A novel molecular signature identifies mixed subtypes in renal cell carcinoma with poor prognosis and independent response to immunotherapy.
Cancer-specific survival
Gene expression deconvolution
Immunotherapy
RCC subtypes
Renal cell carcinoma
Journal
Genome medicine
ISSN: 1756-994X
Titre abrégé: Genome Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101475844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 09 2022
15 09 2022
Historique:
received:
05
08
2021
accepted:
10
08
2022
entrez:
15
9
2022
pubmed:
16
9
2022
medline:
20
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease comprising histologically defined subtypes. For therapy selection, precise subtype identification and individualized prognosis are mandatory, but currently limited. Our aim was to refine subtyping and outcome prediction across main subtypes, assuming that a tumor is composed of molecular features present in distinct pathological subtypes. Individual RCC samples were modeled as linear combination of the main subtypes (clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), chromophobe (chRCC)) using computational gene expression deconvolution. The new molecular subtyping was compared with histological classification of RCC using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n = 864; ccRCC: 512; pRCC: 287; chRCC: 65) as well as 92 independent histopathologically well-characterized RCC. Predicted continuous subtypes were correlated to cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the TCGA cohort and validated in 242 independent RCC. Association with treatment-related progression-free survival (PFS) was studied in the JAVELIN Renal 101 (n = 726) and IMmotion151 trials (n = 823). CSS and PFS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. One hundred seventy-four signature genes enabled reference-free molecular classification of individual RCC. We unambiguously assign tumors to either ccRCC, pRCC, or chRCC and uncover molecularly heterogeneous tumors (e.g., with ccRCC and pRCC features), which are at risk of worse outcome. Assigned proportions of molecular subtype-features significantly correlated with CSS (ccRCC (P = 4.1E - 10), pRCC (P = 6.5E - 10), chRCC (P = 8.6E - 06)) in TCGA. Translation into a numerical RCC-R(isk) score enabled prognosis in TCGA (P = 9.5E - 11). Survival modeling based on the RCC-R score compared to pathological categories was significantly improved (P = 3.6E - 11). The RCC-R score was validated in univariate (P = 3.2E - 05; HR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.8-5.08) and multivariate analyses including clinicopathological factors (P = 0.018; HR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.14-4.04). Heterogeneous PD-L1-positive RCC determined by molecular subtyping showed increased PFS with checkpoint inhibition versus sunitinib in the JAVELIN Renal 101 (P = 3.3E - 04; HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36 - 0.75) and IMmotion151 trials (P = 0.047; HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48 - 1). The prediction of PFS significantly benefits from classification into heterogeneous and unambiguous subtypes in both cohorts (P = 0.013 and P = 0.032). Switching from categorical to continuous subtype classification across most frequent RCC subtypes enables outcome prediction and fosters personalized treatment strategies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease comprising histologically defined subtypes. For therapy selection, precise subtype identification and individualized prognosis are mandatory, but currently limited. Our aim was to refine subtyping and outcome prediction across main subtypes, assuming that a tumor is composed of molecular features present in distinct pathological subtypes.
METHODS
Individual RCC samples were modeled as linear combination of the main subtypes (clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), chromophobe (chRCC)) using computational gene expression deconvolution. The new molecular subtyping was compared with histological classification of RCC using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n = 864; ccRCC: 512; pRCC: 287; chRCC: 65) as well as 92 independent histopathologically well-characterized RCC. Predicted continuous subtypes were correlated to cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the TCGA cohort and validated in 242 independent RCC. Association with treatment-related progression-free survival (PFS) was studied in the JAVELIN Renal 101 (n = 726) and IMmotion151 trials (n = 823). CSS and PFS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS
One hundred seventy-four signature genes enabled reference-free molecular classification of individual RCC. We unambiguously assign tumors to either ccRCC, pRCC, or chRCC and uncover molecularly heterogeneous tumors (e.g., with ccRCC and pRCC features), which are at risk of worse outcome. Assigned proportions of molecular subtype-features significantly correlated with CSS (ccRCC (P = 4.1E - 10), pRCC (P = 6.5E - 10), chRCC (P = 8.6E - 06)) in TCGA. Translation into a numerical RCC-R(isk) score enabled prognosis in TCGA (P = 9.5E - 11). Survival modeling based on the RCC-R score compared to pathological categories was significantly improved (P = 3.6E - 11). The RCC-R score was validated in univariate (P = 3.2E - 05; HR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.8-5.08) and multivariate analyses including clinicopathological factors (P = 0.018; HR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.14-4.04). Heterogeneous PD-L1-positive RCC determined by molecular subtyping showed increased PFS with checkpoint inhibition versus sunitinib in the JAVELIN Renal 101 (P = 3.3E - 04; HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36 - 0.75) and IMmotion151 trials (P = 0.047; HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48 - 1). The prediction of PFS significantly benefits from classification into heterogeneous and unambiguous subtypes in both cohorts (P = 0.013 and P = 0.032).
