Cartilage Graft in Myringoplasty: What Are the Factors Influencing Hearing Gain?
Cartilage
Eardrum
Graft
Hearing loss
Myringoplasty
Journal
Journal of audiology & otology
ISSN: 2384-1621
Titre abrégé: J Audiol Otol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101657815
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
07
03
2022
accepted:
13
07
2022
pubmed:
17
9
2022
medline:
17
9
2022
entrez:
16
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present the anatomical and functional results on the use of cartilage in myringoplasty and use the data to analyze the factors influencing hearing gain. This retrospective study included 161 cases of cartilage myringoplasties collected over an 11-year period (2010-2020). Of the 161 cases, the etiology of the tympanic perforations was simple chronic otitis media in 154 (95.65%) ears and traumatic in 7 (4.35%) ears. The mean preoperative Rinne was 26.20±7.05 dB. The most commonly used approach was retroauricular, and the common graft material was tragal or conqual cartilage. After the follow-up period (mean:15 months), the anatomical success rate was 93.2%; there were nine cases of reperforation, of which three were reoperated with a good final result. The hearing success rate (residual Rinne ≤20 dB) was 91.9% with an average gain of 11.48±8.62 dB. The only factor significantly influencing the anatomical outcome was the history of chronic rhinosinusitis. In univariate studies, several factors influencing the functional result were revealed; the only one retained after elimination of bias was the anatomical result. We recommend cartilage as the material of choice for myringoplasties as it has been shown to be resistant to predictive factors of failure after tympanic repair surgery. We recommend the adequate management of all chronic rhinosinusitis before performing myringoplasty.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
We present the anatomical and functional results on the use of cartilage in myringoplasty and use the data to analyze the factors influencing hearing gain.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective study included 161 cases of cartilage myringoplasties collected over an 11-year period (2010-2020). Of the 161 cases, the etiology of the tympanic perforations was simple chronic otitis media in 154 (95.65%) ears and traumatic in 7 (4.35%) ears. The mean preoperative Rinne was 26.20±7.05 dB. The most commonly used approach was retroauricular, and the common graft material was tragal or conqual cartilage.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After the follow-up period (mean:15 months), the anatomical success rate was 93.2%; there were nine cases of reperforation, of which three were reoperated with a good final result. The hearing success rate (residual Rinne ≤20 dB) was 91.9% with an average gain of 11.48±8.62 dB. The only factor significantly influencing the anatomical outcome was the history of chronic rhinosinusitis. In univariate studies, several factors influencing the functional result were revealed; the only one retained after elimination of bias was the anatomical result.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We recommend cartilage as the material of choice for myringoplasties as it has been shown to be resistant to predictive factors of failure after tympanic repair surgery. We recommend the adequate management of all chronic rhinosinusitis before performing myringoplasty.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36111452
pii: jao.2022.00108
doi: 10.7874/jao.2022.00108
pmc: PMC9597273
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
208-213Références
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;270(11):2803-13
pubmed: 23321796
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;268(3):471-4
pubmed: 21267588
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2010 Mar-Apr;61(2):100-5
pubmed: 19897170
Laryngoscope. 1997 Aug;107(8):1094-9
pubmed: 9261014
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):1172-1176
pubmed: 33782256
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Jan;30(1):33-36
pubmed: 31931929
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jul;265(7):739-42
pubmed: 18351372
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jul;126(7):1662-70
pubmed: 26542167
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jun;34(4):705-10
pubmed: 23652328
Acta Otolaryngol. 2018 Jan;138(1):10-15
pubmed: 28893121
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2011 May-Jun;62(3):213-9
pubmed: 21315317
J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Apr;127(4):354-8
pubmed: 23433000
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Jun;98(6):546-51
pubmed: 3138610
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;11(1):23-29
pubmed: 28797141
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014 Oct;41(5):422-7
pubmed: 24925703
J Laryngol Otol. 1985 Jul;99(7):637-42
pubmed: 4020255
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Aug;48(4):601-608
pubmed: 33257105
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;270(11):2833-7
pubmed: 23266869
Laryngoscope. 2003 Nov;113(11):1844-56
pubmed: 14603038
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Jul;122(7):663-72
pubmed: 18312709
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2016;59(1):10-3
pubmed: 27131350
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Mar;28(2):e106-e110
pubmed: 27984431
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Feb 5;123(3):301-4
pubmed: 20193249
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009 Feb;29(1):27-32
pubmed: 19609379