Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Long-Term Upadacitinib Therapy in Five Randomized Controlled Trials.
RAPID3
Rheumatoid arthritis
Upadacitinib
Journal
Rheumatology and therapy
ISSN: 2198-6576
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101674543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
12
05
2022
accepted:
05
08
2022
pubmed:
21
9
2022
medline:
21
9
2022
entrez:
20
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a patient-reported outcome tool recommended for the assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. This analysis evaluated the long-term effect of upadacitinib vs. comparators on RAPID3 scores in patients with RA in the phase 3 SELECT clinical trial program. This post hoc analysis included data from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily (QD) as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). The proportions of patients reporting RAPID3 remission (scores ≤ 3) were assessed at week 60. Correlations between absolute scores for RAPID3 and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) at week 60 were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. A total of 3117 patients were included from the SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, -MONOTHERAPY, -COMPARE, and -EARLY trials. By week 60, 32-52% of methotrexate-naïve and csDMARD inadequate responder (IR) patients treated with either upadacitinib 15 mg QD or upadacitinib 30 mg QD reported RAPID3 scores consistent with remission. The proportions were slightly lower in the biologic DMARD-IR SELECT-BEYOND population (19-28%). RAPID3 scores highly correlated (Spearman correlation values ≥ 0.58) with CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28(CRP) scores through week 60 (all p < 0.001). Upadacitinib, as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs, was associated with patient-reported remission assessed by RAPID3 over 60 weeks across the SELECT RCTs in patients with RA. SELECT-BEYOND (NCT02706847); SELECT-NEXT (NCT02675426); SELECT-MONOTHERAPY (NCT02706951); SELECT-EARLY (NCT02706873); SELECT-COMPARE (NCT02629159). Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease that causes inflammation of the joints. Doctors have several ways of assessing how bad a patient’s disease is, and these often use a combination of signs and symptoms to develop a ‘score’. One method is called RAPID3, which is a score based on an overall assessment of the disease by the patient, the level of pain, and the amount of physical disability. An advantage of RAPID3 is that it is quick and easy to use, and since it uses only patient-reported symptoms, it can be measured easily via telemedicine, without the need for an in-person consultation. In this study, we decided to look into the effect of upadacitinib, a drug used for the treatment of RA, on RAPID3 score in patients with RA. We also investigated whether RAPID3 correlates with other ways of measuring RA severity, including scores that use physician-measured factors such as number of affected joints, as this can help show whether RAPID3 is a valid and useful tool. We found that upadacitinib led to long-term improvements in RAPID3 score, and that results were the same in different studies and patient groups, including patients who had not responded well to other treatments. We also found that RAPID3 correlated well with other measures, i.e., improvements in RAPID3 happened in parallel with improvements in other scores. Overall, these results suggest that RAPID3 can be a useful tool in patients with RA.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease that causes inflammation of the joints. Doctors have several ways of assessing how bad a patient’s disease is, and these often use a combination of signs and symptoms to develop a ‘score’. One method is called RAPID3, which is a score based on an overall assessment of the disease by the patient, the level of pain, and the amount of physical disability. An advantage of RAPID3 is that it is quick and easy to use, and since it uses only patient-reported symptoms, it can be measured easily via telemedicine, without the need for an in-person consultation. In this study, we decided to look into the effect of upadacitinib, a drug used for the treatment of RA, on RAPID3 score in patients with RA. We also investigated whether RAPID3 correlates with other ways of measuring RA severity, including scores that use physician-measured factors such as number of affected joints, as this can help show whether RAPID3 is a valid and useful tool. We found that upadacitinib led to long-term improvements in RAPID3 score, and that results were the same in different studies and patient groups, including patients who had not responded well to other treatments. We also found that RAPID3 correlated well with other measures, i.e., improvements in RAPID3 happened in parallel with improvements in other scores. Overall, these results suggest that RAPID3 can be a useful tool in patients with RA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36125701
doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00483-4
pii: 10.1007/s40744-022-00483-4
pmc: PMC9562978
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02706847', 'NCT02675426', 'NCT02629159', 'NCT02706847', 'NCT02675426', 'NCT02706951', 'NCT02706873']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1517-1529Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Aug;37(8):2043-2053
pubmed: 29656373
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 15;383(16):1511-1521
pubmed: 33053283
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2503-2512
pubmed: 29908669
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jul;73(7):924-939
pubmed: 34101387
Drug Saf. 2021 May;44(5):515-530
pubmed: 33527177
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 May;36(5):1143-1148
pubmed: 28013433
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Mar;48(3):625-30
pubmed: 12632413
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;71(11):1788-1800
pubmed: 31287230
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;71(12):1540-1555
pubmed: 31709779
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 May;69(5):609-615
pubmed: 27564431
Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2303-2311
pubmed: 31130260
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Jul-Aug;34(4):646-54
pubmed: 27384748
Rheumatol Int. 2019 May;39(5):827-834
pubmed: 30847560
J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;46(1):27-30
pubmed: 30323010
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1142-9
pubmed: 21485024
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;72(10):1607-1620
pubmed: 32638504
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Mod Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;30(5):779-787
pubmed: 32530345
J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;35(4):603-9
pubmed: 18322993
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Jul 1;60(7):3209-3221
pubmed: 33313898
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2513-2524
pubmed: 29908670
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Dec 9;21(1):272
pubmed: 31815649
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 Nov;35(4):773-8, viii
pubmed: 19962621
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Dec 1;60(12):5583-5594
pubmed: 33590829
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S19-28
pubmed: 16273781
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Dec 2;21(1):263
pubmed: 31791386
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):685-699
pubmed: 31969328
Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Dec;31(12):1663-9
pubmed: 22983768
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug;21(4):755-87
pubmed: 17678834