarkers at scale. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review to determine how, and in what way, ML has been applied to the study of MS biomarkers on data from sources other than magnetic resonance imaging. Systematic searches through eight databases were conducted for literature published in 2014-2020 on MS and specified ML algorithms. Of the 1, 052 returned papers, 66 met the inclusion criteria. All included papers addressed developing classifiers for MS identification or measuring its progression, typically, using hold-out evaluation on subsets of fewer than 200 participants with MS. These classifiers focused on biomarkers of MS, ranging from those derived from omics and phenotypical data (34.5% clinical, 33.3% biological, 23.0% physiological, and 9.2% drug response). Algorithmic choices were dependent on both the amount of data available for supervised ML (91.5%; 49.2% classification and 42.3% regression) and the requirement to be able to justify the resulting decision-making principles in healthcare settings. Therefore, algorithms based on decision trees and support vector machines were commonly used, and the maximum average performance of 89.9% AUC was found in random forests comparing with other ML algorithms. ML is applicable to determining how candidate biomarkers perform in the assessment of disease severity. However, applying ML research to develop decision aids to help clinicians optimize treatment strategies and analyze treatment responses in individual patients calls for creating appropriate data resources and shared experimental protocols. They should target proceeding from segregated classification of signals or natural language to both holistic analyses across data modalities and clinically-meaningful differentiation of disease.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological condition whose symptoms, severity, and progression over time vary enormously among individuals. Ideally, each person living with MS should be provided with an accurate prognosis at the time of diagnosis, precision in initial and subsequent treatment decisions, and improved timeliness in detecting the need to reassess treatment regimens. To manage these three components, discovering an accurate, objective measure of overall disease severity is essential. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can contribute to finding such a clinically useful biomarker of MS through their ability to search and analyze datasets about potential biomarkers at scale. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review to determine how, and in what way, ML has been applied to the study of MS biomarkers on data from sources other than magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS
Systematic searches through eight databases were conducted for literature published in 2014-2020 on MS and specified ML algorithms.
RESULTS
Of the 1, 052 returned papers, 66 met the inclusion criteria. All included papers addressed developing classifiers for MS identification or measuring its progression, typically, using hold-out evaluation on subsets of fewer than 200 participants with MS. These classifiers focused on biomarkers of MS, ranging from those derived from omics and phenotypical data (34.5% clinical, 33.3% biological, 23.0% physiological, and 9.2% drug response). Algorithmic choices were dependent on both the amount of data available for supervised ML (91.5%; 49.2% classification and 42.3% regression) and the requirement to be able to justify the resulting decision-making principles in healthcare settings. Therefore, algorithms based on decision trees and support vector machines were commonly used, and the maximum average performance of 89.9% AUC was found in random forests comparing with other ML algorithms.
CONCLUSIONS
ML is applicable to determining how candidate biomarkers perform in the assessment of disease severity. However, applying ML research to develop decision aids to help clinicians optimize treatment strategies and analyze treatment responses in individual patients calls for creating appropriate data resources and shared experimental protocols. They should target proceeding from segregated classification of signals or natural language to both holistic analyses across data modalities and clinically-meaningful differentiation of disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36109726
doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01985-5
pii: 10.1186/s12911-022-01985-5
pmc: PMC9476596
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

