Defining and identifying critical elements of, and lessons learned from addressing, 'operational readiness' for public health emergency events, including COVID-19: a scoping review protocol.
ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE
INFECTIOUS DISEASES
PUBLIC HEALTH
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 09 2022
19 09 2022
Historique:
entrez:
19
9
2022
pubmed:
20
9
2022
medline:
23
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Much is known around public health preparedness and response phases. However, between the two phases is operational readiness that comprises the immediate actions needed to respond to a developing risk or hazard. Currently, emergency readiness is embedded in multiple frameworks and policy documents related to the health emergency cycle. However, knowledge about operational readiness' critical readiness components and actions required by countries to respond to public health eminent threat is not well known. Therefore, we aim to define and identify the critical elements of 'operational readiness' for public health emergencies, including COVID-19, and identify lessons learnt from addressing it, to inform the WHO Operational Readiness Framework. This is a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Reporting will be according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases and grey literature will be searched and exported into an online systematic review software (eg, Rayyan in this case) for review. The review team, which apart from scoping review methodological experts include content experts in health systems and public health and emergency medicine, prepared an a priori study protocol in consultation with WHO representatives. ATLAS.ti V.9 will be used to conduct thematic data analysis as well as store, organise and retrieve data. Data analysis and presentation will be carried out by five reviewers. This review will reveal new insights, knowledge and lessons learnt that will translate into an operational framework for readiness actions. In consultation with WHO, findings will be disseminated as appropriate (eg, through professional bodies, conferences and research papers). No ethics approvals are required as no humans will be involved in data collection. This rapid scoping review has been registered on Open Science Framework (doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/6SYAH).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36123065
pii: bmjopen-2021-060526
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060526
pmc: PMC9485644
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e060526Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126
pubmed: 33038124
PLoS Curr. 2015 Jul 01;7:
pubmed: 26203400
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):964-980
pubmed: 34002090
Biosecur Bioterror. 2013 Sep;11(3):170-84
pubmed: 24041193
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:13-22
pubmed: 33068715
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:177-183
pubmed: 32615209
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014 Feb;8(1):101-9
pubmed: 24622400
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39
pubmed: 33499930
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45
pubmed: 18616818
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):1344
pubmed: 30518348
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97 Suppl 1:S9-11
pubmed: 17413078