A Prospective Assessment of an Adjustable, Immediate Fit, Subischial Transfemoral Prosthesis.

Adjustable prosthesis Amputation Limb loss PCUQ, Prosthetic Comfort and Utility Questionnaire PEQ, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire Prosthetic Transfemoral amputation Transfemoral prosthesis

Journal

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation
ISSN: 2590-1095
Titre abrégé: Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763542

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
entrez: 20 9 2022
pubmed: 21 9 2022
medline: 21 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess the feasibility of an adjustable, subischial transfemoral prosthesis by comparing self-reported outcome measures regarding socket comfort, fit and utility relative to a persons' conventionally made socket. Assessing limb compressibility was another aim of this study. A single-group pre-post intervention design. Physical medicine and rehabilitation biomechanics laboratory. All 18 enrolled participants (N = 18) completed the feasibility trial. There were 16 men and 2 women with an average age of 59.4 (±7) years. Most of the participants (61.1%) had worn a socket for 1 to 10 years before the trial, 22.2% of the participants had worn one for less than a year, and 16.7% of the participants had worn a prosthesis for more than 10 years. Participants were fit with the study prosthesis and used it for a 2-week home trial. A Prosthetic Comfort and Utility Questionnaire was completed on the participant's conventional prosthetic device and the subischial socket system after the trial. The adjustable subischial prostheses were rated superior overall to the participant's conventional sockets (40.9 ± 7.2 vs 32.8 ± 10.8; The adjustable, immediate fit, subischial prosthesis provided safe, comfortable, and functional ambulation for persons with transfemoral limb loss in this short-term feasibility study. This study supports the consideration of a new paradigm in transfemoral prosthetics-adjustable subischial sockets. These devices should be tested in a larger multi-center study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36123976
doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100200
pii: S2590-1095(22)00024-6
pmc: PMC9482040
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100200

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Références

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):361-71
pubmed: 20803404
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Jun;41(3):246-250
pubmed: 28132589
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Mar 15;3(2):100120
pubmed: 34179756
PM R. 2021 Aug;13(8):819-826
pubmed: 33010182
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;80(8):563-71
pubmed: 11475475
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1979 Aug;3(2):73-81
pubmed: 503796
J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):146-52
pubmed: 25480541
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1685-92
pubmed: 17671005
Artif Limbs. 1955 Jan;2(1):35-60
pubmed: 14351063
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov;99(11):1026-1031
pubmed: 33060371
PM R. 2019 Nov;11(11):1210-1217
pubmed: 30734517
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1999 Dec;23(3):239-44
pubmed: 10890599
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009 Dec;33(4):378-90
pubmed: 19961297
PM R. 2016 Aug;8(8):730-7
pubmed: 26690021
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Dec;42(6):620-625
pubmed: 29775131
J UOEH. 1999 Jun 1;21(2):107-18
pubmed: 10434359
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(10):1493-504
pubmed: 23516053
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Oct;54(7):399-410
pubmed: 21996548
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(6):641-52
pubmed: 26562228
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000 Apr;24(1):19-27
pubmed: 10855435
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov;102(11):2063-2073.e2
pubmed: 34214499
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1985 Aug;9(2):69-78
pubmed: 4047922
J Rehabil R D. 1983 Jul;20(1):57-71
pubmed: 6887067
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(4):385-96
pubmed: 26348602
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Aug;79(8):931-8
pubmed: 9710165
J Soc Occup Med. 1985 Winter;35(4):114-7
pubmed: 4079344
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Dec;2(4):
pubmed: 33381750
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1990 Apr;14(1):9-21
pubmed: 2192356
US Army Med Dep J. 2018 Jul-Dec;(2-18):38-47
pubmed: 30623397
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Jun;41(3):237-245
pubmed: 28094686
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Sep;41(5):683-94
pubmed: 15558398
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):723-9
pubmed: 15129395

Auteurs

Timothy R Dillingham (TR)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Jessica L Kenia (JL)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Frances S Shofer (FS)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

James S Marschalek (JS)

Advanced Design Concepts, Pewaukee, WI.

Classifications MeSH