242

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Oct;13(10):e006556
pubmed: 33079589
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2007 Jun;6(3):163-82
pubmed: 17511614
BMC Neurol. 2020 Mar 21;20(1):105
pubmed: 32199461
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Jan;19:99-104
pubmed: 29182996
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Apr;43(2):223-232
pubmed: 28340542
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jun;31:12-21
pubmed: 30877925
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):24
pubmed: 28241760
Mycoses. 2016 Nov;59(11):697-704
pubmed: 27061227
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0165543
pubmed: 27846233
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Feb;28:11-16
pubmed: 30529925
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018 May 1;8(5):
pubmed: 29358319
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Mar;69(3):89-95
pubmed: 11240971
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jul 27;7(7):e10961
pubmed: 30054262
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):504-515
pubmed: 33319904
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Sep 7;18(1):401
pubmed: 28882107
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2019 Mar 18;5(1):2055217319837254
pubmed: 30911402
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 May;15(5):287-300
pubmed: 30940920
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 May;4(3):192-201
pubmed: 26008936
BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):12
pubmed: 29458348
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Jan;65:34-45
pubmed: 27871823
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 Oct;150:73-84
pubmed: 28859830
Brief Bioinform. 2016 Jan;17(1):132-44
pubmed: 25935162
BMC Neurol. 2011 Jun 07;11:67
pubmed: 21649880
Int J Biostat. 2016 May 1;12(1):117-29
pubmed: 26529567
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:4443-6
pubmed: 26737281
Int J MS Care. 2015 May-Jun;17(3):122-9
pubmed: 26052257
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1007-1027
pubmed: 32578287
Ann Hum Genet. 2020 Jan;84(1):1-10
pubmed: 31396954
LREC Int Conf Lang Resour Eval. 2018 May;2018:156-165
pubmed: 29911205
J Health Psychol. 2011 Apr;16(3):478-88
pubmed: 21135061
Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):544-50
pubmed: 25552422
Neurology (ECronicon). 2016;4(2):41-45
pubmed: 28066845
J Pers Med. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):
pubmed: 34442434
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):184-192
pubmed: 30157522
Mult Scler. 2015 Jun;21(7):894-904
pubmed: 25392319
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 07;21(8):e13003
pubmed: 31392963
Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 18;10:781
pubmed: 31379730
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e100052
pubmed: 24932510
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 07;18(6):
pubmed: 28590455
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0174866
pubmed: 28379999
Neurol Sci. 2020 Feb;41(2):459-462
pubmed: 31659583
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1269-1279
pubmed: 33145866
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 16;18(12):e323
pubmed: 27986644
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Aug 10;20:506-522
pubmed: 30167371
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Dec;88:11-19
pubmed: 30368002
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Mar 11;14(1):19
pubmed: 28284217
PLoS Genet. 2019 Jan 17;15(1):e1007808
pubmed: 30653506
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10189
pubmed: 31308384
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 03;7:41473
pubmed: 28155867
Front Neurosci. 2017 Oct 12;11:540
pubmed: 29075174
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 19;11(7):e0158982
pubmed: 27434641
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 5;8(1):14884
pubmed: 30291263
BMC Neurol. 2014 Mar 25;14:58
pubmed: 24666846
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Sep;85:30-39
pubmed: 30016722
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Dec;115:103492
pubmed: 31627017
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):262
pubmed: 33046051
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
Trends Immunol. 2015 Dec;36(12):763-777
pubmed: 26572555
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017 Nov 15;8(11):2402-2413
pubmed: 28768105
Comput Biol Med. 2019 May;108:354-370
pubmed: 31054502
F1000Res. 2017 Dec 22;6:2172
pubmed: 29904574
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 6;9(1):16154
pubmed: 31695127
Mol Neurobiol. 2020 Feb;57(2):1245-1258
pubmed: 31721043
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):508-13
pubmed: 26911815
J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Mar;139(3):683-691
pubmed: 30342048
J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Jan 1;311:377-384
pubmed: 30243994
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):169-180
pubmed: 29320652
Brain Topogr. 2018 May;31(3):346-363
pubmed: 29380079
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10;(1):224-233
pubmed: 27830255
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jun 19;12:1043-1053
pubmed: 29950817
Front Neurol. 2018 Jul 13;9:561
pubmed: 30057565
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(8. Vyp. 2):70-76
pubmed: 30160671
Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):255-60
pubmed: 26185243
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178366
pubmed: 28570570
Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2015 Oct;71(Pt 10):1273-81
pubmed: 26457518
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2017 Dec;40(4):785-797
pubmed: 28887746
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Feb 1;104(2):341-348
pubmed: 30165404
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 30;21(8):e14863
pubmed: 31471961
Mol Med Rep. 2019 Jul;20(1):678-684
pubmed: 31180553
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2014 Nov;3(6):670-7
pubmed: 25891545
Can J Diabetes. 2014 Aug;38(4):256-62
pubmed: 25023738
Metab Brain Dis. 2019 Oct;34(5):1401-1413
pubmed: 31302813
Front Neurol. 2016 Aug 15;7:131
pubmed: 27574516
Mult Scler. 2019 Dec;25(14):1828-1834
pubmed: 31120376
Microbiome. 2018 Dec 13;6(1):221
pubmed: 30545401
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0182806
pubmed: 28837609
Nat Med. 2019 Aug;25(8):1290-1300
pubmed: 31332391
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Nov;36:101407
pubmed: 31563073
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Feb;169:9-18
pubmed: 30638593

Auteurs

Md Zakir Hossain (MZ)

School of Computing, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia. zakir.hossain@anu.edu.au.

Elena Daskalaki (E)

School of Computing, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Anne Brüstle (A)

The John Curtin School of Medical Research, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Jane Desborough (J)

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Christian J Lueck (CJ)

Department of Neurology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
ANU Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Hanna Suominen (H)

School of Computing, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Department of Computing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH