Does indocyanine green fluorescence angiography impact the intraoperative choice of procedure in free vascularized medial femoral condyle grafting for scaphoid nonunions?
free vascularized bone graft
indocyanine green angiography
medial femoral condyle bone graft
scaphoid nonunion
union rate
Journal
Frontiers in surgery
ISSN: 2296-875X
Titre abrégé: Front Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101645127
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
06
06
2022
accepted:
04
08
2022
entrez:
19
9
2022
pubmed:
20
9
2022
medline:
20
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Free vascularized medial femoral condyle (MFC) bone grafts can lead to increased vascularity of the proximal pole and restore scaphoid architecture in scaphoid nonunions. The intraoperative perfusion assessment of the bone graft is challenging because the conventional clinical examination is difficult. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography has previously been shown to provide a real-time intraoperative evaluation of soft tissue perfusion in reconstructive surgery. The present study investigated the utility of ICG angiography in patients treated with a free medial femoral condyle graft for scaphoid nonunions. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with scaphoid nonunions, in which ICG angiography was used intraoperatively for perfusion assessment. The medical records, radiographs, intraoperative imaging, and operative reports of all patients were reviewed. Intraoperative ICG dye was administered intravenously, and laser angiography was performed to assess bone perfusion. The scaphoid union was examined using postoperative CT scans. Two patients had documented osteonecrosis of the proximal pole at the time of surgery. Four patients received a nonvascularized prior bone graft procedure, and a prior spongiosa graft procedure was performed in one patient. The mean time from injury to the MFC bone graft surgery was 52.7 months, and the mean time from prior failed surgery was 10.4 months. Perfusion of the vascular pedicle of the MFC and the periosteum could be detected in all patients. In two patients, even perfusion of the cancellous bone could be demonstrated by ICG angiography. Following transplantation of the bone graft, patency of the vascular anastomosis and perfusion of the periost were confirmed by ICG angiography in the assessed cases. No additional surgery regarding a salvage procedure for a scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse was necessary for the further course. ICG-angiography has shown to be a promising tool in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion with medial femoral condyle bone grafts. It enables intraoperative decision making by assessment of the microvascular blood supply of the periosteum and the vascular pedicle of the MFC bone graft. Further studies need to evaluate the impact on union rates in a long-term follow-up.
Sections du résumé
Background
Free vascularized medial femoral condyle (MFC) bone grafts can lead to increased vascularity of the proximal pole and restore scaphoid architecture in scaphoid nonunions. The intraoperative perfusion assessment of the bone graft is challenging because the conventional clinical examination is difficult. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography has previously been shown to provide a real-time intraoperative evaluation of soft tissue perfusion in reconstructive surgery. The present study investigated the utility of ICG angiography in patients treated with a free medial femoral condyle graft for scaphoid nonunions.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with scaphoid nonunions, in which ICG angiography was used intraoperatively for perfusion assessment. The medical records, radiographs, intraoperative imaging, and operative reports of all patients were reviewed. Intraoperative ICG dye was administered intravenously, and laser angiography was performed to assess bone perfusion. The scaphoid union was examined using postoperative CT scans.
Results
Two patients had documented osteonecrosis of the proximal pole at the time of surgery. Four patients received a nonvascularized prior bone graft procedure, and a prior spongiosa graft procedure was performed in one patient. The mean time from injury to the MFC bone graft surgery was 52.7 months, and the mean time from prior failed surgery was 10.4 months. Perfusion of the vascular pedicle of the MFC and the periosteum could be detected in all patients. In two patients, even perfusion of the cancellous bone could be demonstrated by ICG angiography. Following transplantation of the bone graft, patency of the vascular anastomosis and perfusion of the periost were confirmed by ICG angiography in the assessed cases. No additional surgery regarding a salvage procedure for a scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse was necessary for the further course.
Conclusion
ICG-angiography has shown to be a promising tool in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion with medial femoral condyle bone grafts. It enables intraoperative decision making by assessment of the microvascular blood supply of the periosteum and the vascular pedicle of the MFC bone graft. Further studies need to evaluate the impact on union rates in a long-term follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36117816
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.962450
pmc: PMC9478374
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
962450Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 Markus, Raymund, Andreas, Aijia, Wibke, Theresa and Ingo.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2007 Dec;11(4):246-58
pubmed: 18090830
J Hand Surg Am. 1991 May;16(3):474-8
pubmed: 1861030
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Nov 20;5(11):e1570
pubmed: 29263970
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Mar;31(3):387-96
pubmed: 16516732
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2018 Oct 25;63(5):547-556
pubmed: 30028724
Orthop Rev. 1994 Nov;23(11):861-71
pubmed: 7854839
Indian J Plast Surg. 2017 May-Aug;50(2):138-147
pubmed: 29343888
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1176-1184
pubmed: 20335867
J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3(2):142-7
pubmed: 2738762
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 May;37(5):1095-100; quiz 1101
pubmed: 22541157
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011 Jul;27(6):355-64
pubmed: 21717392
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Nov;21(4-5):396-404
pubmed: 20058119
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):
pubmed: 35330481
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Dec;90(12):2616-25
pubmed: 19047706
Int Wound J. 2021 Dec;18(6):942-943
pubmed: 34498375
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 08;12(2):
pubmed: 35207725
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Oct;40(8):848-54
pubmed: 25487319
J Surg Res. 2012 Dec;178(2):e43-50
pubmed: 22664132
Microsurgery. 2016 Nov;36(8):684-688
pubmed: 26010370
J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Jul;27(4):685-91
pubmed: 12132096
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Oct;69(10):1382-8
pubmed: 27522453
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2009 Jan;25(1):21-6
pubmed: 18925547
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1666-76; quiz 1677; discussion 1678-9
pubmed: 14578801
Clin Plast Surg. 2003 Jul;30(3):347-57, v-vi
pubmed: 12916592
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Apr 01;9:21
pubmed: 24690301
J Hand Surg Am. 2000 May;25(3):507-19
pubmed: 10811756
Front Surg. 2019 Jul 02;6:39
pubmed: 31334246
J Hand Surg Am. 1985 Sep;10(5):597-605
pubmed: 3900189
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Aug 15;100(16):1379-1386
pubmed: 30106819