Response assessment in pediatric craniopharyngioma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) Working Group.
craniopharyngioma
functional
pediatric
response
Journal
Neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1523-5866
Titre abrégé: Neuro Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 02 2023
14 02 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
21
9
2022
medline:
16
2
2023
entrez:
20
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Craniopharyngioma is a histologically benign tumor of the suprasellar region for which survival is excellent but quality of life is often poor secondary to functional deficits from tumor and treatment. Standard therapy consists of maximal safe resection with or without radiation therapy. Few prospective trials have been performed, and response assessment has not been standardized. The Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) committee devised consensus guidelines to assess craniopharyngioma response prospectively. Magnetic resonance imaging is the recommended radiologic modality for baseline and follow-up assessments. Radiologic response is defined by 2-dimensional measurements of both solid and cystic tumor components. In certain clinical contexts, response to solid and cystic disease may be differentially considered based on their unique natural histories and responses to treatment. Importantly, the committee incorporated functional endpoints related to neuro-endocrine and visual assessments into craniopharyngioma response definitions. In most circumstances, the cystic disease should be considered progressive only if growth is associated with acute, new-onset or progressive functional impairment. Craniopharyngioma is a common pediatric central nervous system tumor for which standardized response parameters have not been defined. A RAPNO committee devised guidelines for craniopharyngioma assessment to uniformly define response in future prospective trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Craniopharyngioma is a histologically benign tumor of the suprasellar region for which survival is excellent but quality of life is often poor secondary to functional deficits from tumor and treatment. Standard therapy consists of maximal safe resection with or without radiation therapy. Few prospective trials have been performed, and response assessment has not been standardized.
METHODS
The Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) committee devised consensus guidelines to assess craniopharyngioma response prospectively.
RESULTS
Magnetic resonance imaging is the recommended radiologic modality for baseline and follow-up assessments. Radiologic response is defined by 2-dimensional measurements of both solid and cystic tumor components. In certain clinical contexts, response to solid and cystic disease may be differentially considered based on their unique natural histories and responses to treatment. Importantly, the committee incorporated functional endpoints related to neuro-endocrine and visual assessments into craniopharyngioma response definitions. In most circumstances, the cystic disease should be considered progressive only if growth is associated with acute, new-onset or progressive functional impairment.
CONCLUSIONS
Craniopharyngioma is a common pediatric central nervous system tumor for which standardized response parameters have not been defined. A RAPNO committee devised guidelines for craniopharyngioma assessment to uniformly define response in future prospective trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36124689
pii: 6702540
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac221
pmc: PMC9925711
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
224-233Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Jul;67(7):e28379
pubmed: 32383818
Pituitary. 2017 Apr;20(2):267-281
pubmed: 27604996
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):e305-e316
pubmed: 32502457
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 May;66(5):e27631
pubmed: 30693650
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 11;23:66-71
pubmed: 32490217
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):e187-92
pubmed: 23245282
Klin Padiatr. 2001 Jul-Aug;213(4):244-9
pubmed: 11528558
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012 Dec;10(6):498-503
pubmed: 23061825
J Neurooncol. 2018 May;137(3):645-651
pubmed: 29344823
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251
pubmed: 34185076
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Jan;16 Suppl 10:x1-x36
pubmed: 25542864
Neurology. 2007 Mar 20;68(12):932-8
pubmed: 17372129
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Oct;40(10):1532-41
pubmed: 23740370
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997 Oct;18(9):1635-40
pubmed: 9367310
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Aug;14(8):1070-8
pubmed: 22735773
Pituitary. 2016 Aug;19(4):422-8
pubmed: 27125511
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Oct 01;19(10):1398-1407
pubmed: 28499018
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jul;89(7):3298-305
pubmed: 15240606
J Neurosurg. 1998 Oct;89(4):547-51
pubmed: 9761047
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 14;9(2):
pubmed: 32075140
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jul;18(3):327-330
pubmed: 30919136
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Sep;156(9):887-92
pubmed: 12197795
Neurology. 2013 Nov 19;81(21 Suppl 1):S1-5
pubmed: 24249801
Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Aug;36(8):1635-1642
pubmed: 32440897
Childs Nerv Syst. 2018 Jan;34(1):51-60
pubmed: 28844094
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010 Nov;6(11):609-18
pubmed: 20877295
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 23;376(12):1195
pubmed: 28328340
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Dec;41(6):E15
pubmed: 27903114
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Sep;59(5):466-70
pubmed: 27651864
Neurology. 2016 Dec 6;87(23):2403-2407
pubmed: 27815398
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Jul;17(7):1029-38
pubmed: 25838139
Pituitary. 2021 Aug;24(4):517-522
pubmed: 33506438
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):1696-1704
pubmed: 32393959
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 14;11:698150
pubmed: 34336685
J Neurosurg. 2006 Feb;104(2 Suppl):94-102
pubmed: 16506496
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Nov 7;5(1):75
pubmed: 31699993
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 1;73(3):716-21
pubmed: 18676089
Neurology. 2007 Feb 27;68(9):643-7
pubmed: 17215493
Cancer Causes Control. 2006 May;17(4):583-9
pubmed: 16596314
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jul;40(7):1140-1148
pubmed: 31221635
Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;48(6):494-9
pubmed: 24314410
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Oct 1;90(2):354-61
pubmed: 25052561
J Neurooncol. 2012 Sep;109(2):349-55
pubmed: 22692563
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0240016
pubmed: 33002047
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):e330-e336
pubmed: 32502459
Neuroophthalmology. 2015 Jun 17;39(3):132-139
pubmed: 27928346
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):413-419
pubmed: 27845838
Neurology. 2013 Nov 19;81(21 Suppl 1):S41-4
pubmed: 24249805
Radiother Oncol. 2007 Jan;82(1):90-5
pubmed: 17161483
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005 Feb;62(2):197-204
pubmed: 15670196
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):e317-e329
pubmed: 32502458
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 2;11(1):2840
pubmed: 33531536
J Neurosurg. 2000 Feb;92(2):255-60
pubmed: 10659012
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 14;7:CD008890
pubmed: 27416004