Computed tomography imaging-based predictors of the need for a step-up approach after initial endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic fluid collections.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage
Pancreatic fluid collections
Pancreatic pseudocyst
Predictive factors
Step-up approach
Walled-off necrosis
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
14
06
2022
accepted:
03
09
2022
pubmed:
20
9
2022
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
19
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A step-up approach is recommended as a new treatment algorithm for pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, determining which patients with PFCs require a step-up approach after endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) is unclear. If the need for a step-up approach could be predicted, it could be performed early for relevant patients. We aimed to identify PFC-related predictive factors for a step-up approach after EUS-TD. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-TD for PFCs from January 2008 to May 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate PFC factors related to requiring a step-up approach. A step-up approach was performed for patients who did not respond clinically to EUS-TD. We enrolled 81 patients, of whom 25 (30.9%) required a step-up approach. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the pre-EUS-TD number of PFC-occupied regions ≥ 3 (multivariate odds ratio [OR] 16.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.68-97.6, P = 0.002), the post-EUS-TD PFC-remaining percentage ≥ 35% (multivariate OR 19.9, 95% CI 2.91-136.1, P = 0.002), and a positive sponge sign, which is a distinctive computed tomography finding in the early stage after EUS-TD (multivariate OR 6.26, 95% CI 1.33-29.3, P = 0.020), were independent predictive factors associated with requiring a step-up approach for PFCs. Pre-EUS-TD PFC-occupied regions, post-EUS-TD PFC-remaining percentage, and a positive sponge sign were predictors of the need for a step-up approach. Patients with PFC with these findings should be offered a step-up approach whereas conservative treatment is recommended for patients without these findings. UMIN 000030898.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A step-up approach is recommended as a new treatment algorithm for pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, determining which patients with PFCs require a step-up approach after endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) is unclear. If the need for a step-up approach could be predicted, it could be performed early for relevant patients. We aimed to identify PFC-related predictive factors for a step-up approach after EUS-TD.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-TD for PFCs from January 2008 to May 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate PFC factors related to requiring a step-up approach. A step-up approach was performed for patients who did not respond clinically to EUS-TD.
RESULTS
We enrolled 81 patients, of whom 25 (30.9%) required a step-up approach. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the pre-EUS-TD number of PFC-occupied regions ≥ 3 (multivariate odds ratio [OR] 16.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.68-97.6, P = 0.002), the post-EUS-TD PFC-remaining percentage ≥ 35% (multivariate OR 19.9, 95% CI 2.91-136.1, P = 0.002), and a positive sponge sign, which is a distinctive computed tomography finding in the early stage after EUS-TD (multivariate OR 6.26, 95% CI 1.33-29.3, P = 0.020), were independent predictive factors associated with requiring a step-up approach for PFCs.
CONCLUSION
Pre-EUS-TD PFC-occupied regions, post-EUS-TD PFC-remaining percentage, and a positive sponge sign were predictors of the need for a step-up approach. Patients with PFC with these findings should be offered a step-up approach whereas conservative treatment is recommended for patients without these findings.
CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
UMIN 000030898.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36123547
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09610-2
pii: 10.1007/s00464-022-09610-2
doi:
Banques de données
UMIN-CTR
['UMIN 000030898']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1096-1106Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Hamada S, Masamune A, Shimosegawa T (2016) Management of acute pancreatitis in Japan: analysis of nationwide epidemiological survey. World J Gastroenterol 22:6335–6344
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6335
pubmed: 27605870
pmcid: 4968116
Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA (2020) American gastroenterological association clinical practice update: management of pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 158:67-75.e1
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064
pubmed: 31479658
Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Albert J, Badaoui A, Bali MA, Barthet M, Besselink M, Deviere J, Ferreira AO, Gyokeres T, Hritz I, Hucl T, Milashka M et al (2018) Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy 50:524–546
doi: 10.1055/a-0588-5365
pubmed: 29631305
Isayama H, Nakai Y, Rerknimitr R, Khor C, Lau J, Wang H-P, Seo DW, Ratanachu-Ek T, Lakhtakia S, Ang TL, Ryozawa S, Hayashi T, Kawakam H et al (2016) Asian consensus statements on endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis part 1: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:1546–1554
doi: 10.1111/jgh.13394
pubmed: 27044023
Mukai S, Itoi T, Baron TH, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, Ishii K, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Tanaka R, Umeda J, Tonozuka R, Honjo M, Gotoda T, Moriyasu F, Yasuda I (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of plastic vs. biflanged metal stents for therapy of walled-off necrosis: a retrospective single-center series. Endoscopy 47:47–55
pubmed: 25264765
Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, le Moine O, Deviere J (2006) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 63:635–643
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.028
pubmed: 16564865
Baron TH, DiMajo CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA (2019) American gastroenterological association clinical practice update: management of pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 158:67-75.e1
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064
pubmed: 31479658
Mukai S, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, Ishii K, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Tanaka R, Umeda J, Tonozuka R, Honjo M, Gotoda T, Moriyasu F (2015) Expanding endoscopic interventions for pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis. J Gastroenterol 50:211–220
doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0957-8
pubmed: 24756577
Baron TH, Morgan DE, Yates MR (2002) Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 56:7–17
doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.125106
pubmed: 12085029
van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Schaapherder AF, van Eijck CH, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Nieuwenhuijs VB et al (2010) A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 362:1491–1502
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908821
pubmed: 20410514
Yasuda I, Nakashima M, Iwai T, Isayama H, Itoi T, Hisai H, Inoue H, Kato H, Kanno A, Kubota K, Irisawa A, Igarashi H, Okabe Y, Kitano M, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Mukai T, Sata N, Kida M, Shimosegawa T (2013) Japanese multicenter experience of endoscopic necrosectomy for infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: the JENIPaN study. Endoscopy 45:627–634
doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344027
pubmed: 23807806
Gardner TB, Coelho-Prabhu N, Gordon SR, Gelrud A, Maple JT, Papachristou GI, Freeman ML, Topazian MD, Attam R, Mackenzie TA, Baron TH (2011) Direct endoscopic necrosectomy for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a multicenter U.S. series. Gastrointest Endosc 73:718–726
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.053
pubmed: 21237454
Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W, Jürgensen C, Will U, Gerlach R, Kreitmair C, Meining A, Wehrmann T, Rösch T (2009) Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut 58:1260–1266
doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.163733
pubmed: 19282306
Takada T, Isaji S, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Takeyama Y, Itoi T, Sano K, Iizawa Y, Masamune A, Hirota M, Okamoto K, Inoue D, Kitamura N, Mori Y, Mukai S, Kiriyama S, Shirai K, Tsuchiya A, Higuchi R, Hirashita T (2022) JPN clinical practice guidelines 2021 with easy-to-understand explanations for the management of acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1146
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1146
pubmed: 36401822
Watanabe Y, Mikata R, Yasui S, Ohyama H, Sugiyama H, Sakai Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Kato N (2017) Short- and long-term results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis. World J Gastroenterol 23:7110–7118
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i39.7110
pubmed: 29093619
pmcid: 5656458
Ross AS, Irani S, Gan SI, Rocha F, Siegal J, Fotoohi M, Hauptmann E, Robinson D, Crane R, Kozarek R, Gluck M (2014) Dual-modality drainage of infected and symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis: long-term clinical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 79:929–935
