Follow-up ultrasonographic findings among children treated conservatively for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
Acute appendicitis
Appendix
Children
Conservative treatment
Follow-up
Recurrence
Ultrasound
Journal
Pediatric radiology
ISSN: 1432-1998
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0365332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
23
05
2022
accepted:
25
08
2022
revised:
29
07
2022
pubmed:
17
9
2022
medline:
4
2
2023
entrez:
16
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ultrasound is an accurate tool for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Conservative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis is feasible and safe in children. However, no sonographic follow-up results from children with nonoperatively managed acute appendicitis have been reported. To describe the sonographic appearance of the appendix at follow-up ultrasound and to attempt to identify signs predictive of recurrent acute appendicitis. Children diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis and treated conservatively in our hospital from 2014 to 2019, and who presented for follow-up ultrasound at 3, 6 and 9 months, were included in our study. Clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data were recorded. By the end of follow-up, 29 (14.2%) of 204 children in the cohort had developed recurrent acute appendicitis and 175 had recovered uneventfully. On follow-up ultrasound, appendiceal diameter measured > 6 mm in 56/204 (27.5%) cases at 3 months and in 9/26 (34.5%) at 6 months. After 3 months, 102/204 (50%) children had normal appendiceal diameter on ultrasound. Appendiceal diameter > 6 mm was associated with intraluminal fluid or sludge in the appendiceal lumen at 3- and 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Comparing cases with and without recurrence, at 3-month follow-up, appendiceal diameter > 6 mm was found in 17/29 (58.6%) cases vs. 39/175 (22.3%), respectively (P < 0.001). Appendiceal diameter returned to normal in 12/19 (63.2%) cases in the nonrecurrent acute appendicitis group compared with 2/7 (28.6%) in the recurrent acute appendicitis group (P = 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Intraluminal fluid or sludge was detected more frequently in the recurrent acute appendicitis versus the nonrecurrent acute appendicitis group at 3- (P < 0.001) and 6-month (P = 0.001) follow-up. Progressive normalization of appendiceal diameter was noted on follow-up ultrasound. The prevalence of both appendiceal diameter > 6 mm and intraluminal fluid or sludge were found to be increased in children who later developed recurrent acute appendicitis. Ultrasound appears to be a useful tool for follow-up in children with conservatively treated uncomplicated acute appendicitis and possibly might help predict recurrence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ultrasound is an accurate tool for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Conservative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis is feasible and safe in children. However, no sonographic follow-up results from children with nonoperatively managed acute appendicitis have been reported.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the sonographic appearance of the appendix at follow-up ultrasound and to attempt to identify signs predictive of recurrent acute appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Children diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis and treated conservatively in our hospital from 2014 to 2019, and who presented for follow-up ultrasound at 3, 6 and 9 months, were included in our study. Clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data were recorded.
RESULTS
By the end of follow-up, 29 (14.2%) of 204 children in the cohort had developed recurrent acute appendicitis and 175 had recovered uneventfully. On follow-up ultrasound, appendiceal diameter measured > 6 mm in 56/204 (27.5%) cases at 3 months and in 9/26 (34.5%) at 6 months. After 3 months, 102/204 (50%) children had normal appendiceal diameter on ultrasound. Appendiceal diameter > 6 mm was associated with intraluminal fluid or sludge in the appendiceal lumen at 3- and 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Comparing cases with and without recurrence, at 3-month follow-up, appendiceal diameter > 6 mm was found in 17/29 (58.6%) cases vs. 39/175 (22.3%), respectively (P < 0.001). Appendiceal diameter returned to normal in 12/19 (63.2%) cases in the nonrecurrent acute appendicitis group compared with 2/7 (28.6%) in the recurrent acute appendicitis group (P = 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Intraluminal fluid or sludge was detected more frequently in the recurrent acute appendicitis versus the nonrecurrent acute appendicitis group at 3- (P < 0.001) and 6-month (P = 0.001) follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Progressive normalization of appendiceal diameter was noted on follow-up ultrasound. The prevalence of both appendiceal diameter > 6 mm and intraluminal fluid or sludge were found to be increased in children who later developed recurrent acute appendicitis. Ultrasound appears to be a useful tool for follow-up in children with conservatively treated uncomplicated acute appendicitis and possibly might help predict recurrence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36112194
doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05497-2
pii: 10.1007/s00247-022-05497-2
pmc: PMC9483395
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sewage
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
223-234Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Rentea RM, St Peter SD (2017) Pediatric appendicitis. Surg Clin North Am 97:93–112
doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2016.08.009
St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Holcomb GW et al (2008) An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 43:2242–2245
