Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Medial Osteotomy of the Greater Palatine Foramen in Wide Cleft Palate Repair.

Cleft Palate Medial Osteotomy Mucoperiosteal flap Palate Palatoplasty

Journal

World journal of plastic surgery
ISSN: 2228-7914
Titre abrégé: World J Plast Surg
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101639130

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 27 05 2022
accepted: 19 07 2022
entrez: 19 9 2022
pubmed: 20 9 2022
medline: 20 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Repairing of a wide cleft palate faces with several problems, e.g. medialization of palatal flaps, lack of tissue for repair, and fistula formation. We aimed at quantitative and qualitative evaluation of medial osteotomy of the greater palatine foramen for patients with wide cleft palate and its postoperative outcomes. Eight patients 4 males, 4 females with wide cleft palate and the median age of 1.5 year were operated using medial osteotomy of the greater palatine foramen from 2018-2020. In this technique, the osteotomy was carried in the outlet of vascular pedicle medially and posteriorly. This led to more degrees of freedom for the vascular pedicle and a palatoplasty without tension through mucoperiosteal flap movement toward the medial direction. After osteotomy and repairing for 8 patients (16 flaps), the mean (SD) length of mucoperiosteal flap pedicle was significantly increased from 2.78 mm to 6.09 mm (P<0.001). All patients were successfully repaired with no major complications, and none of them required any secondary repair. Three weeks postoperatively, all patients showed normal feeding, normal nasal resonance of speech with normal palatal mobility. Osteotomy of the greater palatine foramen for the closure of wide palatal clefts showed a good efficiency, quantitatively and qualitatively. The mean length of mucoperiosteal pedicle increased by 3.22 mm (6.44 mm for bilateral) after repairing, which helps to more freely medial movement of the palatal flap and lesser tension across its closure. All patients were successfully improved without any major complications.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Repairing of a wide cleft palate faces with several problems, e.g. medialization of palatal flaps, lack of tissue for repair, and fistula formation. We aimed at quantitative and qualitative evaluation of medial osteotomy of the greater palatine foramen for patients with wide cleft palate and its postoperative outcomes.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Eight patients 4 males, 4 females with wide cleft palate and the median age of 1.5 year were operated using medial osteotomy of the greater palatine foramen from 2018-2020. In this technique, the osteotomy was carried in the outlet of vascular pedicle medially and posteriorly. This led to more degrees of freedom for the vascular pedicle and a palatoplasty without tension through mucoperiosteal flap movement toward the medial direction.
Results UNASSIGNED
After osteotomy and repairing for 8 patients (16 flaps), the mean (SD) length of mucoperiosteal flap pedicle was significantly increased from 2.78 mm to 6.09 mm (P<0.001). All patients were successfully repaired with no major complications, and none of them required any secondary repair. Three weeks postoperatively, all patients showed normal feeding, normal nasal resonance of speech with normal palatal mobility.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Osteotomy of the greater palatine foramen for the closure of wide palatal clefts showed a good efficiency, quantitatively and qualitatively. The mean length of mucoperiosteal pedicle increased by 3.22 mm (6.44 mm for bilateral) after repairing, which helps to more freely medial movement of the palatal flap and lesser tension across its closure. All patients were successfully improved without any major complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36117896
doi: 10.52547/wjps.11.2.129
pmc: PMC9446127
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

129-134

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared

Références

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Mar;107(3):820-2
pubmed: 11304611
Arch Otolaryngol. 1982 Mar;108(3):147-50
pubmed: 7065973
Cleft Palate J. 1986 Jan;23(1):41-7
pubmed: 3455902
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Sep;56(8):1080-1082
pubmed: 30755023
Can J Plast Surg. 2012 Fall;20(3):173-7
pubmed: 23997584
J Craniofac Surg. 2001 Nov;12(6):561-3; discussion 564
pubmed: 11711823
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;8(2):123-7
pubmed: 16549739
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Oct;100(5):1139-43; discussion 1144-5
pubmed: 9326774
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Dec;61(12):1399-404
pubmed: 14663803
Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962 May;29:551-60
pubmed: 13889198
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002 Sep;39(5):560-7
pubmed: 12190346
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1987;21(1):119-28
pubmed: 3589571
Br J Plast Surg. 1951 Oct;4(3):185-7
pubmed: 14886571

Auteurs

Hamidreza Fathi (H)

Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Amiraalam Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

Seyed Saheb Hoseininejad (SS)

Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, AhvazJoundishapour University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Hojjat Molaei (H)

Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Classifications MeSH