CONCLUSION
Switching from categorical to continuous subtype classification across most frequent RCC subtypes enables outcome prediction and fosters personalized treatment strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36109798
doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01105-y
pii: 10.1186/s13073-022-01105-y
pmc: PMC9476269
doi:
Substances chimiques
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Sunitinib
V99T50803M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2817-26
pubmed: 15591335
BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 11;15:1087
pubmed: 25495041
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1396-1407
pubmed: 29641966
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 29;:JCO2018790253
pubmed: 30372392
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 15;27(10):2868-2878
pubmed: 33722896
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 May 5;44(8):e71
pubmed: 26704973
Nat Cancer. 2020 Aug;1(8):800-810
pubmed: 35122049
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):604-610
pubmed: 27993815
BMC Cancer. 2009 May 18;9:152
pubmed: 19445733
Nature. 2019 May;569(7757):503-508
pubmed: 31068700
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Mar 1;113(3):234-243
pubmed: 32359162
Cell Syst. 2018 Mar 28;6(3):271-281.e7
pubmed: 29596782
Cell Rep. 2016 Mar 15;14(10):2476-89
pubmed: 26947078
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):77-84
pubmed: 24613583
Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 13;7(37):59336-59359
pubmed: 27449081
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D941-D947
pubmed: 30371878
Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 1;67(7):3171-6
pubmed: 17409424
Genomics. 2012 Dec;100(6):337-44
pubmed: 22959562
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):135-45
pubmed: 26536169
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 20;6:29930
pubmed: 27435027
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1016-20
pubmed: 26072688
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 06;13:33
pubmed: 23496923
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 29;:JCO2018790147
pubmed: 30372388
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Nov 10;33(20):e175
pubmed: 16284200
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Oct 15;7(11):7312-8
pubmed: 25550767
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 8;366(10):883-892
pubmed: 22397650
Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2404-2415
pubmed: 31079938
Nat Rev Urol. 2019 Sep;16(9):539-552
pubmed: 31278395
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127
pubmed: 30779529
Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1519-1530
pubmed: 33020645
Cancer Cell. 2014 Sep 8;26(3):319-330
pubmed: 25155756
BMC Med. 2018 Jul 5;16(1):108
pubmed: 29973214
Eur Urol. 2022 Jul 16;:
pubmed: 35853783
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2005-14
pubmed: 26412349
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2363-7
pubmed: 20688976
Cancer Cell. 2020 Dec 14;38(6):803-817.e4
pubmed: 33157048
Mod Pathol. 2022 Jun;35(6):825-835
pubmed: 34949764
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):93-105
pubmed: 26935559
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Sep 15;19(18):5170-81
pubmed: 23881922
Cell Rep. 2018 Apr 3;23(1):313-326.e5
pubmed: 29617669
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 29;:JCO2018791905
pubmed: 30372394
Cell. 2019 Oct 31;179(4):964-983.e31
pubmed: 31675502
Nature. 2013 Jul 4;499(7456):43-9
pubmed: 23792563
PLoS Med. 2006 Jan;3(1):e13
pubmed: 16318415
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):799-810
pubmed: 30803729
Cell. 2018 Apr 5;173(2):400-416.e11
pubmed: 29625055
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 15;23(14):1846-7
pubmed: 17496320
Int J Cancer. 2008 Sep 1;123(5):1126-32
pubmed: 18546273
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1103-1115
pubmed: 30779531
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1733-1741
pubmed: 32895571
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2395-2405
pubmed: 31157962
PLoS Genet. 2008 Sep 05;4(9):e1000176
pubmed: 18773095
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612
pubmed: 24113773
Nat Commun. 2017 May 10;8:15165
pubmed: 28489074
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1370-1385
pubmed: 31427204
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):676-85
pubmed: 25979595
Nat Genet. 2012 Jun 10;44(7):751-9
pubmed: 22683710
BMC Cancer. 2010 May 12;10:196
pubmed: 20462447
Hum Pathol. 2019 Jan;83:212-223
pubmed: 30121370