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.051
Reynolds SL, Jaffe DM (1992) Diagnosing abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 8:126–128
doi: 10.1097/00006565-199206000-00003
Scholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP et al (1996) Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics 98:680–685
doi: 10.1542/peds.98.4.680
Huang L, Yin Y, Yang L et al (2017) Comparison of antibiotic therapy and appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 171:426–434
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0057
Tanaka Y, Uchida H, Kawashima H et al (2015) Long-term outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 50:1893–1897
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.07.008
Georgiou R, Eaton S, Stanton MP et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of nonoperative treatment for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 139:e20163003
doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3003
Minneci PC, Mahida JB, Lodwick DL et al (2016) Effectiveness of patient choice in nonoperative vs surgical management of pediatric uncomplicated acute appendicitis. JAMA Surg 151:408–415
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4534
Maita S, Andersson B, Svensson JF et al (2020) Nonoperative treatment for nonperforated appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 36:261–269
doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04610-1
Gorter RR, The SML, Gorter-Stam MAW et al (2017) Systematic review of nonoperative versus operative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 52:1219–1227
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.04.005
Hartwich J, Luks FI, Watson-Smith D et al (2016) Nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis in children: a feasibility study. J Pediatr Surg 51:111–116
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.024
Steiner Z, Buklan G, Stackievicz R et al (2015) A role for conservative antibiotic treatment in early appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 50:1566–1568
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.04.008
Steiner Z, Buklan G, Stackievicz R et al (2017) Conservative treatment in uncomplicated acute appendicitis: reassessment of practice safety. Eur J Pediatr 176:521–527
doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2867-2
Steiner Z, Buklan G, Gutermacher M et al (2018) Conservative antibiotic treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis is feasible. Pediatr Surg Int 34:283–288
doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4226-4
Minneci PC, Hade EM, Lawrence A et al (2020) Association of nonoperative management using antibiotic therapy vs laparoscopic appendectomy with treatment success and disability days in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. JAMA 324:581–593
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10888
Hansson J, Körner U, Ludwigs K et al (2012) Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice. World J Surg 36:2028–2036
doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1641-x
Antakia R, Xanthis A, Georgiades F et al (2021) Acute appendicitis management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective cohort study from a large UK center. Int J Surg 86:32–37
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.12.009
Mowbray NG, Hurt L, Powell-Chandler A et al (2021) Where have all the appendicectomies gone? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 103:250–254
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7128
Swenson DW, Ayyala RS, Sams C et al (2018) Practical imaging strategies for acute appendicitis in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:901–909
doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19778
Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2411050913
Zhang H, Liao M, Chen J et al (2017) Ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging - which is preferred for acute appendicitis in children? A meta-analysis. Pediatr Radiol 47:186–196
doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3727-3
Cundy TP, Gent R, Frauenfelder C et al (2016) Benchmarking the value of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 51:1939–1943
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.009
Bachur RG, Callahan MJ, Monuteaux MC et al (2015) Integration of ultrasound findings and a clinical score in the diagnostic evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr 166:1134–1139
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.034
Eriksson S, Tisell A, Granström L (1995) Ultrasonographic findings after conservative treatment of acute appendicitis and open appendicectomy. Acta Radiol 36:173–177
doi: 10.1177/028418519503600213
Samuel M (2002) Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg 37:877–881
doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.32893
Patkova B, Svenningsson A, Almström M et al (2020) Nonoperative treatment versus appendectomy for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: five-year follow up of a randomized controlled pilot trial. Ann Surg 271:1030–1035
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003646
Tsai HM, Shan YS, Lin PW et al (2006) Clinical analysis of the predictive factors for recurrent appendicitis after initial nonoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 192:311–316
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.037
Koike Y, Uchida K, Matsushita K et al (2014) Intraluminal appendiceal fluid is a predictive factor for recurrent appendicitis after initial successful non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg 49:1116–1121
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.003
Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1313–1319
doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.1180