Remyelination varies between and within lesions in multiple sclerosis following bexarotene.
Journal
Annals of clinical and translational neurology
ISSN: 2328-9503
Titre abrégé: Ann Clin Transl Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623278
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
revised:
16
08
2022
received:
16
06
2022
accepted:
22
08
2022
pubmed:
19
9
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
18
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In multiple sclerosis chronic demyelination is associated with axonal loss, and ultimately contributes to irreversible progressive disability. Enhancing remyelination may slow, or even reverse, disability. We recently trialled bexarotene versus placebo in 49 people with multiple sclerosis. While the primary MRI outcome was negative, there was converging neurophysiological and MRI evidence of efficacy. Multiple factors influence lesion remyelination. In this study we undertook a systematic exploratory analysis to determine whether treatment response - measured by change in magnetisation transfer ratio - is influenced by location (tissue type and proximity to CSF) or the degree of abnormality (using baseline magnetisation transfer ratio and T1 values). We examined treatment effects at the whole lesion level, the lesion component level (core, rim and perilesional tissues) and at the individual lesion voxel level. At the whole lesion level, significant treatment effects were seen in GM but not WM lesions. Voxel-level analyses detected significant treatment effects in WM lesion voxels with the lowest baseline MTR, and uncovered gradients of treatment effect in both WM and CGM lesional voxels, suggesting that treatment effects were lower near CSF spaces. Finally, larger treatment effects were seen in the outer and surrounding components of GM lesions compared to inner cores. Remyelination varies markedly within and between lesions. The greater remyelinating effect in GM lesions is congruent with neuropathological observations. For future remyelination trials, whole GM lesion measures require less complex post-processing compared to WM lesions (which require voxel level analyses) and markedly reduce sample sizes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36116011
doi: 10.1002/acn3.51662
pmc: PMC9539389
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bexarotene
A61RXM4375
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1626-1642Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : BRC-1215-20014
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : RG92001
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : RG79413
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_EX_MR/N50192X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N013255/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
Références
Brain. 2010 Mar;133(Pt 3):858-67
pubmed: 20123726
Brain. 2015 May;138(Pt 5):1239-46
pubmed: 25823475
NMR Biomed. 2001 Apr;14(2):57-64
pubmed: 11320533
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011 Dec;37(7):698-710
pubmed: 21696413
J Neurol. 2017 Feb;264(2):304-315
pubmed: 27888416
Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):43-6
pubmed: 2081237
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:103-9
pubmed: 23110887
Ann Neurol. 2016 May;79(5):726-738
pubmed: 26891452
J Neurol. 2021 Jan;268(1):30-44
pubmed: 31190170
Brain. 1993 Jun;116 ( Pt 3):681-93
pubmed: 8513397
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2017 May 1;76(5):390-401
pubmed: 28521040
Ann Neurol. 2021 Oct;90(4):612-626
pubmed: 34390015
Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3):246-52
pubmed: 23269598
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003 Jul;62(7):723-32
pubmed: 12901699
Ann Neurol. 2010 Oct;68(4):477-93
pubmed: 20976767
Arch Neurol. 2003 Aug;60(8):1073-81
pubmed: 12925362
Brain Pathol. 2007 Apr;17(2):129-38
pubmed: 17388943
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2481-2489
pubmed: 29029896
Neurology. 2020 Dec 1;95(22):e2965-e2976
pubmed: 32938787
Brain. 2009 May;132(Pt 5):1175-89
pubmed: 19339255
Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Nov 5;8(11):624-34
pubmed: 23026979
BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1236-8
pubmed: 9553006
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Apr;11(4):275-83
pubmed: 20216548
Brain. 2021 Jul 28;144(6):1646-1654
pubmed: 33876200
Mult Scler. 2019 Dec;25(14):1835-1841
pubmed: 31687878
Brain. 2016 May;139(Pt 5):1472-81
pubmed: 26956422
Ann Neurol. 2012 Dec;72(6):918-26
pubmed: 23076662
Neurology. 1998 May;50(5):1282-8
pubmed: 9595975
Brain. 2017 Feb;140(2):387-398
pubmed: 28043954
Mult Scler. 2006 Dec;12(6):747-53
pubmed: 17263002
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Nov 16;18(12):753-769
pubmed: 29142295
Ann Neurol. 2004 Sep;56(3):407-15
pubmed: 15349868
Ann Neurol. 2001 Nov;50(5):646-57
pubmed: 11706971
Brain. 2004 Mar;127(Pt 3):692-700
pubmed: 14736754
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2014 Mar;3(2):237-43
pubmed: 25878011
Ann Neurol. 2001 Jun;49(6):793-6
pubmed: 11409432
Trends Neurosci. 2020 Aug;43(8):596-607
pubmed: 32620289
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Mar;16(3):189-199
pubmed: 28229892
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Sep;20(9):709-720
pubmed: 34418398
Mult Scler. 2014 Mar;20(3):322-30
pubmed: 23846352