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.014
pubmed: 24246792
Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Sharma RK, Kathiresan J, Gupta R (2014) Do the morphological features of walled off pancreatic necrosis on endoscopic ultrasound determine the outcome of endoscopic transmural drainage? Endosc Ultrasound 3:118–122
doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.131039
pubmed: 24955341
pmcid: 4064159
Zaheer A, Singh VK, Qureshi RO, Fishman EK (2013) The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: updates in imaging terminology and guidelines. Abdom Imaging 38:125–136
doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9908-0
pubmed: 22584543
Guo J, Duan B, Sun S, Wang S, Lui X, Ge N, Liu W, Wang S, Hu J (2020) Multivariate analysis of the factors affecting the prognosis of walled-off pancreatic necrosis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage. Surg Endosc 34:1177–1185
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06870-3
pubmed: 31190223
Morgan DE, Baron TH, Smith JK, Robbin ML, Kenney PJ (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203:773–778
doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169703
pubmed: 9169703
Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Reddy YR, Sharma V, Rao C, Sharma RK, Gupta R (2014) Morphological features of fluid collections on endoscopic ultrasound in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: do they change over time? Ann Gastroenterol 27:258–261
pubmed: 24975052
pmcid: 4073023
Rana SS, Chaudhary V, Sharma R, Sharma V, Chhabra P, Bhasin DK (2016) Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 4:50–53
pubmed: 25573950
Tamura T, Itonaga M, Taniola K, Kawaji Y, Nuta J, Hatamaru K, Yamashita Y, Yoshida T, Ida Y, Maekita T, Iguchi M, Kitano M (2019) Radical treatment for walled-off necrosis: transmural nasocyst continuous irrigation. Dig Endosc 31:307–315
doi: 10.1111/den.13319
pubmed: 30565758
Raraty MG, Halloran CM, Dodd S, Ghaneh P, Connor S, Evans J, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP (2010) Minimal access retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy: improvement in morbidity and mortality with a less invasive approach. Ann Surg 251:787–793
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d96c53
pubmed: 20395850
Bang JY, Wilcox CM, Arnoletti JP, Varadarajulu S (2020) Superiority of endoscopic interventions over minimally invasive surgery for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Dig Endosc 32:298–308
doi: 10.1111/den.13470
pubmed: 31220368
Yasuda I, Takahashi K (2021) Endoscopic management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Dig Endosc 33:335–341
doi: 10.1111/den.13699
pubmed: 32306430
Chen YI, Yang J, Freidland S, Holmes I, Law R, Hosmer A, Stevens T, Franco MC, Jang S, Pawa R, Mathur N, Sejpal DV et al (2019) Lumen apposing metal stents are superior to plastic stents in pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a large international multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 7:e347–e354
doi: 10.1055/a-0828-7630
pubmed: 30834293
pmcid: 6395102
Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Sutton B, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S (2019) Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial. Gut 68:1200–1209
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315335
pubmed: 29858393
Brimhall B, Han S, Tatman PD, Clark TJ, Wani S, Brauer B, Edmundowicz S, Wagh MS, Attwell A, Hammad H, Shah RJ (2018) Increased incidence of pseudoaneurysm bleeding with lumen-apposing metal stents compared to double-pigtail plastic stents in patients with peripancreatic fluid collections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:1521–1528
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.021
pubmed: 29474970
pmcid: 6429551
Abu Dayyeh BK, Mukewar S, Majumder S, Zaghlol R, Valls EJV, Bazerbachi F, Levy MJ, Baron TH, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, Martin J, Gleeson FC, Pearson RK, Chari ST, Vege SS, Topazian MD (2018) Large-caliber metal stents versus plastic stents for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 87:141–149
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.032
pubmed: 28478030
Siddiqui AA, Kowalski TE, Loren DE, Khalid A, Soomro A, Mazhar SM, Isby L, Kahaleh M, Karia K, Yoo J, Ofosu A, Ng B, Sharaiha RZ (2017) Fully covered self-expanding metal stents versus lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent versus plastic stents for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: clinical outcomes and success. Gastrointest Endosc 85:758–765
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.014
pubmed: 27566053
Bapaye A, Dubale NA, Sheth KA, Bapaye J, Ramesh J, Gadhikar H, Mahajani S, Date S, Pujari R, Gaadhe R (2017) Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transmural drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: comparison between a specially designed fully covered bi-flanged metal stent and multiple plastic stents. Dig Endosc 29:104–110
doi: 10.1111/den.12704
pubmed: 27463528
Bang JY, Wilcox CM, Arnoletti JP, Peter S, Christein J, Navaneethan U, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S (2021) Validation of the Orlando Protocol for endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections in the era of lumen-apposing metal stents. Dig Endosc 34:612–621
doi: 10.1111/den.14099
pubmed: 34331485
pmcid: 9290475