Effect of closed and permanent stoma on disease course, psychological well-being and working capacity in Swiss IBD cohort study patients.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
03
2022
accepted:
01
09
2022
entrez:
16
9
2022
pubmed:
17
9
2022
medline:
21
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Little is known about the impact of ostomy formation in inflammatory bowel disease patients on course of disease, psychological well-being, quality of life and working capacity. We analyzed patients over a follow-up of up to 16 years in the Swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort study (SIBDCS) with prospective data collection. We compared Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients with and without ostomy as well as permanent and closed stoma formation before and after surgery, investigating disease activity, psychological wellbeing and working capacity in a case-control design. Of 3825 SIBDCS patients, 176 with ostomy were included in the study and matched with 176 patients without ostomy using propensity score, equaling 352 patients for the analysis. As expected, we observed a lower mean and maximal disease activity in patients after stoma surgery compared with control patients without stoma. Overall, psychological wellbeing in patients with stomas vs. controls as well as patients with permanent vs. closed stoma was similar in terms of disease-specific quality of life (total score of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life questionnaire), psychological distress (total score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and stress at work (effort-reward-imbalance ratio), with the exception of a higher Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale total score in patient with vs. without stoma. Compared to IBD patients without stoma, the adverse impact on working capacity in overall stoma IBD patients appeared to be modest. However we observe a significantly higher reduction in working capacity in permanent vs. closed stoma in CD but not UC patients. As to be expected, IBD patients may benefit from closed and permanent stoma application. Stoma surgery appears to only modestly impact working capacity. Importantly, stoma surgery was not associated with adverse psychological outcomes, with comparable psychological well-being regardless of presence and type of stoma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Little is known about the impact of ostomy formation in inflammatory bowel disease patients on course of disease, psychological well-being, quality of life and working capacity.
METHODS
We analyzed patients over a follow-up of up to 16 years in the Swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort study (SIBDCS) with prospective data collection. We compared Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients with and without ostomy as well as permanent and closed stoma formation before and after surgery, investigating disease activity, psychological wellbeing and working capacity in a case-control design.
RESULTS
Of 3825 SIBDCS patients, 176 with ostomy were included in the study and matched with 176 patients without ostomy using propensity score, equaling 352 patients for the analysis. As expected, we observed a lower mean and maximal disease activity in patients after stoma surgery compared with control patients without stoma. Overall, psychological wellbeing in patients with stomas vs. controls as well as patients with permanent vs. closed stoma was similar in terms of disease-specific quality of life (total score of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life questionnaire), psychological distress (total score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and stress at work (effort-reward-imbalance ratio), with the exception of a higher Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale total score in patient with vs. without stoma. Compared to IBD patients without stoma, the adverse impact on working capacity in overall stoma IBD patients appeared to be modest. However we observe a significantly higher reduction in working capacity in permanent vs. closed stoma in CD but not UC patients.
CONCLUSION
As to be expected, IBD patients may benefit from closed and permanent stoma application. Stoma surgery appears to only modestly impact working capacity. Importantly, stoma surgery was not associated with adverse psychological outcomes, with comparable psychological well-being regardless of presence and type of stoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36112586
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274665
pii: PONE-D-22-09385
pmc: PMC9481029
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0274665Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;2(1):2-9
pubmed: 24349679
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;36(2):107-9
pubmed: 22236738
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;107(8):1228-35
pubmed: 22613902
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 Aug 20;25(9):1577-1585
pubmed: 30840762
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;43(3):280-7
pubmed: 26963024
J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Jun 28;12(7):811-818
pubmed: 29617750
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Jun 1;11(6):649-670
pubmed: 28158501
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999 Apr;28(4):S23-7
pubmed: 10204520
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Dec;12(12):720-7
pubmed: 26323879
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011 Jul;17(7):1610-9
pubmed: 21674718
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Nov;21(11):1279-1287
pubmed: 31206974
Gut. 2013 Mar;62(3):368-75
pubmed: 22717453
Gastroenterology. 1976 Mar;70(3):439-44
pubmed: 1248701
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1879-87
pubmed: 23165448
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022 Sep;29(3):596-607
pubmed: 34292456
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):297-301
pubmed: 22552106
Lancet. 2017 Apr 29;389(10080):1756-1770
pubmed: 27914657
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;44(3):249-256
pubmed: 28471882
Laeknabladid. 2016 Nov;102(11):482-489
pubmed: 27813487
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Nov;23(11):1085-1091
pubmed: 31664551
J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):27-41
pubmed: 9547031
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jul;63(7):28-33
pubmed: 28759426
J Crohns Colitis. 2016 Aug;10(8):898-904
pubmed: 26874347
Biometrics. 1947 Sep;3(3):119-22
pubmed: 18903631
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Oct 28;65(42):1166-1169
pubmed: 27787492
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 May;15 Suppl 1:S121-8
pubmed: 24832845
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
J Crohns Colitis. 2015 Jan;9(1):4-25
pubmed: 25304060
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Sep;9(7):773-780
pubmed: 34431613
Gastroenterology. 2016 Jun;150(7):1568-1578
pubmed: 26946343
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;38(4):922-31
pubmed: 18782896
Lancet. 1990 Jul 7;336(8706):16-9
pubmed: 1973211
Gut. 2019 Dec;68(Suppl 3):s1-s106
pubmed: 31562236
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;40(6):623-9
pubmed: 24202226
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 12;100(6):e24717
pubmed: 33578614
Dig Surg. 2001;18(1):51-5
pubmed: 11244260
Dan Med J. 2013 Oct;60(10):B4732
pubmed: 24083536
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022 May 4;28(5):710-719
pubmed: 34137449
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008 Apr 30;3:9
pubmed: 18447923
Dan Med J. 2014 Jan;61(1):B4778
pubmed: 24393595
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Dec;15(12):1240-3
pubmed: 23268268
Colorectal Dis. 2020 May;22(5):544-553
pubmed: 31713994