Cranial reconstruction evaluation - comparison of European statistical shape model performance on Chinese dataset.

3D planning Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) Ethnicity Skull defects Statistical shape model (SSM) Virtual defect reconstruction Virtual planning

Journal

Bone reports
ISSN: 2352-1872
Titre abrégé: Bone Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101646176

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 05 03 2022
revised: 10 08 2022
accepted: 12 08 2022
entrez: 19 9 2022
pubmed: 20 9 2022
medline: 20 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Morphological variability of the skull is an important consideration for cranioplasty and implant design. Differences in morphology of the skull based on the ethnicity are known. In a previous study we could show the accuracy and benefits of virtual reconstructions based on a statistical shape model (SSM) for neurocranial defects. As the SSM is trained on European data, the question arises how well this model fares when dealing with patients with a different ethnic background. In this study we aim to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of our proposed method when deploying a cranial SSM generated from European data to estimate missing parts of the neurocranium in a Chinese population. We used the same data and methods as in our previous study and compared the outcomes when applied to Chinese individuals. A large unilateral defect on the right side and a bilateral defect were created. The outer surface of the cranial table was reconstructed from CT scans, meshed with triangular elements, and registered to a template. Principal component analysis together with Thin Plate Spines (TPS) deformation was applied to quantify modes of variation. The mesh to mesh distances between the original defects´ surfaces and the reconstructed surface were computed. Comparing the Chinese test group with the European control group, regarding the entire defect the analysis shows no significant difference for unilateral defects (test vs. control group/0.46 mm ± vs. 0.44 mm). Reconstruction of bilateral defects exhibited only in slightly higher prediction errors than those of unilateral defects (0.49 mm ± vs. 0.45 mm). The proposed method shows a high accuracy that seems to be ethnical independent - with low error margins for virtual skull reconstruction and implant design.Clinical relevance: Metallic objects may severely impact image quality in several CBCT devices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36120645
doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101611
pii: S2352-1872(22)00445-4
pmc: PMC9478677
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101611

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Références

Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006 Dec;288(12):1225-33
pubmed: 17075844
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Apr;62(4):1098-107
pubmed: 25389238
Eur J Dent. 2020 Jul;14(3):342-351
pubmed: 32447750
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Sep;154(3):397-404
pubmed: 30173843
Br J Neurosurg. 2020 Oct 14;:1-4
pubmed: 33956553
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0228402
pubmed: 32271782
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0138090
pubmed: 26465141
Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Sep;42(3):175-82
pubmed: 23071968
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Nov;116(6):1726-41
pubmed: 16267439
Am J Hum Biol. 2016 Sep 10;28(5):646-61
pubmed: 26924543
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Dec;11(12):2217-2230
pubmed: 27358081
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2009;12(Pt 2):1-8
pubmed: 20426089
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41
pubmed: 22770690
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 May 7;96(9):e71
pubmed: 24806017
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;45(4):461-466
pubmed: 28202219
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Aug;102(2):300-8
pubmed: 9703063
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jul;99-B(7):927-933
pubmed: 28663399
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Apr;13(4):519-529
pubmed: 29080945
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e2428
pubmed: 31942392
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2015 Aug;157(4):571-81
pubmed: 25845882
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Sep 1;19(3):341-350
pubmed: 31993644
J Biomech. 2013 Jul 26;46(11):1900-6
pubmed: 23764172
Biol Lett. 2009 Dec 23;5(6):849-52
pubmed: 19586965
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Apr;28(2):257-265
pubmed: 28325460
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;47(7):1054-1059
pubmed: 30982558
J Biomech. 2010 Jun 18;43(9):1780-6
pubmed: 20227696
Unfallchirurg. 2020 Sep;123(9):747-750
pubmed: 32556879

Auteurs

Marc Anton Fuessinger (MA)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Marc Christian Metzger (MC)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Rene Rothweiler (R)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Leonard Simon Brandenburg (LS)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Stefan Schlager (S)

Department of Physical Anthropology, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Hebelstr. 29, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH